User:Soccermonkey3

Im intrested in editing the seperation of powers article

sandbox

/sandbox Please read: A Thank You from Wikipedia Founder Jimmy Wales Read now

Separation of powers From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 (Redirected from Seperation of powers)

"Balance of powers" redirects here. For other uses, see Balance of power.

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. It needs additional references or sources for verification. Tagged since March 2010. It may require general cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Tagged since March 2010.

This article is part of the Politics series Politics List of political topics Politics by country Politics by subdivision Political economy Political history Political history of the world Political philosophy Political science Political system Federacy Feudalism Monarchy Parliamentary Presidential Semi-presidential Capitalist Communist Anarchist Mixed economy City-state Dictatorship Directorial International relations (theory) Political scientists Comparative politics Public administration Bureaucracy Street-level bureaucracy Adhocracy Public policy (Legal doctrine) Public interest Separation of powers Legislature Executive Judiciary Electoral branch Sovereignty Theories of political behavior Subseries Elections Electoral systems Voting Federalism Form of government Ideology Political campaigning Political parties Politics portal v • d • e The separation of powers is a model for the governance of a state. The model was first developed in ancient Greece and came into widespread use by the Roman Republic as part of the unmodified Constitution of the Roman Republic. Under this model, the state is divided into branches, each with separate and independent powers and areas of responsibility so that no one branch has more power than the other branches. The normal division of branches is into an executive, a legislature, and a judiciary. For similar reasons, the concept of Separation of church and state has been adopted in a number of countries, to varying degrees depending on the applicable legal structures and prevalent views toward the proper role of religion in society.[citation needed] Contents [hide] 1 Montesquieu's tripartite system 2 Comparison with fusion of powers 3 Various models 3.1 Australia: three branches 3.2 Costa Rica: three branches 3.3 European Union 3.4 France 3.5 Germany: three branches and six bodies 3.6 Hong Kong 3.7 Hungary: four branches and six bodies 3.8 India: three branches 3.9 Republic of China: five branches 3.10 United Kingdom: three branches 3.11 United States: three branches 3.11.1 Checks and balances 4 See also 5 References 6 External links [edit]Montesquieu's tripartite system ‹ The template below (Cleanup) is being considered for deletion. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus.›

This section may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Please improve this section if you can. The talk page may contain suggestions. (October 2008) The term is ascribed to French Enlightenment political philosopher Baron de Montesquieu.[1][2] Montesquieu described division of political power among an executive, a legislature, and a judiciary. He based this model on the British constitutional system, in which he perceived a separation of powers among the monarch, Parliament, and the courts of law. Subsequent writers have noted that this was misleading[citation needed], because the United Kingdom had a very closely connected legislature and executive, with further links to the judiciary (though combined with judicial independence). Montesquieu did specify that "the independence of the judiciary has to be real, and not apparent merely". "The judiciary was generally seen as the most important of powers, independent and unchecked", and also considered the least dangerous. [edit]Comparison with fusion of powers

This section does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (December 2008) In democratic systems of governance, a continuum exists between "government" and "Parliamentary government". "Separation of powers" is a feature more inherent to presidential systems, whereas "fusion of powers" is characteristic of parliamentary ones. "Mixed systems" fall somewhere in between, usually near the midpoint; the most notable example of a mixed system is France's (current) Fifth Republic. In fusion of powers, one government (invariably the elected legislature) is supreme, and the other estates are subservient to it. In separation of powers, each estate is largely (although not necessarily entirely) independent of the others. Independent in this context means either that selection of each estate happens independently of the other estates or at least that each estate is not beholden to any of the others for its continued existence. Accordingly, in a fusion of powers system such as that of the United Kingdom, first described as such by Walter Bagehot, the people elect the legislature, which in turn "creates" the executive. As Professor Cheryl Saunders writes, "...the intermixture of institutions [in the UK] is such that it is almost impossible to describe it as a separation of powers."[3] In a separation of powers, the national legislature does not select the person or persons[4] of the executive; instead, the executive is chosen by other means (direct popular election, electoral college selection, etc.) In a parliamentary system, when the term of the legislature ends, so too may the tenure of the executive selected by that legislature. Although in a presidential system the executive's term may or may not coincide with the legislature's, their selection is technically independent of the legislature. However, when the executive's party controls the legislature, the executive often reaps the benefits of what is, in effect, a "fusion of powers". Such situations may thwart the constitutional goal or normal popular perception that the legislature is the more democratic branch or the one "closer to the people", reducing it to a virtual "consultative assembly", politically or procedurally unable—or unwilling—to hold the executive accountable in the event of blatant, even boldly admitted, "high crimes and misdemeanors." The separation of powers is a doctrine which provides a separate authority, which makes it possible for the authorities to check each others checks and balances (Executive Authority Act 1936). [edit]Various models

