User:Simfish/Math

ip test

Old Today, 06:56 PM  	   #9 (permalink)

KingOfTheRiver New Member

Join Date: Nov 2007 Threads: 1 Posts: 0

Quote: It took you 22 years of your life to realize that you haven't had sex? man I knowed that I didnt had sex but I didnt know why? there was something in mea that was telling me no

and how cares now, 3 more days and Im on Mt.Everest KingOfTheRiver is offline Report Problem Post Reply KingOfTheRiver View Public Profile Send a private message to KingOfTheRiver Send email to KingOfTheRiver Find More Posts by KingOfTheRiver Add KingOfTheRiver to Your Buddy List Unread Today, 07:09 PM #10 (permalink) InquilineKea Member

Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Redmond,WA (formerly known as simfish) Threads: 456 Posts: 895 Send a message via AIM to InquilineKea

OHMYGOD

what drugs are you taking man?

man, just email me and lets be friends!111

oh and plz register at HeavenGames and post there too! the people would love you there InquilineKea is online now

== CT:

CT:

(a) $m_{2}g=m_{1}(\mu _{k}\cos \theta +g\sin \theta )$

(b) $m_{2}g=m_{1}((g\sin \theta -\mu _{k}\cos \theta ))$

(c) Lower bound: m_1 pulls on m_2 (b) upper bound: m_2 pulls on m_1. (a)

static friction ALWAYS is higher than kinetic friction, so this narrows down the bonds. So...m_2 is between

${\frac {m_{1}(\mu _{s}\cos \theta +g\sin \theta )}{g}}$ and ${\frac {m_{1}((g\sin \theta -\mu _{s}\cos \theta )}{g}}$

=

$I={\begin{bmatrix}1&0\\0&1\end{bmatrix}}J={\begin{bmatrix}i&0\\0&-i\end{bmatrix}}K={\begin{bmatrix}0&1\\-1&0\end{bmatrix}}L={\begin{bmatrix}0&i\\i&0\end{bmatrix}}$

=

The diagrams:

${\frac {{C_{s}}^{2}}{{C_{a}}^{2}}}$

$\theta _{B_{n}}$

$c_{s}=({\frac {\gamma p}{\rho }})^{\frac {1}{2}}$

$p=nkT$

$\lambda _{D}=({\frac {\epsilon _{0}k_{B}T_{e}}{n_{e}e^{2}}})^{\frac {1}{2}}$

$\theta _{B_{n}}=0$

$\theta _{B_{n}}=90^{\circ }$

$0^{\circ }<\theta _{B_{n}}<45^{\circ }$

$45^{\circ }<\theta _{B_{n}}<90^{\circ }$

$\theta _{B_{n}}=0$

${\frac {1}{R^{2}}}$

Voyager 1 Crosses a New Frontier and May Save Itself From Termination - Science Magazine

Ah nice title

multiple hypotheses: if one fails, u have other choices.

FOr example, info transfer.

E-mail, xanga, and facebook are blocked due to security restrictions. But I still have access to my invisionfree forums and Wiki account for info transfer.

http://www.oulu.fi/~spaceweb/lib/education.html

http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/~cairns/teaching/lecture20/node4.html

=

Morality: even though there is no reason why I have to lie, I still hve to develop a reputation for telling the truth even when it's painful so people are more likely to accept my biographical details and research results. See, morality without religion. Approval ratings: so I saw Castro had 47%. And aren't most of them brainwashed?

== Sleep deprivation => helps depression Food deprivation => forces mitochondria build-up, decrease insulin resistance

== Ivan: never look at humanity out of context or you'll die laughing yes, everything goes. YES THAT'S A WORLD VIEW

$\int _{0}^{\pi /2}\sin x\cos xdx$

$\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }{\frac {nx^{n+2}}{(n+2)!}}$

$x^{3}\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }{\frac {nx^{n-1}}{(n+2)!}}$

$x^{3}\left(\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }{\frac {nx^{n}}{(n+2)!}}\right)'$

$x^{3}\left(\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }{\frac {nx^{n+2}}{(n+2)!}}\right)'$

$x^{3}\left({\frac {1}{x^{2}}}\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }{\frac {x^{n+2}}{(n+2)!}}\right)'$

$x^{3}\left({\frac {1}{x^{2}}}e^{x+2}\right)'$

$x^{3}\left({\frac {1}{x^{2}}}e^{x+2}-{\frac {2}{x^{3}}}e^{x+2}\right)$

$\left.(x-2)e^{x+2}\right.$

$\lim _{x\to \infty }f(x)=0$

${\frac {1}{x^{2}}}$

${\frac {1}{x}}$

${\dot {\imath }}$

${\ddot {\imath }}$

${\dot {\jmath }}$

$\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }$ ∇

=

attributing ur success to God when so many poor people remain unsuccessful => solipism

While Magnetohydrodynamics is technically used for fluids with collisions, . MHD is uncannily accurate in describing plasma behavior. The solar wind beyond 10 solar radii (=0.0464912633 AU) is completely collisionles. Nonetheless, MHD models describe its velocity, temperature, and density well, including shock waves.

While the appropriate theory for collisionless plasmas is kinetic plasma theory derived from Vlaslov's equation, the Vlaslov's equation is far more mathematically complex than MHD, so usually confined to calculating effective transport coefficients and modeling localized effects such as shock structure.

This is because both ideal MHD and collisionless systems have many similarities. Among them include the conservation of mass, momentum and energy. Dissipation processes, rare in collisionless processes, are cases when ideal MHD becomes problematic. Moreover, collisionless plasmas that contain particles undergoing gyro-motion with dominating ExB drift will obey ideal MHD Ohm's law where the magnetic field will be frozen into the plasma.

==

$\sum _{x=1}^{\infty }\left({e^{{x}^{-1}}}-1\right)$

$1+{\frac {1}{x}}+{\frac {1}{2!*x^{2}}}+{\frac {1}{3!*x^{3}}}+...$