User:ThayerM12/Rough Draft
Tactile discrimination is the ability to differentiate information received through the sense of touch. This is often tested during neurological examination and represents a higher level of neurological function involving the cerebral cortex. Examples include the ability to discriminate between sharp and dull objects touching the skin, stereognosis, graphesthesia, and two-point discrimination.
Pathways
[edit]Somatosensory System
[edit]Includes multiple types of sensations from the body. This includes light, touch, pain, pressure, temperature, and join/muscle sense. Each of these are categorized in 3 different areas. Those are discriminative touch, pain and pressure, and proprioception. Discriminative touch includes touch, pressure, being able to recognize vibrations, etc. Pain and temperature includes the perception of pain/ amounts of pain and the severity of temperatures as wells as itching and tickling. And finally proprioception that includes receptors for everything that occurs below the surface including those on various muscles, joints, and tendons. Each of these 3 categories have their own types of pathways and receptors. These pathways target the cerebellum in the brain. This section of the brain tracks what the muscles are doing at all times so any potential damage to this area can greatly affect one’s senses.
Within each Somatosensory pathway, there 3 types of neurons, including the pseudounipolar neuron, secondary afferent neurons, and tertiary afferent neurons. There are also slowly adapting receptors that signify those receptors that sense the indents made on the skin. There are also rapidly adapting receptors. An example of a slow adapting receptor in use is when a person breaks his/her arm, the arm is immobilized until it is healed. He/she does not want to forget that it is broken and do something that could potentially further damage the arm. An example of a rapid adapting receptor in use is putting on clothes. Initially, you will feel the clothes being worn, but after a while, you forget that clothes are being worn. It is not at the forefront of the brain to focus on the feeling of the clothes on your body. However, if you were to concentrate on that feeling, you can instantly feel the contact between your skin and the clothing being worn.
Discriminative Touch System
[edit]Deals with everything from the toes to the neck through the spinal cord. The sensation experienced enters the periphery, the edges, by axons. More specifically, the sensory axons. This signal passes through axon to axon from the distal to proximal process. Distal means “away from the center” while proximal signifies nearer to the center. The proximal end of the specific axon leads into the spinal cord on the dorsal half. This then moves towards the brain. These axons that are leading the signal towards the spinal cord to the brain are classified as primary afferents. This makes sense as afferent is defined conducting toward something. These neurons are sending signals towards the brain. Those that receive the neuron synapses are classified as secondary afferents. These neurons go to the thalamus and then synapsed towards another set of neurons that move towards the cerebral cortex.
Types of Receptors
[edit]Peripheral Mechanoreceptors - Activation of these receptors is the initial step of recognizing a stimulation. A indentation, as stated before, becomes an electrical signal in the peripheral process of a primary afferent neuron. This creates a depolarization across the membrane of the neuron and this leads to an action potential that goes to the cerebellum of the brain to create some sort of action whether that is to move away quickly, grab something, etc.
Cutaneous Tactile receptors, Deep tactile mechanoreceptors (dermis of skin) , proprioceptive receptors. Etc.
Special Types
[edit]Stereognosis
[edit]Stereognosis(Tactile Gnosis) is defined as the ability to tell the difference and identify objects via touch in the absence of visual or auditory contact. The subject will need to be able to recognize temperature, spatial properties, texture, and size to achieve reach an accurate conclusion to what the object is [1]. This test will give an indication of the status of the Parietal lobe of the Brain [2]. When conducting this test, common objects that the subject is familiar with are used in order to ensure and accurate reading and consistency amongst multiple test with multiple different subjects. By utilizing this test, practitioners will be able to detect and track the presence or effects of Neurodegenerative Diseases such as Alzheimer's disease due to Astereognosis which is the failure to recognize objects via touch without visual recognition [3].
Graphesthesia
[edit]Graphesthesia is the ability in which a person is able to recognize a number or letter that is written on the skin [4]. Like other tactile discrimination tests, it is a measurement of the patient's sense of touch and requires that the patient perform the test voluntarily and without visual contact. The purpose of this test is to detect any defects in the Central nervous system such as lesions in the systems that comprise of the Brainstem, Spinal cord, Thalamus, or Sensory cortex. In order for this test to be carried out successfully, it is imperative that the subject's primary sensations be fully functional. A severe lesion in the CNS would suggest a loss in primary sensation. It is also important that the practitioner and the patient communicate ahead of time about the orientation of the characters, as well as where on the body the figures are to be drawn (usually on the palms) [4]. In order to make the test more flexible, the patient may select the correct answer from a series of images in lieu of communicating verbally if the patient suffers from a speech or language impairment. The Graphesthesia test is also more versatile than the Stereognosis test since it doesn't require since it doesn't require for the patient to be able to grasp an object [5].