Constitutions with a high degree of separation of powers are found worldwide. The UK system is distinguished by a particular entwining of powers. In Italy the powers are completely separated, even if Council of Ministers need the vote of confidence from both chambers of Parliament, that's however formed by a wide number of members (almost 1,000). A number of Latin American countries have electoral branches of government. Countries with little separation of power include New Zealand and Canada. Canada makes limited use of separation of powers in practice, although in theory it distinguishes between branches of government. Complete separation-of-powers systems are almost always presidential, although theoretically this need not be the case. There are a few historical exceptions, such as the Directoire system of revolutionary France. Switzerland offers an example of non-Presidential separation of powers today: It is run by a seven-member executive branch, the Federal Council. However, some might argue that Switzerland does not have a strong separation of powers system, as the Federal Council is appointed by parliament (but not dependent on parliament), and the judiciary has no power of review. [edit]Australia: three branches Main article: Separation of powers in Australia Australia does not maintain a strict separation between the legislative and executive branches of government—indeed, government ministers are required to be a member of parliament—but the federal judiciary strictly guards its independence from the other two branches. However, under influence from the American constitution, the Australian constitution does define the three branches of government separately, and this has been interpreted by the judiciary to induce an implicit separation of powers. State governments have a similar level of separation of power, but this is generally on the basis of convention, rather than constitution. [edit]Costa Rica: three branches As the aftermath of the 44-day civil war in 1948 (after former President and incumbent candidate Rafael Álgel Calderón Guardia tried to take power through fraud, by not recognising the results of the presidential election that he had lost), the question of which transformational model the Costa Rican State would follow was the main issue that confronted the victors. A Constituent Assembly was elected by popular vote to draw up a new constitution, enacted in 1949 and still in force. This document was an edit of the constitution of 1871, as the constituent assembly rejected more radical corporatist ideas proposed by the ruling Junta Fundadora de la Segunda República (which, although having come to power by military force, abolished the armed forces). Nonetheless, the new constitution increased centralization of power at the expense of municipalities and eliminated provincial government altogether, at the time it increased the powers of congress and the judiciary. It established the three supreme powers as the legislature, executive, and judicial branches, but also created two other autonomous state organs that have equivalent power but not equivalent rank. The first is the Supreme Elections Tribunal (electoral branch) which controls elections and makes unique, unappealable decisions on their outcomes. The second is the office of the Comptroller General (audit branch), an autonomous and independent organ nominally subordinate to the unicameral legislative assembly. All budgets of ministries and municipalities must pass through this agency, including the execution of budget items such as contracting for routine operations. The Comptroller also provides financial vigilance over government offices and office holders, and routinely brings actions to remove mayors for malfeasance, firmly establishing this organization as the fifth branch of the Republic. [edit]European Union First, note that the European Union is a supranational polity, and is neither a country nor a federation; but as the EU wields political power, and is fully aware of its "democratic deficit", it attempts to comply with the principle of separation of powers. There are five institutions of the European Union. In intergovernmental matters, most power is concentrated in the Council of the European Union - giving it the characteristics of a normal international organization. Here, all power at EU level is in one branch. In the latter there are four main actors. The European Commission acts as an independent executive which is appointed by the Council in conjunction with the European Parliament; but the Commission also has a legislative role as the sole initiator of EU legislation. An early maxim was: "The Commission proposes and the Council disposes"; and although the EU's lawmaking procedure is now much more complicated, this simple maxim still holds some truth. As well as both executive and legislative functions, the Commission arguably exercises a third, quasi-judicial, function under Articles 81 & 82 (competition law ); although the ECJ remains the final arbiter. The European Parliament is one half of the legislative branch and is directly elected. The Council itself acts both as the second half of the legislative branch and also holds some executive functions (some of which are exercised by the related European Council in practice). The European Court of Justice acts as the independent judicial branch, interpreting EU law and treaties. The remaining institution, the European Court of Auditors, is an independent audit authority (due to the sensitive nature of fraud in the EU). Council of the European Union - legislative and executive European Commission - executive, legislative and quasi-judicial European Council - executive European Court of Auditors - audit European Court of Justice - judicial European Parliament - legislative [edit]France Main article: Government of France This section requires expansion. [edit]Germany: three branches and six bodies The six main bodies enshrined in the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany are: Federal President (Bundespräsident) - executive Federal Cabinet (Bundesregierung) - executive Federal Diet (Bundestag) & Federal Council (Bundesrat) - legislative Federal Assembly (Bundesversammlung) - presidential electoral college Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) - judiciary The Bundesversammlung is primarily constituted of members of the Bundestag and in the same count by the Parliaments of the States (mostly called "Landtag") elected Electors. Besides the constitutional court the judicial branch at the federal level is made up of five supreme courts — one for civil and criminal cases (Bundesgerichtshof), and one each for administrative, tax, labour, and social security issues. There are also state (Länder / Bundesländer) based courts beneath them, and a rarely used senate of the supreme courts. [edit]Hong Kong Hong Kong has three branches, i.e. the Government, the Legislative Council, and the Judiciary. The Chief Executive is both head of the region and head of government. The law courts emphasis the separation of powers in their rulings, yet politically separation of powers is usually argued against, with the People's Republic of China, the sovereign power over Hong Kong, and pro-Beijing politicians emphasizing an "executive-led" system. [edit]Hungary: four branches and six bodies The four independent branches of power in Hungary are: the parliament (legislative), the government (executive), the court system (judiciary) and the office of the public accuser (i.e. attorney general). Parliament (Magyar Országgyűlés): elected every 4 years by the people in a highly complex, two-round voting system Government (Magyar Kormány): installed and removed by 50%+1 basic majority vote of the parliament, 4 year terms Supreme Court (Legfelsőbb Bíróság): Chief justice elected by qualified (2/3rd) majority of the parliament, no government oversight Constitutional court (Alkotmánybíróság): members elected by qualified majority of the parliament for 8 years, this body nullifies laws and has no government oversight. Chief public accuser (Legfőbb ügyész): elected by qualified majority of the parliament, 6 year terms, office budget fixed, no government oversight. The President of the Republic (Köztársasági Elnök) is elected by qualified majority of the Hungarian parliament for 5 year terms (cannot be reelected more than once). He/she has ceremonial powers only, signs laws into power and commands the military in time of peace. The independent pillar status of the Hungarian public accuser's office is a unique construction, loosely modeled on the system Portugal introduced after the 1974 victory of the Carnation Revolution. The public accuser (attorney general) body has became the fourth column of Hungarian democracy only in recent times: after communism fell in 1989, the office was made independent by a new clausule XI. of the Constitution. The change was meant to prevent abuse of state power, especially with regards to the use of false accusations against opposition politicians, who may be excluded from elections if locked in protracted or excessively severe court cases. To prevent the Hungarian accuser's office from neglecting its duties, natural human private persons can submit investigation requests, called "pótmagánvád" directly to the courts, if the accusers' office refuses to do its job. Courts will decide if the allegations have merit and order police to act in lieu of the accuser's office if warranted. In its decision No.42/2005 the Hungarian constitutional court declared that the government does not enjoy such privilege and the state is powerless to further