User:Saifnasr25/Painting of the Six Kings/Bibliography

You will be compiling your bibliography and creating an outline of the changes you will make in this sandbox.

Bibliography

As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:

Is the source from a reliable publication?
- Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking.
- Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts.
Is the source verifiable?
- In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source.
Is the source independent of the subject?
- Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations.
- For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person's webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent.
Is the source primary or secondary?
- Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content.
- Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge.
- Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia.
If you're working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow these special guidelines.
If you're creating a new article, consider the following:
- Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
- In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you're writing about.
- Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations.
- Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don't count towards the notability requirement.
- Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about living persons. Please follow these carefully.
- Wikipedia has a series of guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you're trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully.

If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia's sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert.

Get Help

Bibliography

Edit this section to compile the bibliography for your Wikipedia assignment. Add the name and/or notes about what each source covers, then use the "Cite" button to generate the citation for that source.

Cerulli, E. (1988). Ethiopia’s relations with the Muslim World . essay, University of California Press.

Source shows Muslim- Ethiopian relations

Drayson, E. (2006). Ways of seeing: The first medieval Islamic and Christian depictions of Roderick, last visigothic king of Spain. Al-Masāq, 18(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/09503110600863443

Talks about inclusion of Roderic in painting

El-Cheikh, N. M. (1999). Muhammad and heraclius: A study in legitimacy. Studia Islamica, (89), 5. https://doi.org/10.2307/1596083

Talk about relationship between Romans and Arabs

Fowden, G. (2004). Quṣayr ʻamra art and the Umayyad elite in late antique syria. University of California Press.

Goes into great depth about the description of the Painting of Six Kings

Gibb, H. A. R. (2017). Arab-Byzantine relations under the Umayyad Caliphate. Arab-Byzantine Relations in Early Islamic Times, 65–79. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315262284-3

Goes into the nuances of Arab-Byzantine relations

Grabar, O. (1954). The Painting of the Six Kings at Quṣayr ’Amrah. Ars Orientalis, 1, 185–187.

Had a really good section on the different interpretations of the Painting of Six Kings

Grabar, O. (2023). Umayyad Palaces Reconsidered. Early Islamic Art, 650–1100, 187–212. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003418498-14

Gives great context about Qasr Amra

Hillenbrand, R. (1982). La Dolce Vita in early Islamic Syria: The evidence of later Umayyad palaces. s.n.

Gives great context about Qasr Amra
Talks about how Qasr Amra was built by al-Walid II

Kaegi, W. E. (1969). Initial byzantine reactions to the Arab conquest. Church History, 38(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.2307/3162702

Gives good background on Arab-Byzantine wars and their locations

References

Outline of proposed changes

Outline

Lead
- make it flow better
Location and Origin
- Clean up and address the issue about who built Qasr Amra
Description
- Use Fowden Journal article to go deeper into analysis of painting
Interpreation
- Talk about meaning (meaning is very disputed)
- Talk about naming convention
- Talk about contact with other empires and civilizations