User:Usman Warsi
.:: USMAN WARSI ::.[edit]
An enthusiastic & energetic personality, determined to vanquish the impediments of creativity in the field of Music. A Singer, a Poet, a Professional Music Composer a Computer Programmer, invites your exquisite group to knock on usmanwarsi.com to unveil the vague & skittish, styles & angulations plunged into the fathomess depths of his aesthetic thoughts, ideas & skills. The mirror of his untiring endeavors is set to reflect your dreams in your ears, on your screens & on your papers to witness the world of Warsi's creations.
CONTACT
Email: usman.warsi@gmail.com
EXTERNAL LINKS
MY EXPERT SERVICES
I can help you in the following catagories:
1 - Audio Songs
2 - Video Songs
3 - Audio Editing
4 - Video Editing
5 - Jingles
6 - Adds
7 - Songs Lyrics
8 - All kind of Story Boards
WHAT I AM THINKING ABOUT MUSIC?
What is music? The word is such a vague term covering everything from the whistle of a janitor to the beauty of Beethoven’s 5th. The American Heritage Dictionary describes music as “The art of organizing tones to produce a coherent sequence of sounds intended to elicit an aesthetic response in a listener.” True as that may be, does it really give the description music deserves?
To begin with, we know that music is an art, and there are facts to support that statement. To start, we must agree that an art is something specifically created to initiate an emotional response from the person(s) experiencing it. Now because hearing is a sense, and music is something we hear, music is, therefore, an art. Of course, music is much more than organized tones. Music is also the life work of many people. Music is hundreds of sound-producing devices. And music is and has been the initiative of tears and smiles since the birth of mankind. But what characteristics must something hold to be considered “musical”? Must it be melodic? or could nails on a chalkboard be titled musical? Perhaps the term musical refers to something that merely grasps the attention of it’s listener through hearing?
Finally, is music always intending to “elicit an aesthetic response in a listener.”? Perhaps sometimes it is desired that music scare or anger the listener? Can’t music be a form of teasing or torturing its listener?
In conclusion, it is safe to say that the broad term music can be described in as many ways as a musician could perform a sonata. Maybe music isn’t meant to be explained. Maybe it’s just meant to be heard.
Music is science: It is exact, specific; and it demands exact acoustics. A Conductor's full score is a chart, a graph which indicates frequencies, intensities, volume changes, melody, and harmony all at once and with the most exact control of time.
Music is mathematical: It is rhythmically based on the subdivisions of time into fractions which must be done, not worked out on paper.
Music is a foreign language: Most of the terms are in Italian, German, or French; and the notation is certainly not English - but a highly developed kind of shorthand that uses symbols to represent ideas. The semantics of music is the most complete and universal language.
Music is history: Music usually reflects the environment and times of its creations, often even the country and/ or racial feeling.
Music is physical education: It requires fantastic coordination of finger, hands, arms, lip, cheek, and facial muscles, in addition to extraordinary control of the diaphragmatic, back, stomach, and chest muscles, which respond instantly to the sound the ear hears and the mind interprets.
Music is all of these things, but most of all Music is art: It allows a human being to take all these dry, technically boring (but difficult) techniques and use them to create emotion. That is one thing science cannot duplicate: humanism, feeling, emotion, call it what you will.