pursue cases if the public accuser refuses to do so. [edit]India: three branches Main articles: Constitution of India and Government of India Parliament = Legislative Prime Minister = Executive Supreme Court = Judicial This section requires expansion. The democratic system in India also offers a clear separation of powers. India follows a parliamentary system of government. The Judiciary branch is fairly independent of the other two branches. Executive powers are vested with the President who is assisted by the Council of Ministers. All three branches have "checks and balances" over each other to maintain the balance of power.Executive branch is under the President, Vice-President and Cabinet Secretary. [edit]Republic of China: five branches Main article: Government of the Republic of China According to Sun Yat-sen's idea of "separation of the five powers", the government of the Republic of China has five branches: Executive Yuan - led by the premier but in actuality it is the president who sets policy Legislative Yuan - unicameral Judicial Yuan - its Constitutional Court (highest) and Supreme Court have different jurisdictions Control Yuan - audit branch Examination Yuan - civil service personnel management and human resources The president and vice president as well as the defunct National Assembly are constitutionally not part of the above five branches. Before being abolished in 2005, the National Assembly was a constitutional convention and electoral college for the president and vice president. Its constitutional amending powers were passed to the legislative yuan and its electoral powers were passed to the electorate. The relationship between the executive and legislative branches are poorly defined. An example of the problems this causes is the near complete political paralysis that results when the president, who has neither the power to veto nor the ability to dissolve the legislature and call new elections, cannot negotiate with the legislature when his party is in the minority.[5] The examination and control yuans are marginal branches; their leaders as well as the leaders of the executive and judicial yuans are appointed by the president and confirmed by the legislative yuan. The legislature is the only branch that chooses its own leadership. The vice president has practically no responsibilities. [edit]United Kingdom: three branches Parliament = Legislative Prime Minister, Cabinet, Government Departments & Civil Service = Executive Courts = Judiciary Although the doctrine of separation of power plays a role in the United Kingdom's constitutional doctrine, the UK constitution is often described as having "a weak separation of powers" A. V. Dicey, despite its constitution being the one to which Montesquieu originally referred. For example, in the United Kingdom, the executive forms a subset of the legislature, as did—to a lesser extent—the judiciary until the establishment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. The Prime Minister, the Chief Executive, sits as a member of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, either as a peer in the House of Lords or as an elected member of the House of Commons (by convention, and as a result of the supremacy of the Lower House, the Prime Minister now sits in the House of Commons) and can effectively be removed from office by a simple majority vote. Furthermore, while the courts in the United Kingdom are undoubtedly amongst the most independent in the world, the Law Lords, who were the final arbiters of judicial disputes in the UK, until recently sat simultaneously in the House of Lords, the upper house of the legislature, although this arrangement ceased in 2009 when the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom came into existence. Furthermore, because of the existence of Parliamentary sovereignty, while the theory of separation of powers may be studied there, a system such as that of the UK is more accurately described as a "fusion of powers".[citation needed] The development of the British constitution, which is not a codified document, is based on this fusion in the person of the Monarch, who has a formal role to play in the legislature (Parliament, which is where legal and political sovereignty lies, is the Crown-in-Parliament, and is summoned and dissolved by the Sovereign who must give his or her Royal Assent to all Bills so that they become Acts), the executive (the Sovereign appoints all ministers of His/Her Majesty's Government, who govern in the name of the Crown) and the judiciary (the Sovereign, as the fount of justice, appoints all senior judges, and all public prosecutions are brought in his or her name). The British legal systems are based on common law traditions which require: Police or regulators cannot initiate complaints under criminal law but can only investigate (prosecution is mostly reserved for the Crown Prosecution Service), which prevents selective enforcement, e.g. the 'fishing expedition' which is often specifically forbidden. Prosecutors cannot withhold evidence from attorneys for the defendant; to do so results in mistrial or dismissal. Accordingly, their relation to police is no advantage. Defendants convicted can appeal, but only fresh and compelling evidence not available at trial can be introduced, restricting the power of the court of appeal to the process of law applied. [edit]United States: three branches Main article: Separation of powers under the United States Constitution In the United States Constitution, Article 1 Section I gives Congress only those "legislative powers herein granted" and proceeds to list those permissible actions in Article I Section 8, while Section 9 lists actions that are prohibited for Congress. The vesting clause in Article II places no limits on the Executive branch, simply stating that, "The Executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America."[6] The Supreme Court holds "The judicial Power" according to Article III, and it established the implication of Judicial review in Marbury vs Madison.[7] The federal government refers to the branches as "branches of government", while some systems use "government" to describe the executive. The Executive branch has attempted to claim power arguing for separation of powers to include being the Commander in Chief of a standing army since the Civil war, executive orders, emergency powers and security classifications since WWII, national security, signing statements, and the scope of the unitary executive. [edit]Checks and balances To prevent one branch from becoming supreme, protect the "opulent minority" from the majority,and to induce the branches to cooperate, governance systems that employ a separation of powers need a way to balance each of the branches. Typically this was accomplished through a system of "checks and balances", the origin of which, like separation of powers itself, is specifically credited to Montesquieu. Checks and balances allow for a system based regulation that allows one branch to limit another, such as the power of Congress to alter the composition and jurisdiction of the federal courts Legislative (Congress) Executive (President) Judicial (Supreme Court) Passes bills; has broad taxing and spending power; controls the federal budget; has power to borrow money on the credit of the United States (may be vetoed by President, but vetoes may be overridden with a two-thirds vote of both houses) Has sole power to declare war. Oversees, investigates, and makes the rules for the government and its officers. Defines by law the jurisdiction of the federal judiciary in cases not specified by the Constitution Ratification of treaties signed by the President and gives advice and consent to presidential appointments to the federal judiciary, federal executive departments, and other posts (Senate only) Has sole power of impeachment (House of Representatives) and trial of impeachments (Senate); can remove federal executive and judicial officers from office for high crimes and misdemeanors Has all the Executive Power Is the commander-in-chief of the armed forces Preserves, protects and defends the Constitution. Faithfully executes the laws of the Country. Executes the instructions of Congress. May veto bills passed by Congress (but the veto may be overridden by a two-thirds majority of both houses Executes the spending authorized by Congress. Executes the instructions of Congress when it declares war or makes rules for the military. Declares states of emergency and publishes regulations and executive orders. Makes executive agreements (does not require ratification) and signs treaties (ratification requiring by two-thirds of the Senate) Makes appointments to the federal judiciary, federal executive departments, and other posts with the advice and consent of the Senate. Has power to make temporary appointment during the recess of the Senate Has the power to Grant "Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment." Determines which laws Congress intended to apply to any given case Exercises judicial review, reviewing the constitutionality of laws Determines how Congress meant the law to apply to disputes Determines how a law acts to determine the disposition of prisoners Determines how a law acts to compel testimony and the production of evidence Determines how laws should be interpreted to assure uniform policies in a top-down fashion via the appeals process, but gives discretion in individual cases to low-level judges. (The amount of discretion depends upon the standard of review, determined by the type of case in question.) Federal judges serve for life [edit]See also

