User talk:Reeeeet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User:Reeeeet)
Jump to: navigation, search

surprised[edit]

I'm surprised that your last edit was flagged by huggle. Don't worry, though, you will be whitelisted, so this shouldn't happen again. Quinxorin (talk) 06:38, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks very much. Huggle looks really cool, a few false positives notwithstanding. :-) Reeeeet (talk) 06:46, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Minor edits and the preview button[edit]

Please do not mark edits where you actually substantively change text as minor as you have done regularly. Please read WP:MINOR for more on when it is ok to do so. Also, rather than making several edits in very, very short succession, please consider using the "Show preview" button to see how an edit will look, or use a sandbox. The rapid-fire editing tends to clog up watchlists and raise red flags. Thank you and happy editing! Novaseminary (talk) 03:54, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

GNOME Fallback[edit]

I have changed your edit to GNOME Fallback on the GNOME article, as the source does show that the majority of the features from the old GNOME panel were indeed ported over. Your edit rationale says that "The source does not support "nearly all", and that is so - no right click, no compatibility with years worth of GNOME 2 panel widgets; thus "some" is more accurate", yet the functionality supplied by right clicking is still there, only now you need to alt-rightclick, as is explained in the source. The panel in GNOME 3 is still just as extendible as it was in GNOME 2, and yes Bonoboo applets no longer work, but they only worked in later versions of GNOME 2 because of a kludged compatibility layer. All of the official GNOME applets and many of the more recent unofficial ones should still work, and using the new framework many more in theory can be created. However, to be diplomatic, I did not simply revert your edit, instead I changed the wording to say that "The Fallback mode has most of the same features as the old GNOME Panel". I can not really see how anyone can debate that wording. Hamish Paul Wilson (talk) 18:28, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Apologist much? Reeeeet (talk) 06:29, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Duke-st-rollins-logo.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Duke-st-rollins-logo.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:45, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Uberstudent-1.0-education-menu.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Uberstudent-1.0-education-menu.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. TLSuda (talk) 14:56, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ben Dreyfuss, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Wanderers and Mother Jones. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Reeeeet. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)