User:Ryal1ll/Chamba people /Laylakeysor Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

• Whose work are you reviewing? Ryal1ll
• Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Ryal1ll/Chamba people

Lead

Guiding questions:

• Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? yes the article didn't have alead originally so the one that has been added give a concise short definition of the chamba.
• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?yes
• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? This is missing it may be nice to include a short sentence to describe what the rest of the article talks about.
• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? yes the information that is in the lead may also work in the society and culture or languages sections.
• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?concise

Content

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes
• Is the content added up-to-date?yes
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? the introductory section on the art of the chamba people is a very short sentence it may be beneficial to add something here that better introduces the subtopics

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added neutral?yes
• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?no
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?no
• Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?no

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?yes
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?yes
• Are the sources current? yes
• Check a few links. Do they work?yes

Organization

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? there are a few small errors for example the lead reads "The Chamba people are a significant ethnic groups in the north eastern Nigeria" when it should read groups and in the language section you've written that the land was divided between "British and France" when it should either read Britain and France, or, the British and French
• Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?yes

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?yes
• Are images well-captioned?yes
• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? not sure
• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? putting the image directly under the header with the info to its right or all the way to the right of the information with the info under the header would be a cleaner layout

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

• Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
• How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
• Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
• Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

• Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? yes however i do think some section could be expanded upon even further to really fill the article in
• What are the strengths of the content added? the content added provides information about the art of the region and also creates an organizational layout for the info that was already there
• How can the content added be improved? the content added could be further expanded