Absolute power Balance of power (federalism) Power sharing Constitution of the Roman Republic Constitutionalism Constitutional economics Corruption Perceptions Index - Parliamentary systems are, in general, perceived as less corrupt than other systems Fifth power Fusion of powers Independence of the judiciary Judicial activism Legal reform Mixed government List of democracy and elections-related topics Pith and substance Rule of Law Rule According to Higher Law Signing statement Unitary executive theory [edit]References

This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate. (July 2009) ^ "Baron de Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)". Plato.stanford.edu. Retrieved 2008-10-29. ^ "lawiki.org law — Separation of Powers: the reality". lawiki.org. Retrieved 2010-09-16. ^ Cheryl Saunders. "Separation of Powers and the Judicial Branch" (doc). ^ Two examples of executives of more than one person are a triumvirate (three rulers) and a constitutional monarchy (two rulers). ^ "E-Notes: Why Taiwan's Political Paralysis Persists — FPRI". Fpri.org. Retrieved 2008-10-29. ^ Constitution of the United States ^ Madison, James. (8 February 1788) "The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments" The Federalist Papers No. 51 Peter Barenboim, Biblical Roots of Separation of Powers (2005) ISBN 5-94381-123-0, Permalink: http://lccn.loc.gov/2006400578 Biancamaria Fontana (ed.), The Invention of the Modern Republic (2007) ISBN-13: 9780521033763 Bernard Manin, Principles of Representative Government (English version 1997) Adam Przeworski and José María Maravall (eds), Democracy and the Rule of Law (2003) ISBN 0-521-53266-3 Iain Stewart, "Men of Class: Aristotle, Montesquieu and Dicey on 'Separation of Powers' and 'The Rule of Law'" (2004) Alec Stone Sweet, Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe (2000) ISBN 978-0-19-829730-7 M. J. C. Vile, Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers (1967, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1998) Second edition. [edit]External links

