User:Rainer.schamel/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Schamel equation (S-equation) is a nonlinear partial differential equation of first order in time and third order in space. Similar to a Korteweg de Vries (KdV) equation [1], it describes the development of a localized, coherent wave structure that propagates in a nonlinear dispersive medium. It was first derived in 1973 by Hans Schamel [2] to describe the effects of electron trapping in the trough of the potential of a solitary electrostatic wave structure travelling with ion acoustic speed in a two-component plasma. It now applies to various localized pulse dynamics such as:

  • electron and ion holes or phase space vortices in collision-free plasmas such as space plasmas [3],
  • axisymmetric pulse propagation in physically stiffened nonlinear cylindrical shells [4],
  • "Soliton" propagation in nonlinear transmission lines [5] or in fiber optics and laser physics [6].

The equation[edit]

The Schamel equation is [2]


where stands for . In the case of ion-acoustic solitary waves, the parameter reflects the effect of electrons trapped in the trough of the electrostatic potential . It is given by , where , the trapping parameter, reflects the status of the trapped electrons, representing a flat-topped stationary trapped electron distribution, a dip or depression. It holds , where is the wave amplitude. All quantities are normalized: the potential energy by electron thermal energy, the velocity by ion sound speed, time by inverse ion plasma frequency and space by electron Debye length. Note that for a KdV equation is replaced by such that the nonlinearity becomes bilinear (see later).

Solitary wave solution[edit]

The steady state solitary wave solution, , is given in the comoving frame by:


.

The speed of the structure is supersonic, , since has to be positive, , which corresponds in the ion acoustic case to a depressed trapped electron distribution [2][7].

Proof by pseudo-potential method[edit]

The proof of this solution uses the analogy to classical mechanics via
with , being the corresponding pseudo-potential. From this we get by an integration: , which represents the pseudo-energy, and from the Schamel equation: . Through the obvious demand, namely that at potential maximum, , the slope of vanishes we get: . This is a nonlinear dispersion relation (NDR) because it determines the phase velocity given by the second expression. The canonical form of is obtained by replacing with the NDR. It becomes:
.

The use of this expression in , which follows from the pseudo-energy law, yields by integration:

.

This is the inverse function of as given in the first equation. Note that the integral in the denominator of exists and can be expressed by known mathematical functions. Hence is a mathematically disclosed function. However, the structure often remains mathematically undisclosed, i.e. it cannot be expressed by known functions. This happens if more than one trapping scenarios are involved, as e.g. in driven intermittent plasma turbulence [8].

Non-integrability[edit]

In contrast to the KdV equation, the Schamel equation is an example of a non-integrable evolution equation. It only has a finite number of (polynomial) constants of motion [9] and does not pass a Painlev test [4][10]. Since a so-called Lax pair (L,P) does not exist [11], it is not integrable by the inverse scattering transform [12].

Generalizations[edit]

Schamel-Korteweg de Vries equation[edit]

Taking into account the next order in the expression for the expanded electron density, we get , from which we obtain the pseudo-potential -. The corresponding evolution equation then becomes:

,

which is the Schamel-Korteweg de Vries equation.

Its solitary wave solution reads [13]


with and . Depending on Q it has two limitating solitary wave solutions: For we find , the Schamel solitary wave.
For we get which represents the ordinary ion acoustic soliton. The latter is fluid-like and is achieved for or representing an isothermal electron equation of state. Note that the absence of a trapping effect (b=0) does not imply the absence of trapping, a statement that is usually misrepresented in the literature, especially in textbooks. As long as is nonzero, there is always a nonzero trapping width in velocity space for the electron distribution function.

Logarithmic Schamel equation[edit]

Another generalization of the S-equation is obtained in the case of ion acoustic waves by admitting a second trapping channel. By considering an additional, non-perturbative trapping scenario, Schamel [8] received:

,

a generalization called logarithmic S-equation. In the absence of the square root nonlinearity, , it is solved by a Gaussian shaped hole solution: with and has a supersonic phase velocity
. The corresponding pseudo-potential is given by . From this follows which is the inverse function of the Gaussian mentioned. It should be noted that for a non-zero b, keeping , the integral to get can no longer be solved analytically, i.e. by known mathematical functions. A solitary wave structure still exists, but cannot be reached in a disclosed form.

Schamel equation with random coefficients[edit]

The fact that electrostatic trapping involves stochastic processes at resonance caused by chaotic particle trajectories has led to considering b in the S-equation as a stochastic quantity. This results in a Wick-type stochastic S-equation [14][15].

Time-fractional Schamel equation[edit]

A further generalization is obtained by replacing the first time derivative by a Riesz fractional derivative yielding a time-fractional S-equation [16][17]. It has applications e.g. for the broadband electrostatic noise observed by the Viking satellite [17].

Schamel-Schrödinger equation[edit]

A connection between the Schamel equation and the nonlinear Schrödinger equation can be made within the context of a Madelung fluid [18]. It results in the Schamel-Schrödinger equation [6].


and has applications in fiber optics [19] and laser physics [20].

