User:TRCloyd/User:Buzzybuzz12/Culture of Brazil/TRCloyd Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

• Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) User:Buzzybuzz12

• Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Buzzybuzz12/Culture of Brazil

Lead

Guiding questions:

• Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? It's not a full sentence, but it does the job.
• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? It does not
• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is concise

Content

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added relevant to the topic? Relatively, there seems to be emphasis on the clothing and not so much mannerisms
• Is the content added up-to-date? The articles are relatively up to date
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I would not say much; there could be more info on mannerisms in regards to etiquette

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added neutral? There is full neutrality
• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? there is no bias in the paragraph
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No viewpoints are present to be presented
• Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? The sources are fine
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? The sources are thorough
• Are the sources current? The sources are not outdated
• Check a few links. Do they work? The links work fine

Organization

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? There are no problems with figuring out the reading
• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Nothing noticeable at a first glance
• Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? The organization is good

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No images were added
• Are images well-captioned? No images were added
• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? No images were added
• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? No images were added

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

• Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
• How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
• Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
• Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

• Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? The article has more meaning to it now
• What are the strengths of the content added? It does go over more things and does give more insight into the topic of the culture
• How can the content added be improved? The addition is over the etiquette in regards to the culture but mostly goes over apparel in regards to etiquette when there can be more things regarding etiquette