Montesquieu, "Notes on England" Polybius and the Founding Fathers: the separation of powers Arbitrary Government Described and the Government of the Massachusetts Vindicated from that Aspersion (1644) Categories: Philosophy of law | Separation of powers | Political science terms article discussion edit this page history watch Apu1010 my talk my preferences my watchlist my contributions log out navigation Main page Contents Featured content Current events Random article Donate to Wikipedia search

interaction Help About Wikipedia Community portal Recent changes Contact Wikipedia toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Cite this page print/export Create a book Download as PDF Printable version languages Acèh Afrikaans العربية Aragonés Asturianu Bân-lâm-gú Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца) Български Català Česky Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto فارسی Français 한국어 Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano עברית Basa Jawa Kiswahili Latina Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Македонски Bahasa Melayu Nederlands 日本語 Norsk (bokmål) Norsk (nynorsk) Plattdüütsch Polski Português Română Runa Simi Русский Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Srpskohrvatski / Српскохрватски Suomi Svenska தமிழ் ไทย Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt Winaray ייִדיש 中文

This page was last modified on 5 January 2011 at 13:54. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. See Terms of Use for details. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Contact us Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers

inline citations

sentence one: http://www.peo.gov.au/students/fss/fss35.html Apu1010 (talk) 14:19, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Sentence two: http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2698.htm Apu1010 (talk) 13:53, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

sentence Three http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/publications.nsf/0/E88B2C638DC23E51CA256EDE00795896 Apu1010 (talk) 14:20, 1 March 2011 (UTC)