User:Paco BRG/Bocage/Jacob Atkinson Peer Review
< User:Paco BRG | Bocage
Peer review[edit]
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info[edit]
- Whose work are you reviewing? Paco BRG
- Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Paco BRG/Bocage
Lead[edit]
Guiding questions:
There is no lead. Probably in the original article already[edit]
Content[edit]
Guiding questions:
- The content is relevant .
Content evaluation[edit]
Tone and Balance[edit]
Guiding questions:
- Content is from a neutral perspective.
Tone and balance evaluation[edit]
Sources and References[edit]
Guiding questions:
- There are no sources as of yet.
Sources and references evaluation[edit]
Organization[edit]
Guiding questions:
- content is mostly in bullet format currently. But ideas are in a coherent sequence.
Organization evaluation[edit]
Images and Media[edit]
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
- Are images well-captioned?
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
Images and media evaluation[edit]
For New Articles Only[edit]
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
- Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
- How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
- Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
- Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?
New Article Evaluation[edit]
Overall impressions[edit]
Guiding questions
overall, I think there are some very interesting ideas you plan on adding to the article. Just maybe some sources for clarity would be helpful.