User:Snorlax1996/sandbox

Title: Philosophy of artificial intelligence

Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_artificial_intelligence

Summary: The article describes how the philosophy of artificial intelligence tries answer 3 questions “Can machine act intelligently? Are human intelligence and machine intelligence the same? Can a machine have a mind, mental states, and consciousness in the same way that a human being can?” To illustrate if a machine can act intelligently and be able to solve problem that a person would solve by thinking there was an experiment called the “turning test”. This is where a machine would talk through a chatroom style messaging method to a person and if that person could not tell that they are talking to a machine then that machine is consider to be intelligent. People argued that no way human intelligence and machine intelligence can be the same. While some agree that it is possible since human way of thinking is a kind of symbol manipulation and machine can also do that as well, but on a computationally. As for can machine have a mind, consciousness and mental states. There are many different arguments that shows that we really do not have a definite answer to what exactly does that entail. The article then took an interesting route of trying to challenge whether a machine can really have a mental state through poking at holes the previous experiments. For example, in they talked about the turning test experiment again, but this time the machine was put in a different language environment to see if anything would change. The conclusion was that no matter how you program a computer it will not understand Chinese it would only simulate what it knows. Which is really intelligent

Everything that are in this article is appropriate and contained reliable references. Most of the what are in the article are relevant to article. However, there was one part where the article briefly talked about a fictional manga series “ghost in a shell” in the consciousness section. For anyone who have not read it, that reference would be odd and feel out place. Overall the article seems neutral, it contains claimed of scientists who supported the idea that AI can be the same as human intelligence, while there were parts where it was refuting that point as well. The information that are in the article came from a wide variety of sources. Such as, books, newspaper articles, conferences, and research publishing. No I feel like all of the viewpoints were equally covered in the article. All of the links in the article works. And there is no close paraphrasing in the article. No there is no information that are out of date.  

Title: Anime

Link: Anime

Evaluation: This article was very well written and informative. However certain sections of the article were outdated and needed to be updated.

Contribution: added a sentence in the history section which describe the latest major Anime accomplishment. Also added a source for this.