User:Tommstein/List of Personal Attacks, Civility Breaches, Good Faith Violations, etc. by Jehovah's Witnesses

User: Duffer1

"Hypocrite... your obsessive need to slander and lie... your motives for such behavior, highly questionable... you are being deceptive"

"The only thing you demonstrate here is your profound lack of knowledge"

"in awe of your hypocracy [sic]... Your demonstrable lack of compassion and objectivity is only surpassed by your hypocracy [sic]... The attitude you take against truth and objectivity"

Edit summary: "biased tripe"

Edit summary: "POV tripe"

"you have perpetuated a tradition of one sided criticism... this crap should be deleted"

Edit summary: "Elias don't misrepresent"

"this trash"

"your misunderstanding is not mine"

"one anonymous critic ignorantly claimed"

"if you were at all concerned about NPOV you would have no objections to my change"

Edit summary: "removed the BS..."

Edit summary: "You're a real piece of work Tomm"

"You are not being reasonable or objective"

"What's the matter with you?"

Edit summary: "Stop being unreasonable and misleading"

"an unreasonable person... your unreasonableness"

Edit summary: "your persistence in the unintelligible has exceeded absurdity"

Edit summary: "get off yourself Tomm"

"I hope you, Tomm, can come to some form of civility and reasonableness"

"You are unbelievable man"

Edit summary: "that nonsense from Tomm"

"if you want to alleviate your confusion on this matter... inept, prejudiced, and highly POV"

"remains entirely ignorant"

"Sean Hannity would be proud of you"

"Your confusion... If you had an ounce of interest in finding the truth... drop the bullshit... man-up... your lie... your ignorance and prejudice"

"you have absolutely no respect for truth or accuracy... you're stubborn"

Edit summary: "get off it Tomm"

"you can get that point of view informed with actual facts"

"you read it as prejudicially as possible... your ignorance... Your problem(s) is presumption (and prejudice.. bias.. stubbornness.. ignorance..)... setting straight of your ignorance... you so decietfully state... another setting straight of your ignorance... I'll explain it for you just incase... such as yourself, but to an informed person... abuse it as you do"

"Are you a mind reader?"

"people who have continuously demonstrated zero regard for truth and accuracy (you and sometimes Central)"

Edit summary: "POV crap"

"do you not understand connotation and context?"

"you need a permanent mediator Tomm"

"So this is where the backbiting takes place"

"If you would like to persist in ignorance... the proliferation of your misconceptions"

"misread out of our literature"

"misread out of our publications"

"draw misguided conclusions"

"responding to Central's prejudice"

"lets talk about your bias"

"Tomm has used quotes both out of context of the original source it was found in, but also, has used in context quotes to distort... Your misunderstanding... lets fill an encyclopedia with our misconceptions and rhetoric"

"the pervasive prejudice of both him and Central"

"it was your prejudice that started this... your snide remarks"

"what non-Jehovah's Witnesses missunderstand from the same publication"

"you spammed on the JW talk page... You also misrepresent"

"They are attempting the libel of an entire Bible translation"

"your abuse of accuracy and NPOV"

"lack of willingness to compromise... misrepresentation, misinterpretation, and rhetoric... again, Tomm misrepresents... lie about our beliefs or misrepresent the teachings of Jehovah's Witnesses"

"your libel... example of your prejudice"

"the distress and disruption that [[user:Tommstein]] (and to a lesser degree, though that's not saying much, [[user:Central]]) persists in... His non-stop verbal abuse... how he chooses to speak to people he does not agree with"

"you were just interested in providing yourself oppurtinity [sic] to trash the WTB&TS and me"

"Vandalism, harassment, verbal abuse... a witchhunter and wikistalker"

"yours [sic] and Tomm's derision... you and Tomm both are guilty of unreasonableness... Do you not see... You and Tomm have repeatedly demonstrated that you cannot do that, on top of being rude, disruptive, verbally abusive, and uncompromising... Tomm to a degree where he really needs to be blocked... Your misconceptions about our 'theocratic warfare' doctrine are beyond unreasonable and patent absurdity... you blanket your compromising abilities with your (perhaps intentionally) ignorant misconceptions... I know there's no such thing as true objectivity, but really man, try going for just a little bit"

