User:NAL77/Kairos (retreat)/Ldd52 Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

• Whose work are you reviewing? NAL77
• Link to draft you're reviewing: Kairos (retreat)

Checklist:

• Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?: Everything in the article is relevant to the topic of the retreat.
• Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?: Most of the article is completely neutral in that it describes the details of the retreat, however when describing its purpose in the "Current Form" section, it could be argued that these points are personal. Therefore, a source should be included if they are facts, and it should be removed if they are personal opinions.
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?: No viewpoints are particularly over or underrepresented.
• Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? The links for all the sources work, but references 4, 5, and 6 are missing a title, a very important component of a citation.
• Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?: Every fact is supported by a source in the lead section and history section, but there is only one reference in the current form section. More references should be added to this section.
• Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?: All of the information cited is within the past 10 years, which is relatively up to date, but more recent sources should be added for the current forms section.