User talk:Kralizec!/Archive 2009: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
←Replaced content with 'I'm still here asshole! I got 300 new accounts. Now shut up and go away!!!' |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm still here asshole! I got 300 new accounts. Now shut up and go away!!! |
|||
{{Administrator}} |
|||
{{User talk:Kralizec!/Talk header}} |
|||
<!--Please add new messages to the BOTTOM of the page--> |
|||
<!--Please add {{talkback}} templates to the "Talkback sink" section below--> |
|||
== Talkback sink == |
|||
Please drop all {{tl|talkback}} type messages (aka "I have responded to your message on my own talk page") in '''this''' section. Thanks, [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 05:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
{{talkback|Call me Bubba}} |
|||
{{Talkback|kotra|RE: AIV report declined}} |
|||
{{talkback|Zvika|RE: AIV report declined}} |
|||
{{talkback|Wpwatchdog|Thank you}} |
|||
{{reply|PatPeter|Friendly note regarding talk page messages}} |
|||
{{Talkback|Marek69|Thanks for the reverts!}} |
|||
{{Talkback|DFS454}} |
|||
{{Talkback|Glasscity09}} |
|||
== What is your problem deleting "Chicago Film Producers Alliance" == |
|||
We were still discussing this page. What is your problem deleting it?--[[User:ATurnerIII|ATurnerIII]] ([[User talk:ATurnerIII|talk]]) 17:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:I don't care for a subjective and inconsistent process. And the fact that you and others have group think and banded together to delete the article is more evidence of the site's weakness. Sure, I can have more 3rd party article written about CFPA and will. In fact, they are being writting now. But, it's too late. This has become a legal issue. I'm in contact with my attornies about antitrusut violations and soon will contact the site's owner. You can't accept other similar groups for different reasons and selectively reject CFPA. It's illegal. And rest assured, when the summons are issued, your name will be on one.--[[User:ATurnerIII|ATurnerIII]] ([[User talk:ATurnerIII#top|talk]]) 00:26, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Paki90 == |
|||
Hmmm ... I'm inclined to [[WP:AGF|extend a little good faith]], after reading his talk page message. But he must understand that this is his absolute last chance, and even one slip-up will result in an indefblock with no preliminaries. [[User:Blueboy96|Blueboy]][[User talk:Blueboy96|96]] 15:58, 1 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Yeah, that should work ... how many other admins besides us are waiting with raised banhammers for this guy? [[User:Blueboy96|Blueboy]][[User talk:Blueboy96|96]] 18:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Just wondering ... I don't think we'd have too much trouble getting support for a ban if it came to that, since the community has very little tolerance for that kind of behavior. So let's present it to him--take it or leave it. [[User:Blueboy96|Blueboy]][[User talk:Blueboy96|96]] 18:14, 1 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Thanks == |
|||
Thanks for your nice message. I appreciate the time you took and your contacting me about it. Have a happy New Year!--[[User:RandomHumanoid|<font color = "green">'''R'''</font><font color = "blue">andom</font><font color = "green">'''H'''</font><font color = "blue">umanoid</font>]]<sup>([[User_talk:RandomHumanoid|<font color="crimson">⇒</font>]])</sup> 18:52, 1 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
: But I will add, that was actually a rather impressive hoax attempt. Given the effort that must have gone into writing those lengthy articles, I suspect someone was trying to measure how long a blatant hoax can pass unnoticed here. :) --[[User:RandomHumanoid|<font color = "green">'''R'''</font><font color = "blue">andom</font><font color = "green">'''H'''</font><font color = "blue">umanoid</font>]]<sup>([[User_talk:RandomHumanoid|<font color="crimson">⇒</font>]])</sup> 18:57, 1 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==Wow== |
|||
Wow - it's so uncluttered here, and it takes just a moment to load. I see you take the same attitude towards archiving as the people in the Middle Ages had towards baths - once a year, whether you need it or not!--<span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype">[[User:Kubigula|Kubigula]] ''([[User talk:Kubigula|talk]])''</span> 19:44, 1 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Collateral damage from Angelo de la Paz block == |
|||
{{user|Sanada Yuki-kun}} is requesting exemption from the autoblock. He seems legit. Can you review? [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 15:46, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==Talk page comments== |
|||
thanks for your comment, I was told by another admin ages ago that official block notices should be left on the page, especially whilst this block is in force. this user has had a recent history of extensive vandalism and has been warned on several occasions. blanking the page gives the reader no indication of this. [[User:Michellecrisp|Michellecrisp]] ([[User talk:Michellecrisp|talk]]) 22:44, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== geek == |
|||