"You are again misrepresenting... Why can you not accept that"

"libel, ambiguous, misleading, and in light of your (and Mini's) repeated reverts with NO attempt to compromise, deceitful... your libel... both you and Mini need to stop your slanderous, innacurate, POV"

"witchhunting the WTB&TS"

"I accuse you of deceit, bias, prejudice, and rhetoric... direct provocation by you or [[User:Central]]... 'biased, prejudiced, ignorant', or 'stupid'"

"libel of an entire translation"

Edit summary: "you don't even read what I say do you"

"your verbal abuse... your abuse"

"your missconception [sic]... You infer... nonsense"

"You and [[user:Mini]] refused compromise... how unreasonable the resistance is... such rediculous [sic] behavior"

"why do you discount the facts"

"libel"

"your verbal abuse... your abuse... your verbal abuse... you have always asserted yourself"

"you and [[user:Mini]] have refused any sort of compromise... neither you nor [[user:Central]] had ANY part in the process of compromise... You both provided nothing but an edit war and verbal abuse"

"Talk about the eight points then and not Franz... the fact that you and [user:Tommstein]]... You know no such evidence exists... Nonsense... some misguided notion of yours... Sheer nonsense... your pervasive prejudice... You seemed to insinuate... This is all nonsense"

"POV libel based on nothing more than highly prejudiced interpretations of fact... unwarranted libel of an entire translation based on subjective interpretation of highly biased sources"

"He has also completely disregarded your suggestion"

"assigned motive to your mistakes beyond the labels: 'prejudice' and 'bias'... could he possibly have been more vague... you started in with nonsense... I forgot about 1 book, big deal... at the least you and Tomm were guilty of verbal abuse, harrasment, and failure to follow the Wiki guideline of [[WP:AGF}Assuming Good Faith]]... Such nonsense... yours and Tomms hostile, and baseless, nonsense... your attacks... seeing your nonsense... Your continued and growing hostility... harassment"

"Your behavior got you banned... yours or [[user:Central]]'s endless verbal abuse and harassment... You even lied... your deceit... I hope your continued violations of the Administrators' guidelines gets you banned permanently"

Edit summary: "have you read the book?"

"the hostility"

"you are missunderstanding"

"I have been trying to get across to him for quite some time now"

"you cannot in good conscious [sic]"

Edit summary: "hostile, and redundant"

"NPOV, civility, violations as well as harassment... You assign malicious intent"

"the already extremely hostile editors of the NWT and related Jehovah's Witnesses pages ([[user:Central]] and [[user:Tommstein]]) yet another means to circumvent accuracy, NPOV, and this websites' highly ineffective conflict resolution process... nonsense... to maintain civility but it doesn't happen"

"Tommstein outright lied"

"this nonsense"

"How many times do you need to be banned"

"his recent violations of [[wp:NPA]] and general harassment... his or [[user:Central]]'s verbal abuse and non-stop harassment... such deceit... non-constructive and extremely hostile comments by Tomm"

Edit summary: "continued NPA, and Civility breaches as well as continued general harassment of the Jehovah's Witness and related pages"

"Tommstein is not interested in accuracy"

"[[Tommstein]]'s post-ban violations"

"Why can't you accept the unequivocal fact... Why can't you acknowledge... who cares if the answer isn't acceptable to you? I don't... proliferate nonsense... in order to dissuade interest in us... the root of your animosity"

"your previously baseless edit war, on top of your verbal abuse, sarcasm, harassment, and NPA violations... These past few weeks it has gone from: 'how many times must I point you to [[WP:Civ]], and [[WP:NPA]]', to: 'how many times a DAY do I have to point you to [[WP:Civ]] and [[WP:NPA]]"

"his animosity... he (and you) continuously perpetrate an air of hostility and verbal abuse... Stop harassing me"

