User:NatalieBullis/Evaluate an Article

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Evaluate an article[edit]

This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

  • Name of article: Law
  • Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I believe that Law itself is very interesting, important to know about and follow.

Lead[edit]

Guiding questions
  • Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes its very clear
  • Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes the whole article is about Law
  • Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No it clearly tells what Law is.
  • Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? A little over detailed

Lead evaluation[edit]

Content[edit]

Guiding questions
  • Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, the article's content relevant to the topic
  • Is the content up-to-date? Yes, the content up-to-date
  • Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No, I do think it is a little over detailed

Content evaluation[edit]

Tone and Balance[edit]

Guiding questions
  • Is the article neutral? Yes, it shows the good side of Law and why we need it and use it in our everyday lives.
  • Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
  • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
  • Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation[edit]

Sources and References[edit]

Guiding questions
  • Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes it gives a long detailed History paragraph
  • Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
  • Are the sources current?
  • Check a few links. Do they work? Yes the vocabulary links work for each word.

Sources and references evaluation[edit]

Organization[edit]

Guiding questions
  • Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Its not easy to read its very detailed
  • Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No grammar issues
  • Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, gives the history and legal theory and much more.

Organization evaluation[edit]

Images and Media[edit]

Guiding questions
  • Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? The images look old.
  • Are images well-captioned? Yes
  • Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
  • Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes, could be bigger

Images and media evaluation[edit]

Checking the talk page[edit]

Guiding questions
  • What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
  • How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
  • How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? Yes

Talk page evaluation[edit]

Overall impressions[edit]

Guiding questions
  • What is the article's overall status? Gives an over view of what Law is.
  • What are the article's strengths? Very well written with many examples, and links to the vocabulary terms
  • How can the article be improved? I think the article could be shorten where it has the History of Law
  • How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? The article well-developed.

Overall evaluation[edit]

Optional activity[edit]

  • Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~~~~

  • Link to feedback: