User:NotNorwine/Robert "Buddy" Battle III/Strensch22 Peer Review
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
General info[edit]
- Whose work are you reviewing?
NotNorwine and Augustanastudent
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:NotNorwine/Robert_%22Buddy%22_Battle_III?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- (Does not exist)
Evaluate the drafted changes[edit]
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)
The lead is a good start, only one sentence long but I understand why (no beginning info to add to, had to start with nothing). Yes it does clearly describe the articles topic. The lead does not include a brief introduction, to make it longer you can add a thesis type statement to tell the reader what you are about to inform them on in a shorter manner.The lead contains things only included in the article, nothing outside of it. it is concise, only negative is that it could be longer, just make sure it is not overly detailed, don't add too much. Overall, it is a good start and like I said it will be hard to make it longer when there was no prior bibliography to edit and you are coming up with this entirely on your own.
Yes the content is relevant to the topic, explains it well, could be a little more in depth. It is up to date, could add more in depth info about his life (I am sure you are not done yet though). Only thing missing is more in depth info. Next, the content is easy to read and concise, add some more about his life that is important. Finally, double check for spelling errors and other punctuation mistakes.