Two-point discrimination
[edit]Two-point discrimination (2PD) is a neurological examination in which two sharp points are applied to the surface of a part of the body in order to see if the patient recognizes them as two discrete sensations [6]. By conducting this test it is believed that practitioners will be able to discern the relative amount of nerves in the tested location. When conducting the test on the desired part of the body, the practitioner may apply both points simultaneously or with just one point. The pracitioner may switch between the two at random. In order for the examination to be be conducted in the most proper fashion, it is imperative that there be clear and open communication between the subject and the practitioner with the subject being fully conscious and not under any sort of influence while at the same time not making visual contact with the device [7]. The two-point threshold is the smallest distance between the two points[8]. The efficacy of Two-point discrimination has come under scrutiny from many researchers despite being commonly used to this day in a clinical setting. Research studies have shown that the 2PD test does a poor job of determining the degree of which the nerves regain their function after damage, as well as determining the sensory failures in the first place, owing to the test's simplicity, crudeness, and dependence of anecdotal evidence. The research studies have also shown that there is a discrepancy between the data obtained from 2PD tests and data obtained from other tests used to measure tactile spatial acuity [9]. As a result, other methods such as Grating Orientation task (GOT) and two-point orientation discrimination (2POD) have been used as more effective alternatives[10][11].
Spatial Discrimination
[edit]Spatial Discrimination is another form of Two-point discrimination in which the practitioner tests for innervation of the skin with two blunt points of a compass. Just with like 2PD, the patient must be able to discriminate between the two applied points [12]. All other parameters, methods, and objectives of the Spatial Discrimination test and the 2PD test remain the same.
Frequency Discrimination
[edit]Frequency Discrimination is an auditory test in which the subject must be able to discriminate between two auditory stimuli that are at different frequencies with the sound level being the Negative control. The frequencies are measured from a range of 0.25-8kHz [13].
Applications
[edit]Blindness
[edit]When a person has become blind, in order to “see” the world their other senses become heightened. An important sense for the blind is their sense of touch, which becomes more frequently used to help them perceive the world. People that are blind have displayed that their visual cortices become more responsive to auditory and tactile stimulation. Braille allows the blind to be able to use their sense of touch to feel the roughness, and distance of various patterns to be used as a form of language. Within the brain, the activation of the occipital cortex is functionally relevant for tactile braille reading, as well as the somatosensory cortex. [14]These different parts of the brain function in their own way, they each contribute to the effectiveness of how braille is read by the blind. People that are blind rely heavily on their Tactile Gnosis, Spatial discrimination, Graphesthesia, and Two-point discrimination. Essentially, the occipital cortex allows one to effectively make judgements on the distance of the various braille patterns, which is described as spatial discrimination. [15]Meanwhile, the somatosensory cortex allows one to effectively make judgements on the roughness of various braille patterns, which is described as two-point discrimination. [15] In regard to blindness, these various visual areas in the brain are very essential for a blind person to read braille, just as much as a person that has sight. The visual cortices of blind individuals are active during various vision related tasks including tactile discrimination and the function of the cortices resemble the activity of adults with sight. [16] Essentially, whether one is blind or not, the perception of objects that involves tactile discrimination is not impaired if one cannot see. When comparing people that are blind to people that have sight, the amount of activity within the their somatosensory and visual areas of the brain differ. For example, in people that are blind, the activity within the somatosensory and visual areas are highly active in regard to tactile gnosis.[17] The difference for people that are not blind show that the activity in the somatosensory and visual areas are not as high for that type of tactile discrimination, and are more-so active for more visual related stimuli that does not involve touch. Nonetheless, there is a difference in these various areas within the brain when comparing the blind to the sighted, which is that shape discrimination causes a difference in brain activity.
Chronic Pain
[edit]Some non-neuropathic chronic pain conditions such as arthritis have been shown to decrease tactile acuity, the ability to precisely detect touch [18]. There is a difference between chronic pain conditions and how they affect the tactile acuity deficits. One of the conditions with the most profound deficits in tactile acuity is arthritis because this condition affects the tactile acuity both at the site of the pain and at remote locations away from the pain [18]. This suggests that the deficit may be a result of a cortical reorganization, or cortical remapping in the patient’s brain. Other conditions like chronic regional pain syndrome show deficits only at the site of pain, and still other conditions like burning mouth syndrome shows no deficit in tactile acuity [18]. Although there is evidence that some chronic pain conditions cause a decrease in tactile acuity there is no evidence to suggest when this deficit becomes clinically meaningful and affects the function of the patient [18].