References[edit]

  1. ^ D. J. Korteweg and G. de Vries, Phil.Mag. 39(1895)422
  2. ^ a b c H. Schamel, J. Plasma Phys. 9(1973)377
  3. ^ H. Schamel, Phys. Reports 140(1986)161
  4. ^ a b A. I. Zemlyanukhin, I.V. Andrianov, A. V. Bochkarev and L. I. Mogilevich, Nonlinear Dynamics 98(2019)185
  5. ^ F. Aziz, A. Asif and F. Bint-e-Munir, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 134(2020)109737
  6. ^ a b S. Phibanchon and M. A. Allen, International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 6(2012)18
  7. ^ H. Schamel, Plasma Physics 14(1972)905
  8. ^ a b H. Schamel, Plasma 3(2020)166
  9. ^ F. Verheest and W. Hereman, Phys. Scr. 50(1994)611
  10. ^ R. Conte and M. Musette: The Painlevé Handbook, Springer, New-York (2008)
  11. ^ P. Lax, Comm. Pure Applied Math. 21(1968)467
  12. ^ C. S. Gardner, J. M. Greene, M. D. Kruskal and R. M. Miura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19(1967)1095
  13. ^ H. Schamel, Plasma Phys. 14(1972)905
  14. ^ A.-H. Abdel-Aty, M. M. A. Khater, A. M. Zidan and R.A. M. Attia, J. Information Science and Engineering 36(2020)1279
  15. ^ X. Wang, Y. Shang and H. Di, Hindawi Advances in Mathematical Physics, Volume 2017, Article ID 4647838
  16. ^ S. A. El-Wakil, E. M. Abulwafa, E. K. El-Shewy and A. A. Mahmoud, Phys. Plasmas 18(2011)092116
  17. ^ a b S. Guo, L. Mei, Y. He and Y. Li, Physics Letters A 380(2016)1031
  18. ^ R. Fedele, H. Schamel and P. K. Shukla, Phys. Scripta vol. T98(2002)18
  19. ^ G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, New York: Academic Press, 2001
  20. ^ R. K. Bullough, P. M. Jack, P. W. Kitchenside and R. Saunders, "Solitons in laser physics", Phys. Scr. 20(1979)364










BACKUP


Literatur[edit]

  • Autor: Titel. Verlag, Ort Jahr, ISBN.
  • Autor: Titel. Verlag, Ort Jahr, ISBN, S. X–Y.
  • Herausgeber (Hrsg.): Titel (= Reihe. Band). x. Auflage. Verlag, Ort Jahr, ISBN.
  • Autor: Titel. In: Herausgeber (Hrsg.): Sammelwerk (= Reihe. Band). Verlag, Ort Jahr, ISBN, S. X–Y ([http:// online]).
  • Autor X, Autor Y: Titel. Untertitel. In: Zeitschrift. Band/Jahrgang, Nr. X, Jahr, ISSN 0000-0000, S. X–Y ([http:// PDF; 1,1 MB]).
  • Autor: Titel. Herausgegeben von Herausgeber. Verlag, Ort Jahr, ISBN.

Literature[edit]

[1] D. J. Korteweg and G. de Vries, Phil.Mag. 39(1895)422
[2] H. Schamel, J. Plasma Phys. 9(1973)377
[3] H. Schamel, Phys. Reports 140(1986)161
[4] A. I. Zemlyanukhin, I.V. Andrianov, A. V. Bochkarev and L. I. Mogilevich, Nonlinear Dynamics 98(2019)185
[5] F. Aziz, A. Asif and F. Bint-e-Munir, Chaos, Solitons \& Fractals 134(2020)109737
[6] S. Phibanchon and M. A. Allen, International Scholarly and Scientific Research \& Innovation 6(2012)18
[7] H. Schamel, Plasma Physics 14(1972)905
[8] H. Schamel, Plasma 3(2020)166
[9] F. Verheest and W. Hereman, Phys. Scr. 50(1994)611
[10] R. Conte and M. Musette: The Painlev\acute e Handbook, Springer, New-York (2008)
[11] P. Lax, Comm. Pure Applied Math. 21(1968)467
[12] C. S. Gardner, J. M. Greene, M. D. Kruskal and R. M. Miura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19(1967)1095
[13] H. Schamel, Plasma Phys. 14(1972)905
[14] A.-H. Abdel-Aty, M. M. A. Khater, A. M. Zidan and R.A. M. Attia, J. Information Science and Engineering 36(2020)1279
[15] X. Wang, Y. Shang and H. Di, Hindawi Advances in Mathematical Physics, Volume 2017, Article ID 4647838
[16] S. A. El-Wakil, E. M. Abulwafa, E. K. El-Shewy and A. A. Mahmoud, Phys. Plasmas 18(2011)092116
[17] S. Guo, L. Mei, Y. He and Y. Li, Physics Letters A 380(2016)1031
[18] R. Fedele, H. Schamel and P. K. Shukla, Phys. Scripta vol. T98(2002)18
[19] G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, New York: Academic Press, 2001
[20] R. K. Bullough, P. M. Jack, P. W. Kitchenside and R. Saunders, "Solitons in laser physics", Phys. Scr. 20(1979)364


Electron and ion holes

...is coming soon

http://indico.ictp.it/event/a04206/session/51/contribution/34/material/0/1.pdf https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0370157386900438 https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.00119 https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.06079

Latex-Symbole: https://oeis.org/wiki/List_of_LaTeX_mathematical_symbols Ausprobieren von Latex Code: https://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php

Sack-Schamel Equation

Schamel Equation