come on you fat bitch why are u going round deleting peoples wikipedia pages if were just trying to spread the word of Kosu u little faggot get a life why would u spend all ur time goin round wikipedia editing i mean seriously ur "college sweetheart" must be so fat that u cant have sex with her so u wank off to editing wiki instead <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Swaaaaan|Swaaaaan]] ([[User talk:Swaaaaan|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Swaaaaan|contribs]]) 10:01, 9 January 2009</span><!-- Template:Unsigned2 --> |
|||
:Meet my friend [[WP:RBI]]. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 15:23, 9 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::I agree, This guy is sad, He has go no life so he gets his kicks out of deleting peoples pages and then blocking them because hes afraid of CONFLICT! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Seahorse Kosu|Seahorse Kosu]] ([[User talk:Seahorse Kosu|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Seahorse Kosu|contribs]]) 08:28, 12 January 2009</span><!-- Template:Unsigned2 --> |
|||
== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008) == |
|||
The '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Outreach/Newsletter December 2008|December 2008 issue]]''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by [[User:BrownBot|BrownBot]] ([[User talk:BrownBot|talk]]) 03:39, 10 January 2009 (UTC)</small> |
|||
== RE:Message at [[User talk:195.158.85.3]] == |
|||
Erm it was only 10 minutes after he had been blocked not 31 hours. The anonblock template only provides more information. I had accidently supplied a warning when the i.p. was blocked so I felt it was the right thing to do. [[User:Freakmighty|FM]] <small>[ [[User_talk:Freakmighty|<span style="color:#000000">talk to me</span>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Freakmighty|<span style="color:#000000">show contributions</span>]] ]</small> 11:34, 11 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:I just had a look and a message has come up which advises to use that template. A bit too late now. [[User:Freakmighty|FM]] <small>[ [[User_talk:Freakmighty|<span style="color:#000000">talk to me</span>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Freakmighty|<span style="color:#000000">show contributions</span>]] ]</small> 18:59, 11 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== banner== |
|||
I am not under any ban or warning. please do not keep putting the isp banner on my page as it violates my privacy. I will continue to remove it. [[Special:Contributions/69.14.244.157|69.14.244.157]] ([[User talk:69.14.244.157|talk]]) 20:04, 11 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Please help! == |
|||
User Ronz is continually harassing me on my talk page! Can you please do something about this? He's not an administrator and has a personal vendetta against me. [[Special:Contributions/69.14.244.157|69.14.244.157]] ([[User talk:69.14.244.157|talk]]) 20:04, 11 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SS John Stagg]] == |
|||
Hi, this article has been nominated for del.--[[User:Jmundo|J.Mundo]] ([[User talk:Jmundo|talk]]) 02:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== AIV report declined == |
|||
Hi Kralizec! (I guess I'm excited to talk to you). Concerning your comment [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=263633181&oldid=263633064 here], how should the user have been warned differently? No worries if you're busy, I'm just curious so I don't make more bad reports. -[[User:Kotra|kotra]] ([[User talk:Kotra|talk]]) 19:36, 12 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== That doesn't work == |
|||
And it was very foolish of you to try <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/124.120.155.90|124.120.155.90]] ([[User talk:124.120.155.90|talk]]) 11:01, 20 January 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Removal of warnings - question == |
|||
Thanks for your message; Regarding the policy on removal of warnings from talk pages in [[WP:USER]}...was that a recent change, or has it always been in place? I was involved in a similar case some time ago and the user in question ended up being blocked. Thanks. -- [[User:Gmatsuda|Gmatsuda]] ([[User talk:Gmatsuda|talk]]) 16:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
: Since you already answered this on [[WP:AIV]], please feel free to disregard. :-) -- [[User:Gmatsuda|Gmatsuda]] ([[User talk:Gmatsuda|talk]]) 16:05, 24 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Check out one of the versions of [[User talk:68.192.223.254]] that has the numerous vandalism warnings. The user blatantly vandalized two articles and then decided to be much more subtle in his/her vandalism by changing numbers in articles. The vandalism warnings came after the editor was asked to stop doing that because it doesn't conform to [[WP:MOSNUM]]. Despite that, the edits continued. At that point, vandalism warnings appeared to be the only course of action. Hope that helps. -- [[User:Gmatsuda|Gmatsuda]] ([[User talk:Gmatsuda|talk]]) 16:21, 24 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
