User:Rachelswimmer/Education in peru/Salliejohnson99 Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

• Whose work are you reviewing?

Rachelswimmer

• Link to draft you're reviewing:

User:Rachelswimmer/sandbox

Lead

Guiding questions:

• Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?

no

• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?

yes

• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?

yes

• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?

no

• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

good length

Lead evaluation

overall lead is helpful for introducing topics of discussion in the article

Content

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added relevant to the topic?

Yes

• Is the content added up-to-date?

Yes, mentions of success in 2018

• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

No

Content evaluation

All added content seems relevant and constructive

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added neutral?

Yes

• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

The section under "Challenges in the Peruvian education system" starting with the sentence "The expanded access to private education has increased educational inequalities in more ways than one" comes across as biased against private education, especially since it doesn't have a source. Maybe add some data if you can find any to support the claims you make, and try changing the wording around a bit.

• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

I would try and address the government's reasoning for their decisions a bit more.

• Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Maybe

Tone and balance evaluation

Some parts of the section "Challenges in the Peruvian education system" come across as biased so just watch out for your tone or try and address the reasons Peru decided to move toward private education.

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?

Yes

• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?

Yes

• Are the sources current?

Yes

• Check a few links. Do they work?

Yes

Sources and references evaluation

A lot of your citations are repeated, might be useful to check and make sure you're clicking the "reuse citation" option when uploading final draft to the actual article.

Organization

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?

Yes

• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?

A few minor typos in the last paragraph of the second section added.

• Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Yes, I think the new sections are helpful for the overall structure

Organization evaluation

Will your quality of education section be added to the pre-existing quality section or is it different? might be necessary to reconsider the naming of the two sections if they are meant to be separate.

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

no images added

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
• Are images well-captioned?
• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

• Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
• How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
• Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
• Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

• Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
• What are the strengths of the content added?
• How can the content added be improved?