User:Sumit.iitp/Statement issues/notes
Putting down notes regarding the study:
Response to the thread on WP:Featured_article_review#East_End_of_London
- Hi, thanks for your notes User:Nikkimaria, User:Iridescent, and User:Buidhe. Our evaluations have shown promising results in identifying minor issues of point-of-view and missing citations. However, for practical use, we still need to answer questions like: "How many statements to flag?, How to tailor it for Featured Article Review?". To achieve the last mile of testing needed to make this useful for article review, we request feedback from the community on the study. I have updated the research page with our automated results to give a sense of its effectiveness. We welcome alternate inputs from the members to make it better! Sumit (talk) 23:29, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
- Looks like the links didn't take. Pinging User:Nikkimaria, User:Iridescent, and User:Buidhe to make sure they see this. --EpochFail (talk • contribs) 12:50, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Postings[edit]
- Response: 0
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:1996_Football_League_First_Division_play-off_Final#Statement_Quality_Predictions (TRM's page)
- Response: 0
- Response: 0
- Response: 0
- Response: 1
- Response: 0
- Response: 0
Wikiproject postings[edit]
Considering C-class articles on following Wikiprojects:
I am trying to find a way to pick the most active articles on these projects. In the default case, I will pick the most recent articles present on the discussion pages.