User:Rachelbernstein/Hunger in the United Kingdom/JBecker370 Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

• Whose work are you reviewing? Rachelbernstein
• Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Rachelbernstein/Hunger in the United Kingdom

Lead is presumed to be relevant.

Content

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added relevant to the topic? No clear explanation of content that will be added.
• Is the content added up-to-date?
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation

Seems unclear to what you will be adding. No specific details or information is included. However, it seems more like an overview of what you think you can add to the article, instead of any specifics.

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added neutral?
• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
• Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation

As what content will be added isn't clear, its hard to tell if it is well balanced.

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
• Are the sources current?
• Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation

No sources were given.

Organization

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
• Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation

Sentence structure seems choppy, and is not particularly clear. Main idea of what you may do however is noticeable.

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

• Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? No, although the ideas can lead to improving the article.
• What are the strengths of the content added?
• How can the content added be improved? Be more specific in what you are going to add, including which sections of the article you are going to work on and what details you are going to add.

Overall evaluation

What you will be adding is not clear. No specific information or detail is given. There are some good ideas that can be looked into more, that will help to improve your article. Good job so far!