User:SJ20022004/Culture of Nepal/Red2183 Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

• Whose work are you reviewing? User:SJ20022004/sandbox
• Link to draft you're reviewing: User:SJ20022004/sandbox

Lead

Guiding questions:

• Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes it is relevant to the topic but it needs more information added to it still.
• Is the content added up-to-date? Yes it looks like it is up to date from what I have seen
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Yes their is still a lot of content missing because you have not said much about the culture of Nepal you only gave a little bit and it could use some more information added to it.

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added neutral? yes it is neutral !!
• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No because it is neutral therefore it is not biased
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Yes the culture of Nepal is underrepresented because their was not much information given.
• Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No because their is not enough information to pursued the reader.

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? I did not see your sources on your sandbox
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? I did not see your sources on your sandbox
• Are the sources current? I did not see your sources on your sandbox
• Check a few links. Do they work? I did not see your sources on your sandbox

Organization

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? it is easy to read and clear but not enough
• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? I didn't see any
• Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? no not really

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
• Are images well-captioned?
• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

• Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
• How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
• Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
• Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

• Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
• What are the strengths of the content added?
• How can the content added be improved?