User:Pocketsized24/Criminal psychology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Article Draft (Everything underlined and in italics have been moved to Wiki)[edit]

Lead[edit]

Criminal psychology, also referred to as criminological psychology, is the study of the views, thoughts, intentions, actions and reactions of criminals and suspects. It is a subfield of criminology and applied psychology.

Criminal psychologists have many roles within legal courts, including being called upon as expert witnesses and performing psychological assessments. Some types of psychiatry behaviour behavior with aspects of criminal behaviour behavior. Several definitions are used for criminal behaviour behavior, including behaviour behavior punishable by public law, behaviour behavior considered immoral, behaviour behavior violating social norms or traditions, or acts causing severe psychological harm. Criminal behaviour behavior is often considered antisocial in nature. Psychologists also help with crime prevention and study the different types of programs that are effective to prevent recidivism,[1] and understanding which mental disorders criminals are likely to have.[2][3][4][5][6][7]

Article body[edit]

Profiling[edit][edit]

Main article: Offender profiling

See also: Racial profiling

Criminal profiling, also known as offender profiling, is a form of criminal investigation, linking an offender's actions at the crime scene to possible characteristics. Most commonly used for homicide and sexual cases, criminal profiling helps law enforcement investigators narrow down and prioritize a pool of suspects.[8] Part of a sub-field of forensic psychology called investigative psychology, criminal profiling has advanced substantially in methodology and grown in popularity since its conception in the late 1800s. However, there is a substantial lack of empirical research and effectiveness evaluations validating the practice of criminal profiling.

Criminal profiling is a process now known in the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) as criminal investigative analysis. (see also: FBI method of profiling) Profilers, or criminal investigative analysts, are trained and experienced law enforcement officers who study every behavioral aspect and detail of an unsolved violent crime scene, in which a certain amount of psychopathology has been left at the scene. The characteristics of a good profiler are discussed. Five behavioral characteristics that can be gleaned from the crime scene are described:

  1. amount of premeditation, planning that went into the crime before the crime,
  2. degree of control used by the offender,
  3. escalation of emotion at the scene,
  4. risk level of both the offender and victim, and
  5. appearance of the crime scene (disorganized versus organized).

The process of interpreting the behavior observed at a crime scene is briefly discussed.

In a 2017 article by Pew rResearch cCenter, it was found that federal and state prisons in the United States held 475,900 inmates who were black African American and 436,500 who were white. Similar historical data supports the substantially higher incarceration of black people African Americans. This is in contrast with census data which has placed the percentage of black people or African American people at about 12% of the US population. Negative ethnic stereotypes contribute to this disproportionate incarceration; it has served as a justification for the unofficial policies and practices of racial profiling by criminal justice practitioners.

The cultural, environmental and traditional concepts of communities play a major role in individual psychology, providing profilers with a potential basis for behavioral patterns learned by offenders during their upbringing. They also evaluate the safety of prisons for those incarcerated, as some individuals may be predisposed to recidivism if the prisoners' mental health is not or not adequately addressed. There are many several individual factors contributing to developing a criminal profile that both meets legal requirements and treats profiled individuals humanely.

Comparison to forensics[edit]

See also: Forensic psychology and Forensic psychiatry

The effect of psychosocial factors on brain functioning and behavior is a central part of analysis for both forensic and criminal psychologists, under the category of applied psychology. For forensic psychiatry, major areas of criminal evaluations include assessing the ability of an individual to stand trial, providing an opinion on what the mental state of the individual was at the time of offense, risk management for future offenses (recidivism), providing treatment to criminals including medication and psychotherapy, and being an expert witness. This process often involves psychological testing. Forensic psychologists have largely similar roles to forensic psychiatrists, although are typically unable to prescribe medication. Criminal psychologists focus on research, profiling, and educating/assisting law enforcement with the detainment of suspects.[9]

Criminal and forensic psychologists may also consider the following factors:

  1. The current presence of mental disorders
  2. The level of accountability or responsibility an individual has for a crime due to mental disorders
  3. Likelihood of recidivism and involved risk factors
  4. Epidemiology of related mental disorders under consideration
  5. The motivation behind why a crime was committed.[9]

Criminal psychology is also related to legal psychology, and forensic psychology and crime investigations.