"not only has he not stopped making personal attacks, his civility violations have only become more frequent and more bitter... His, and [[user:Central]]'s hostility has only grown... their hostility increases when the reaction of those they are hostile towards decreases... their abuse... Tomm and Central's hostility has grown more frequent and uncivil... Tomm has even taken to lying... His and Central's behavior is entirely uncalled for, yet it doesn't stop... enough to make all of Wikipedia rethink it's general aversion to permanent user bans"

"he edits it in such a way as to make it look like I was the one actually saying them"

"if this was official mediation you would stand a good chance of getting blocked"

"[[user:Central]] and [[user:Tommstein]] (then 66.158.232.37), [[Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses/archive 16#Unbelievers eternally destroyed?|harassed and verbally abused]] the editor... their misconceptions"

"you infer deceit... you refuse to accept"

"Your's and Tomm's unique beliefs... your hostility"

Edit summary: "stop harassing us"

"you're wrong... you seek to harass... your hostility"

"keep your comments directed towards Steve"

"you have misread"

"You are being entirely unreasonable and insulting"

"you are mistaken... the verbal abuse, provocation, and harassment of the above editors [[user:Tommstein]] and [[user:Centra]] [sic]"

Edit summary: "do something about this guy, it's entirely out of control"

"this guy's harassment is increasingly hostile and disruptive... he is out of control... his abuse... unacceptable behavior... only gotten worse since you initially blocked him for a day"

"your pervasive incivility... more people than you and Central who hold the same misconceptions... be civil"

"if you won't then I must request arbitration"

User: Retcon/Missionary

Sub-user: Retcon

"your zealous endeavors... you obviously have a adverse view"

"get your terminology straight... Your logical [sic] is dizzying"

"you are taking a decidedly POV tactic... to wax a POV bent on the matter"

"you are getting your facts wrong... the party whining is the one who tries to spin articles in a POV perspective... You've clouded your biases though it appears they are becoming more evident day by day."

"critics such as Tomm who use strong arm tactics and are on the computer 24/7"

"Isn't there something better for them to fill their lives with than simply tearing down with irroneous facts and suppositions based on taking quotations out of context"

"Capiche?"

"you and Konrad would like nothing better than to have only your opposition sites listed... complaining"

"you persist in personal attacks... all you end up doing on talk pages is deriding... From Tomm I can understand taking the low road"

"you are the master of breaking Wiki rules"

"your excessive vandalization... the double-standard culprit's vandalizing ways"

"your [sic] dumb"

"I know that means nothing to you"

Edit summary: "Talking a Wikipedian down off his ledge"

"you are bordering on the absurd"

"strongarm those in opposition"

"those that persist on remaining on Wiki 24/7 and mercilessly editing previous users posts"

"hate is their own personal religion and the only thing that brings them joy in life"

"Central with attacks and slanderous misrepresentations... much to the delight of these two detractors"

Sub-user: Missionary

"the beligerent"

"berate fellow users... mock their belief system in a disrespectful manner... themselves vent hostility"

"Tit for tat"

"Tomm seems to have blinders"

Edit summary: "exposes your agenda"

"loves snide remarks"

"express some civility... such a demeanor... assigning blame"

"check your agenda... you miss the point on [sic] being objective"

"making snide remarks"

"It is Tomm&Central making accusations... Tommtral [sic] with [sic] condemn the edits... he/they are so adamant"

"the character assassinator"

"beligerent individual... lodges personal attacks on fellow posters rather than add useful content"

"POV attacks attempting to discredit an organization he is no longer associated with"

User: Cobaltbluetony

"Individuals like these are prone to try"

"see his/her real motives"

"Biased reviewers here"

"this might prove to be difficult to you"

"indicative of his general malaise... I find his argumentative tone to be strikingly similar to that used by Russian and Eastern Orthodox maligners, the kind that elicit repeated inquiries by the European Court of Human Rights... does not seem to grasp the validity of anything beyond his own viewpoint... he slings the insults and degradations around... he does not appear to be a competant [sic] editor... obviously is not interested in truth"

"excommunicated, disillusioned, or otherwise discontent"

"disaffected individuals"

"Baloney... You presume"

"You should work for a politician's press secretary... you seem to utilize only to discredit... disgruntled people... Why you persist in wasting your time... you are so adamant... your views, as well as the views of those with whom you have spoken, are JADED"

Edit summary: "childish, rude, dishonest, and futile"

"you are not editing faithfully... you have no right... your incindiary [sic] edits... you are genuinely HURTING people... you accuse Witnesses... you are insistent on spreading biased language"

"You can't see, can you... you attribute intent and motive... You apply POV standards"

"emotion and bias based on your view... I highly doubt that statement means anything to you... your preoccupation with a handful of disgruntled former members... you cannot produce an unbiased edit"

"you cannot accept... you do not belong here"

"DF'ed and disgruntled JW Wikipedians"

"you stir up contention... precisely the attitude that inhibits real progress"

"This suggest [sic] something counterproductive about your participation... trying to dissect, discredit and dismantle"

"you have a problem"

"They wish to pick apart the faith, and can't just get on with their lives... Instead of growing on a positive level with their new beliefs, their goals remain to harrass, chase down, berate, belittle, intimidate, anger, trip up, stumble and tear down... I challenge them to operate purely on an academic level. They cannot... they cannot maintain their composure, or help but belittle or talk down... attempt to intimidate by insult and accusations flying everywhere... discredit the integrity of this resource"

"toss on some belligerent asides... You strike me as no different... you have ye [sic] ro [sic] step up to the table... You can try to intimidate me"

"you have no basis to speak... disgruntled ex-members... But you wouldn't know"

"regain your composure"

"dancing gleefully at the chance to further twist, malign, and decontextualize... I suppose in your world"

"Tit for tat... detractors such as yourself... how can you possibly be expected to provide and maintain edits that are fair?... your rage towards us... wonder as to your motivations... Yes, your motivations are clear... You need to relax... your 'war' against Witnesses... you and your cohorts continue to deal with this forum unacademically, unscholarly, and without civility... you are louder and more unbearable... who can respect you?... you misquote, mischaracterize, and villify"

"the volatile and tenacious nature of certain editors... subliminal goal is to detract from Jehovah's Witnesses at any and every opportunity"

"who have nothing better to do, and who have no real academic integrity... you perpetuate this absurd 'war'... surreptitiously calculated edits"

"the volatile and tenacious nature of certain editors... subliminal goal is to detract from Jehovah's Witnesses at any and every opportunity"

"you refuse to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]]"

"you insist on shoving your excerpts into the articles... you do not yet fully understand or accept the concept of NPOV... Until you yourself remain focused on the facts and presenting them in NPOV"

"You are the one who seems to want/need the answer"

"It seems as if you are on a eitch [sic] hunt"

"[[Central]] and [[Tommstein]] WANT to debate what you beleive [sic] and disrupt your faith... let them continue to sit outside and 'weep and gnash their teeth.'"

"the angry editors... I can influence others into becoming better and more well-rounded Wikipedians"

"the same dumb words over and over"

"You really need to find a positive and relaxing hobby"

"the abuses that seem to persist with [[User:Tommstein|Tommstein]] and [[User:Central|Central]]... the disrespectful and unkind conduct of others... not to engage [[User:Tommstein|Tommstein]] and [[User:Central|Central]] in any discussion pages or user pages, or anyone else who exhibits similar behaviors regarding opinions and beliefs that conflict with theirs"

"you continue to attack him... that unforgiving harshness... Yours happens to be strongly opposed to Witnesses, not simply different... opposition causes you to view everything you see as 'just another example' of some deceptive undertone... deliberate subversions... the truth of the church of Tommstein!... you're taking the beliefs of exclusivity that Witnesses hold and are turning them back on them out of spite!... you can't accept that others believe them... anyone who professes to have found inner peace with their beliefs and acts in harmony with that claim is rarely ever seen pounding at the beliefs of others... critics, detractors or disaffected former members... you pollute the integrity of the articles"

