User:Pee Tern/Sandbox/Kmap/Navpagetbl

This table provides a comparison of the Wikipedia pages supporting navigation and crossreferencing.

Page Type	Encyclopedic Content	Nature of Content	Coverage Completeness	Update Regime	Depth of Coverage	Breadth of Coverage	Important Crossreferences
Portal	Yes.	Reader's overview of intersting content and activities related to the area of interest.	Interesting pages and content from the area of interest.	Emerging issues. Daily.	High.	Very broad.	Should have a main article and at least one knowledge map.
Knowledge Map	Meta encyclopedic content.	Topographical overview of a Wikipedia knowledge area for readers and editors.	Key pages accross all areas in the knowledge area.	As required. Additative.	High to medium.	Broad.	Should have a major category and a Wiktionary entry.
Category	None.	Hierarchical lists of similar pages.	All relevant pages.	As required. Additative.	Full.	Narrow at any level.	Should have as a main documentation page, either an article or a knowledge map.
Disambiguation	Meta encyclopedic content.	Separation of overloaded subject titles for readers.	All relevant pages.	As required. Additative.	Low.	Board.	Must reference at least two topically unrelated pages.
Article	Yes.	Content for readers.	All relevant encyclopedic content.	As required.¹ Additative.	Low.	Narrow.	All reference pages and relevant categories.
Project	None.	Editor's priorities and issues in selected portion of an area of interest.	Selected groups of pages limited by time and available editors. Somewhat arbitrary.	As required. Emerging issues and project objective milestones.	Selective across levels.	Selective across areas.	Must have a scope page and an objectives page.

1 Mostly stable for the long term but current events articles can be updated daily or more frequently.