Robotic Tactile Discrimination
[edit]As robots and prosthetic limbs become more complex the need for sensors capable of detecting touch with high tactile acuity becomes more and more necessary. There are many types of tactile sensors used for different tasks [19]. There are three types of tactile sensors the first being single point sensors which can be compared to a single cell, or whiskers. The second type of sensor is a high spatial resolution sensor which can be compared to a human fingertip and is essential for the tactile acuity in robotic hands. The third and final tactile sensor type is a low spatial resolution sensor which has similar tactile acuity as the skin on one’s back or arm [19]. These sensors can be placed meaningfully throughout the surface of a prosthetic or a robot to give it the ability to sense touch in similar, if not better, ways than the human counterpart.
- ^ Yekutiel, M., Jariwala, M., & Stretch, P. (1994). Sensory deficit in the hands of children with cerebral palsy: a new look at assessment and prevalence. Dev Med Child Neurol, 36:61-24.
- ^ Silvestri: Saunders Comprehensive Review for the NCLEX-RN Exam
- ^ Huff, F. J.; Becker, J. T.; Belle, S. H.; Nebes, R. D.; Holland, A. L.; Boller, F. (1987-07-01). "Cognitive deficits and clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease". Neurology. 37 (7): 1119–1119. doi:10.1212/wnl.37.7.1119. ISSN 0028-3878. PMID 3601078.
- ^ a b Blumenfeld, H. (2010). 'Neuroanatomy Through Clinical Cases' (2nd Edition ed.). Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates Inc. http://www.neuroexam.com/neuroexam/content41.html.
- ^ O'Sullivan, S. B., & Schmitz, T. J. (2007). 'Physical Rehabilitation' (5th Edition ed.). Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company.
- ^ two-point discrimination. (n.d.) McGraw-Hill Concise Dictionary of Modern Medicine. (2002). Retrieved March 16 2018 from https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/two-point+discrimination
- ^ Hal., Blumenfeld, (2010). Neuroanatomy through clinical cases (2nd ed ed.). Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates. ISBN 9780878930586. OCLC 473478856.
{{cite book}}
:|edition=
has extra text (help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Physical rehabilitation. O'Sullivan, Susan B., Schmitz, Thomas J. (5th ed ed.). Philadelphia: F.A. Davis. 2007. ISBN 9780803612471. OCLC 70119705.
{{cite book}}
:|edition=
has extra text (help)CS1 maint: others (link) - ^ Van Boven, R. W.; Johnson, K. O. (February 1994). "A psychophysical study of the mechanisms of sensory recovery following nerve injury in humans". Brain: A Journal of Neurology. 117 ( Pt 1): 149–167. ISSN 0006-8950. PMID 8149208.
- ^ Tong, Jonathan; Mao, Oliver; Goldreich, Daniel (2013). "Two-Point Orientation Discrimination Versus the Traditional Two-Point Test for Tactile Spatial Acuity Assessment". Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 7. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00579. ISSN 1662-5161.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - ^ Johnson, K. O.; Phillips, J. R. (December 1981). "Tactile spatial resolution. I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition". Journal of Neurophysiology. 46 (6): 1177–1192. doi:10.1152/jn.1981.46.6.1177. ISSN 0022-3077. PMID 7320742.
- ^ spatial discrimination. (n.d.) Medical Dictionary. (2009). Retrieved March 17 2018 from https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/spatial+discrimination.
- ^ Lorenzi, Antoine; Chaix, Benjamin. (2016). “Journey into the world of hearing”. Retrieved March 17 2018 from http://www.cochlea.eu/en/sound/psychoacoustics/pitch.
- ^ Lotfi, Merabet; Gregor, Thut; Brian, Murray; Jessica, Andrews; Steven, Hsiao; Alvaro, Pascual-Leone (2--4). "Feeling by Sight or Seeing by Touch" (PDF).
{{cite journal}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help); Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - ^ a b Cite error: The named reference
”Touch”
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Marina, Bedny (2017). "Evidence from Blindness for a Cognitively Pluripotent Cortex" (PDF).
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - ^ Ane, Gurtubay-Antolin; Antoni, Rodriguez-Fornells (2017). "Neurophysiological Evidence for Enhanced Tactile Acuity in Early Blindness in Some but not all Haptic Tasks" (PDF).
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - ^ a b c d Catley MJ; O'connell NE; Berryman C; Ayhan FF; Moseley GL (October 2014). "Is tactile acuity altered in people with chronic pain? a systematic review and meta-analysis". Journal of Pain.
- ^ a b S. Luo; J. Bimbo; R. Dahiya; H. Liu (December 2017). "Robotic tactile perception of object properties: A review". Mechatronics. 48: 54-67.