"you, on the other hand, barrel on like a freight train... Admitting any flaw on your part means having to subject yourself to the possibility that other editors might treat you the same way you treat them"

"unrelenting and unable to forgive and forget... what goes around comes around"

"You again assume bad faith... what goes around comes around... Now that you're done drifting off of your arbitor's station"

"{{user|Tommstein}} and {{user|Central}}'s goal of misrepresenting Witnesses... every point they try to force... the tone and bizzare viewpoint... the effort is not a simple and sincere interest in editing an encyclopedia article, but to portray Witnesses and their beliefs in the negative and scornful hue in which they themselves see them... Concerted effort is used to bash their views into the faces of other editors... complete with insult and insinuation... designed to derail any serious effort into presenting a truly [[WP:NPOV|NPOV]] article"

"if you were interested in editing out superfluous and nonsensical info"

"your attitude is not like a serious [[Wikipedian]]... making a fool of yourself"

"if you have a problem with that"

"the abusive behavior of [[User:Tommstein|Tommstein]] and [[User:Central|Central]]... this behavior did not start it. It had been started long before that"

"your abusiveness, condescending tone, and other all-out attacks on Witnesses and JW Wikipedians... you have been 'at it' for a long time... Your immutable, spurious, and enraged rampage... reveals your own true colors... Your message, your approach, and your overall demeanor makes many others uncomfortable... You are making participation in this process undesireable... your angry rhetoric... you [sic] ability to provide [[WP:NPOV|NPOV]] edits becomes highly qurestionable [sic]"

"Camels through needles' eyes, Tomm"

"stirring up more contention... you misquote passages from our literature... you do not really know what Witnesses believe"

"[[User:Tommstein|Tommstein]] and [[User:Central|Central]] are not forgiving people... There is no genuine conciliatory attitude, graciousness, objectivity, or other effort to move forward"

"unforgiving, vindictive, and unproductive... the vitriol that has been thrown in our direction... provoking -- a skillset they demonstrate repeatedly"

"Your interpretive skills remain consistent"

"does not understand the format and tone of this resource... you were in the wrong"

"a slant on your part"

"rereading the policy may be a ball back in your court"

"antagonizing and instigating... seriously detracts from the goal of producing an NPOV set of articles... call them on their manners and unfair editing... repeatedly bombarded with rude, uncivil, insulting and denegrating responses, and any effort to obtain an NPOV edit was shot back"

"patently opinionated POV"

"now would we?"

" if your intentions were at least 50% noble... I like to see you rant and rave... you are only proving without a doubt who and what you really are... exactly the opposite of who and what you unconvincingly claim you are... snide comment... every minute point you drag out [ad nauseum]]... aiming to trip others up or misspeak (and call it lies if you can)... your intentions become increasingly difficult to hide"

"you perceive, or would like others to perceive, an intent to deceive... a POV bias against an editor on your part"

"Your personal definition of tolerance... editing with a view to present your own opinion... not really good faith editing... you cannot support the idea... Translation: find articles, research, etc."

"academically irresponsible... personal interpretations... personal interpretations... interfere with the accuracy of the articles"

"wrong motives to your own arguments... the hostile and insulting manner in which you address this issue"

"you are not aiming at NPOV editing... using this forum to take exception to Witnesses' beliefs, not merely documenting them... one would think that a serious editor would be more careful in engaging editors from opposing viewpoint"

"insulting, uncivil, or otherwise hostile tonee [sic]... accusations that are pelted upon anyone who dares cross certain editors"

"certain editors will invariably (and predictably) raise a fuss until everyone else feels physically nasueated [sic]"

"the amount of information the actual opposer-editors want to include"

"One word/thought for [[User:Central|Central]] : Focus."

"intended to malign"

"you need new experiences... there is alot of emotion behind your discussions and edits... somewhere along the line you did not feel the warmth of your brothers... people who don't appreciate it"

"have their own agendas"