Jump to content

User:Ngeer20/Syntrophobacter wolinii/Ortiz.carolina Peer Review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

General info

[edit]
Whose work are you reviewing?

Ngeer20

Link to draft you're reviewing
User:Ngeer20/Syntrophobacter wolinii
Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
Syntrophobacter wolinii

Evaluate the drafted changes

[edit]

Lead

[edit]
Guiding questions
  • Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
    • Yes, it's very specific.
  • Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
    • No.
  • Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
    • Yes, in general.
  • Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
    • It is short and concise. It is 4 sentences.

Content

[edit]
Guiding questions
  • Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
    • Yes it is. Is limited.
  • Is the content up-to-date?
    • Yes.
  • Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
    • N/A
  • Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance

[edit]
Guiding questions
  • Is the article neutral?
    • Yes
  • Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
    • No
  • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
    • No
  • Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
    • No

Sources and References

[edit]
Guiding questions
  • Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
    • Yes, in general.
  • Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
    • Yes
  • Are the sources current?
    • Yes
  • Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
  • Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

[edit]
Guiding questions
  • Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
    • It is easy to read and understand. It is very concise and specific.
  • Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
    • No.
  • Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
    • Yes, it is divided into 3 sections.

Images and Media

[edit]
Guiding questions
  • Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
    • No, the article does not have images.
  • Are images well-captioned?
    • N/A
  • Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
    • N/A
  • Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
    • N/A

Overall impressions

[edit]
Guiding questions
  • What is the article's overall status?
    • It's a good article but more information is needed.
  • What are the article's strengths?
    • it's easy to understand.
  • How can the article be improved?
    • More information.
  • How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
    • It is a well developed article.