User:NatasaEleftheriou/French Bulldog/Ririying Peer Review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Peer review[edit]

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info[edit]

  • Whose work are you reviewing? - NatasaEleftheriou

Lead[edit]

Guiding questions:

  • Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
    • Yes
  • Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
    • Yes
  • Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
    • Yes and more than that.
  • Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
    • Yes
  • Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
    • I think it's perfect. If I have to say, it can be more detailed.

Lead evaluation[edit]

The lead provides an overall introduction of french bulldog. It presents the history of the breed and the popularity in different countries. It has reached all the requirements of a good Lead. Good job!

Content[edit]

Guiding questions:

  • Is the content added relevant to the topic?
    • Yes
  • Is the content added up-to-date?
    • Yes
  • Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
    • No

Content evaluation[edit]

The content overall is well-structured and well-preformed. And it follows the chronologically order to present the useful information. I would say 10 out of 10.

Tone and Balance[edit]

Guiding questions:

  • Is the content added neutral?
    • Yes
  • Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
    • No
  • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
    • No
  • Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
    • No

Tone and balance evaluation[edit]

No biased tone. The content is well-balanced.

Sources and References[edit]

Guiding questions:

  • Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
    • Yes
  • Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
    • Yes
  • Are the sources current?
    • Yes
  • Check a few links. Do they work?
    • Yes they do

Sources and references evaluation[edit]

The sources you added are updated and thorough. I would say very good!

Organization[edit]

Guiding questions:

  • Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
    • Yes
  • Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
    • Haven't spotted any
  • Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
    • Yes

Organization evaluation[edit]

Well-organized

Images and Media[edit]

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

  • Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
    • Yes, they are very helpful.
  • Are images well-captioned?
    • Yes
  • Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
    • Yes, I like the layout.

Images and media evaluation[edit]

The pictures are well-placed. Perfect.

For New Articles Only[edit]

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

  • Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
    • Yes
  • How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
    • Yes
  • Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?
    • Yes

New Article Evaluation[edit]

Perfect

Overall impressions[edit]

Guiding questions:

  • Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
    • Definitely
  • What are the strengths of the content added?
    • I noticed newly added information of french bulldog and it's very useful for the viewers to have an updated knowledge about this breed.
  • How can the content added be improved?
    • The article can provide more information about different colors of the bulldog, like is there any relation between colors and its temper? how to breed in order to have a certain color? Is there any crossbreed between bulldog and other breeds? And what do the crossbreeds look like?

Overall evaluation[edit]

The article overall is 99 out of 100! I think the overall construction and its content.