The question of competency to stand trial is a to question of an offender's current state of mind. This assesses the offender's ability to understand the charges against them, the possible outcomes of being convicted/acquitted of these charges and their ability to assist their attorney with their defense. The question of sanity/insanity or criminal responsibility is an assessment of the offender's state of mind at the time of the crime. This refers to their ability to understand right from wrong and what is illegal. The insanity defense is rarely used, as it is very difficult to prove. If declared insane, an offender may be committed to a secure hospital facility, potentially for much longer than they would have served in prison.

Crime prevention[edit]

There are several programs that attempt to straighten out teens and young adults that are already having interactions with the police. There are several programs that attempt to help teens and young adults that are having disciplinary problems and involvement with the law. These programs include Scared Straight, Boot Camps, and rehabilitation.[1] Research shows that these programs are ineffective or that they may even increase the likelihood of participants reoffending. In order for interventions to be effective they have to be a person's choice, and not mandated by the court or other people. In order for these interventions to be effective the person needs to voluntarily accept treatment.[1] Research has shown that the most effective methods for preventing recidivism are Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)[1] or rehabilitation programs that teach skills necessary to continue living after the duration of the programs. leaving these programs.[1] Interventions such as Functional Family Therapy, Group-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Mentorship programs, Multidimensional Family Therapy.[10] There are several therapies that are used to help criminals:

  • Intensive Multimodal Cognitive Therapy
  • Anger Management
  • Motivational Interviewing
  • Dialectical Behavior Therapy
  • Schema Modal Therapy[11]
  • Functional Family Therapy
  • Group-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
  • Mentorship Programs
  • Multidimensional Family Therapy[10]

The goal of these therapies is to help violent offenders cope and avoid committing crimes after being released.[11] Research on in-patient therapy methods showed to not help criminals.[11] There are risk management tools that are used to assess criminals or people who are becoming involved with the law.[11] There is evidence that these tools help with violence and crime, but health professionals have mixed reviews on if they are effective.[11] Research supports that Multisystemic Therapy did not have an effect on preventing crime or reoffending in juveniles.[10]

Different types of mental disorders within the system[edit]

The criminal justice system has a wide variety of people that are incarcerated, some of these people have mental illness or disabilities.[6] Some people that are in the system come from lower socioeconomic status and have childhood trauma that later results in mental illness, and this increases the likelihood of them being involved with the law at a young age.[7][6]

Fetal Alcohol Syndrome is caused by a pregnant mother consuming alcohol. This can cause the individual to have issues with decision-making, substance abuse, and the ability to function. They are more likely to commit crimes around the age of 12, which can include drug offenses, shoplifting, and sex crimes.[5]

Some people with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) are incarcerated, but not more than a neurotypical person. There is a difference though between gender and age.[4] Male teenagers are more likely to have altercations with the law.[4]When the altercations do occur they most often include crime relates to stalking, drugs, theft/property damage.[4]

Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is another mental illness that inmates may have, and this can be co-morbid with other disorders, such as depression, anxiety, substance use and personality disorders.[3] The most common co-morbid disorders among criminals is depression and substance use disorder.[3] The inmates with PTSD are most likely to be violent with other inmates and commit more violent crimes.[3]

Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is another disorder that criminals are likely to have. This disorder can also be co-morbid with disorders like conduct disorder and later on can develop into antisocial personality disorder.[2] People with ADHD often commit crimes such as assault, sex crimes, homicide, and drug charges.[2] After being released from jail/prison people with ADHD are more likely to reoffend quicker than inmates that do not have ADHD.[2]

peer review summary: I deleted information that was crossed out in the different mental disorder section. It confused Druss. He thought they could have been removed and they are sections that I wanted to add. The Stanford experiment that he mentioned I believe is relevant. The past editor added it and I think it is okay to be included here, and doesn't need to be removed. Chcam1 suggested that I link some information to other wiki pages and so I have linked to the scared straight page, fetal alcohol syndrome, cognitive behavioral therapy. I changed the wording in the sentence about educating and assisting police as suggested. I had struggled with the wording and this suggestion helped. Reworded the crime prevention section as suggested. For the section about disorders I have thought about adding the other disorders. I added info about people with autism as she suggested.

