User talk:Noaya97/sandbox
Effects of youth unemployment in France have been indicators of social issues in France begining in the 1980's.
- Jump up^ Malinvaud (1986). The Rise of Unemployment in France. Wiley.
Youth Unemployment in France began to escalate in the years of 1990 to 2000. Unemployment was the first to go under between the years of 1990-1997, raising the unemployment rate from 8.9% to 12.5%.
Social issues in France
[edit]- Increase in poverty
- formation of the permanent lower class
- comon strikes and labor unrests
- student protests leading to difficulty finding a decent job
- anti-Semitism racism
sources- Cross, MaÌire, and Sheila Perry. Population and Social Policy in France. London: Pinter, 1997. Web. 8 Feb. 2017.
Laurence, Jonathan, and Justin VaiÌsse. Integrating Islam: Political and Religious Challenges in Contemporary France. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 2006. Web. 8 Feb. 2017.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2017/01/18/six-astonishing-things-betsy-devos-said-and-refused-to-say-at-her-confirmation-hearing/ In this article by the Washington Post, it is first: not a neutral article for the reason that the Washington Post swings left in their published writings, and second; it is reliable, because if you go back and watch the entire video online, you wil see that the Washington Post did not mess with the clips in the film to convey any type of different perspective than what she actually said and how she reacted. I was able to get the same effect from the entire hearring.
http://occupydemocrats.com/2017/01/17/cbo-trumps-obamacare-repeal-will-spike-premiums-50-one-year/ This article is not neutral for the reason that it is indeed a democratic political organization. This article features statements like, "But on the bright side, according to the Republican party’s overly optimistic figures, we will cut the annual deficit by an estimated 1.1%.", and clarly not imlyping that this is "on the bright side". This article also stated something like, "At least they are upfront about their cold-hearted realism". this is clearly not a neutral article. The article does seem to be reliable because of all the external links within the text, but it is not to be trusted because of all of the "this is absurd", "it only gets worse" comments, not giving clear reasoning or real numbers when usuing these terms. These terms are only trying to persude a reader that the republocan party is careless and cold hearted. A clear message about repealing Obamacare is not delivered.
https://www.facebook.com/OccupyDemocrats/photos/a.347907068635687.81180.346937065399354/1392270180866032/?type=3&theater This meme is clearly not neutral in the way that it is clearly stating that Donald Trump is the worst president ever. This meme is not reliable because it is just a meme that could be interchanged with any other president on the cover.
Feb 16 timeline questions
[edit]What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia as a source of information?
- Impacts include the wide accessibility for anyone to go on the site and change information they seem does not suit.
- Limits include the restriction on using Wikipedia as a source for any essay/article.
On Wikipedia, all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. What kinds of sources does this exclude? Can you think of any problems that might create?
- Websites;
If Wikipedia was written 100 years ago, how might its content (and contributors) be different? What about 100 years from now?
- If Wikipedia was written 100 years ago, there would be a lot less articles due to racial and gender issues. Wikipedia might not be as neutral and unbiased because of the right wing way of living that was more popular.
- ...and we didn't have no internet... Dr Aaij (talk) 03:59, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- If we could take a look at Wikipedia 100 years from now there will be a lot more credible sources that are allowed on Wikipedia.
Peer Review 2
[edit]Great start to an article. This draft keeps it's informative qualities while remaining unbiased. I would add a "presemt day" part to your article explaining what he does and where he resides presently.