User:Riyarajani/HomelesswomenintheUnitedStates
Feminization of Poverty
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b7/Dorothea_Lange%2C_Homeless_mother_and_child_near_Brawley%2C_California%2C_1939.jpg/220px-Dorothea_Lange%2C_Homeless_mother_and_child_near_Brawley%2C_California%2C_1939.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e0/Homeless_woman_in_Washington%2C_D.C..jpg/220px-Homeless_woman_in_Washington%2C_D.C..jpg)
When the UN declared the world “Homeless Crisis” in the mid-1980s, it set the stage for the politicized “feminization of poverty” discourse that had developed from initial research efforts on female poverty and homelessness (add citation). In the United States, during this time, the Reagan administration instituted various policies that affected the welfare of women. "Reaganomics" was a term used to describe the policy reforms of Reagan, encompassing sharp cuts in social welfare programs, deregulation, tax cuts, and reduction of government spending[1]. This led to what became known as the feminization of poverty, which drew attention to gender disparities in poverty rates, where more women find themselves in impoverished conditions compared to men. This trend emanates from a host of gender disparities and socioeconomic hardships women bear disproportionately. Among the cut programs were such vital programs as Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), the food stamp program, medicare, and housing aid subsidies[1]. Additionally, cuts to services like daycare, abortion, and family planning, which were essential for many women's economic autonomy, further exacerbated the challenges faced by marginalized communities, leading to a higher number of women falling into poverty. Not only that, but even the policies for women in the workplace changed in this period, as there was deregulation of agencies like the Equal Opportunities Commission and the Administration of Occupational Health and Safety. Reagan cut funding to these agencies, leaving many women vulnerable in their places of work to discrimination, harassment, and unsafe working conditions[1]. Initial liberal discourse on the feminization of poverty interpreted women's poverty to be the result of male irresponsibility. Feminists also proposed the idea that the gender-based wage gap was contributing to this dilemma of women's poverty in the United States and argued that women should be seen as equal to men in relation to their ability to succeed when supported with the proper resources.[2] This idea increased in popularity through the 80's and 90's in the US where households headed by single mothers were increasingly more at risk for experiencing poverty and homelessness.[3] Homeless families make up one third of the homeless population in America, with single-mother families being the highest sub category. Among homeless women, there is an overrepresentation of adults with sole responsibility of care of dependent children and inadequate financial resources. Women, especially single-parent family mothers, are more likely to live in poverty when they have children and have to balance earning money while raising and caring for their children.[4] Children with a single mother are five times more likely to be in poverty than children with two parents.[5] Single mothers are more likely to work part-time and to miss work in order to care for their children. Many homeless and low income women work in service industries, which offer few benefits and low wages, thus contributing greatly to their poverty. Job-based discrimination targets all women but is present on a larger scale among minority women. On average, a larger percentage of minority women struggle to obtain and maintain jobs. The "last-hired, first-fired complex" refers to the higher level of unemployment among minorities. Thus, while all women are faced with some degree of inequity in terms of job offerings (largely as a result of being expected to care for the children), the struggles of minority women are greater.[6] Paid employment for women also offers its own challenges because most low-wage jobs don't offer affordable insurance options or child care. This leaves single mothers with the choice of accepting welfare if they are able to qualify for it in order to care for their children or going to work at the risk of leaving their children on the streets.[7]
- ^ a b c Abramovitz, Mimi, and Tom Hopkins. (November 1983). ""Reaganomics and the Welfare State."". Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare. 10 (4): 563–578 – via Heinonline.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Cite error: The named reference
:32
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Dodson, Lisa (1999). Don't Call Us Out of Name: The Untold Lives of Women and Girls in Poor America. Beacon Press. ISBN 978-0-8070-4209-0.[page needed]
- ^ McLaughlin, Thomas Chalmers. "Women and Homelessness Understanding Risk Factors and Strategies for Recovery. Preble Street Reports". Retrieved 22 Sep 2013.
- ^ Bussiere, Alice; Freedman, Henry; Manning, Dan; Mihaly, Lisa; Morales, James (1991). "Homeless Women and Children". Clearinghouse Review. 25 (4): 431.
- ^ Weller, Fields, Christian, Jaryn. "The Black and White Labor Gap in America Why African Americans Struggle to Find Jobs and Remain Employed Compared to Whites". Center for American Progress. Retrieved 8 Dec 2013.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Belle, Deborah; Doucet, Joanne (June 2003). "Poverty, Inequality, and Discrimination as Sources of Depression Among U.S. Women". Psychology of Women Quarterly. 27 (2): 101–113. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00090. S2CID 142596447.