User:Royalguard11/Desk/archive/Case 3

This case page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the talk page.

The following is an archived discussion between an advocate and an advocee. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Tmonome

Hello Royalguard11.

Thank you so very much for taking my case.

I do understand that my problem is more with form that it is with content, and I am not happy with how the article reads, but was hoping for help in bringing it to Wikipedia style and standards.

As you have seen from the discussion page, I am not shy to work on this, and indeed have been sited for defending it too much, but I know my style is wrong for this site, yet I feel the topic is worthy of an entry, if presented in proper style. It is not meant to be ady, just informative, but I do get your point fully. How to fix it is another thing all together.

How to differentiate between, ‘the fact’ that something is an opinion, the public reaction, the Wikipedia search engine test, the concept of notability and how this is not a steadfast rule, there is so much I do not understand.

Would it be too much to ask if you might try editing the page, and perhaps if questions arise, or you feel certain things need clarifying, you could relate that to me and I would do my best to help find informatin needed.

I know this is a lot to ask of you, but I feel I lack the style this needs, and probably would take me years to acquire. I bow to your better judgement.

faithfully

Tmonome

Other talk took place on advocees' talk page, see this diff. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk) 23:19, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

The above is an archived discussion between an advocate and an advocee. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.