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e Barnett, Georgia D.; Fitzalan Howard, Flora (2018-05-01). "What Doesn't Work to Reduce Reoffending?". European Psychologist. 23 (2): 111–129. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000323. ISSN 1016-9040.
  2. ^ a b c d Retz, Wolfgang; Ginsberg, Ylva; Turner, Daniel; Barra, Steffen; Retz-Junginger, Petra; Larsson, Henrik; Asherson, Phil (2021-01-01). "Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), antisociality and delinquent behavior over the lifespan". Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 120: 236–248. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.11.025. ISSN 0149-7634.
  3. ^ a b c d Facer-Irwin, Emma; Blackwood, Nigel J.; Bird, Annie; Dickson, Hannah; McGlade, Daniel; Alves-Costa, Filipa; MacManus, Deirdre (2019-09-26). "PTSD in prison settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comorbid mental disorders and problematic behaviours". PLOS ONE. 14 (9): e0222407. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0222407. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 6762063. PMID 31557173.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  4. ^ a b c d King, Claire; Murphy, Glynis H. (2014-11-01). "A Systematic Review of People with Autism Spectrum Disorder and the Criminal Justice System". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 44 (11): 2717–2733. doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2046-5. ISSN 1573-3432.
  5. ^ a b Flannigan, Katherine; Pei, Jacqueline; Stewart, Michelle; Johnson, Alexandra (2018-03-01). "Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder and the criminal justice system: A systematic literature review". International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 57: 42–52. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.12.008. ISSN 0160-2527.
  6. ^ a b c Folk, Johanna; Kemp, Kathlene; Yurasek, Allison; Barr-Walker, Jill; Tolou-Shams, Marina (2021). "Supplemental Material for Adverse Childhood Experiences Among Justice-Involved Youth: Data-Driven Recommendations for Action Using the Sequential Intercept Model". American Psychologist. doi:10.1037/amp0000769.supp. ISSN 0003-066X.
  7. ^ a b Baranyi, Gergő; Scholl, Carolin; Fazel, Seena; Patel, Vikram; Priebe, Stefan; Mundt, Adrian (2018). "Severe Mental Illness and Substance Use Disorders in Prisoners in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence Studies". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3235631. ISSN 1556-5068.
  8. ^ Fox, Bryanna; Farrington, David P. (August 21, 2018). "What have we learned from offender profiling? A systematic review and meta-analysis of 40 years of research". Psychological Bulletin. 144 (12): 1247–1274. doi:10.1037/bul0000170. ISSN 1939-1455.
  9. ^ a b Singh, Dinesh (March 2018). "Criminal Psychology and its importance: A Review" (PDF). Innovative Research Thoughts. 4 (1): 218–222.
  10. ^ a b c Olsson, Tina M.; Långström, Niklas; Skoog, Therése; Andrée Löfholm, Cecilia; Leander, Lina; Brolund, Agneta; Ringborg, Anna; Nykänen, Pia; Syversson, Anneth; Sundell, Knut (June 2021). "Systematic review and meta-analysis of noninstitutional psychosocial interventions to prevent juvenile criminal recidivism". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 89 (6): 514–527. doi:10.1037/ccp0000652. ISSN 1939-2117.
  11. ^ a b c d e Papalia, Nina; Spivak, Benjamin; Daffern, Michael; Ogloff, James R. P. (February 2019). "A meta‐analytic review of the efficacy of psychological treatments for violent offenders in correctional and forensic mental health settings". Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 26 (2). doi:10.1111/cpsp.12282. ISSN 1468-2850.