: Hmmm...thought it was just warnings, not block notices as well, that could be removed. Sorry. -- [[User:Gmatsuda|Gmatsuda]] ([[User talk:Gmatsuda|talk]]) 23:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [[M.I.A. (artist)]] == |
|||
Can I have some help here please, a potentially very big BLP problem, I'm trying to keep the material off the article until/if it is sufficiently sourced. [[WP:RFPP]] is backlogged. — [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#4173E4">'''''Realist'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#D80B0B"><sup>'''''2'''''</sup></span>]] 04:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==Your response to my [[WP:AIV]] report...== |
|||
is currently being discussed on [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Severe_personal_attacks_bordering_on_vandalism]]. [[User:Kristen Eriksen|<font color="FF7700">'''The</font> <font color="FF4400">Nordic</font> <font color="red">Goddess</font> <font color="FF0066">Kristen'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Kristen Eriksen|<font color="FF0099">Worship her</font>]]</sup> 05:11, 25 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Hung == |
|||
Will you un-delete [[Hung (Napalm Death)]]. It was a single by the band, and it was released on a very notable [[Earache Records]]. It should never have been deleted through A7. [[User:Undead warrior|Undead Warrior]] ([[User talk:Undead warrior|talk]]) 10:40, 25 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User talk:NightHunter35]] == |
|||
Hello, and thank you for taking the time to read this message. I know that you have blocked this user once before, and was wondering if you could do something again. I do not necessarily mean blocking, but leaving a message of some sort as the user continues to delete the "track listing" from the [[Before I Self Destruct]] page. I have obviously tried to talk/warn this user numerous times, as have others, but this continues. If you can help, thank you. And if not, thank you anyway. <span>--'''[[User:JpGrB|H]][[User talk:JpGrB|E]][[User:JpGrB/My Userboxes|L]][[User:JpGrB/Articles I Created|L]]'''Ø Ŧ'''[[User:JpGrB/Wikiproject Wishlist|H]][[User:JpGrB/Sandbox/Archive 1|E]][[User:JpGrB/Sandbox|R]][[User:JpGrB/Sandbox 2|E]]'''</span> 18:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Talk Page Reverts == |
|||
Thank you for reverting my innappropriate edits. I was not aware that anon users were permitted to remove warnings from their own talk pages. I will use more care in the future. [[User:Nutiketaiel|Nutiketaiel]] ([[User talk:Nutiketaiel|talk]]) 16:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:That is certainly true. Well, I'll go back to doing my part to keep Wikipedia clean. [[User:Nutiketaiel|Nutiketaiel]] ([[User talk:Nutiketaiel|talk]]) 16:10, 28 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |
|||
|rowspan="2" valign="top" | [[Image:Civility barnstar.png]] |
|||
|rowspan="2" | |
|||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''Civility Award''' |
|||
|- |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | [[user:Nutiketaiel|I]] hereby award this [[WP:BARN|Barnstar]] to [[user:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] for his great civility, courtesy and fairness when dealing with my inadvertant policy violations. He is a shining example of the [[WP:AGF|Assume Good Faith]] doctrine and how Admins should act towards users. Well done. [[User:Nutiketaiel|Nutiketaiel]] ([[User talk:Nutiketaiel|talk]]) 17:14, 28 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
|||
You're welcome, and I meant every word of it. [[User:Nutiketaiel|Nutiketaiel]] ([[User talk:Nutiketaiel|talk]]) 18:35, 28 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== CSV article deleted == |
|||
Why have you deleted "costly state verification article"? |
|||
Did you find some definition somewhere that is comparable? |
|||
Are you qualified to make this judgment? |
|||
Also, why you haven't deleted the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_contract] "Complete contract" article? |
|||
Why you are destroying the work that I've done which very few individuals are capable to do? |
|||
[[User:V sq|V sq]] ([[User talk:V sq|talk]]) 19:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Notability criteria == |
|||
Please explain what you think would fit ''your'' "notability criteria? |
|||
Simple search on CSV provides over 160 thousands references to papers in major peer-reviewed scientific magazines. |
|||
And also, please explain why Complete contract article meets those criteria and this article doesn't. |
|||
I don't want to waste my time "improving" my already well-written article until I get some explanation due for the act of vandalism committed. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:V sq|V sq]] ([[User talk:V sq|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/V sq|contribs]]) 20:29, 28 January 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
==Deletion review for [[:Costly_state_verification]]== |
|||
An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#Costly_state_verification|deletion review]] of [[:Costly_state_verification]]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. <!-- This originally was from the template {{subst:DRVNote|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~ --> |
|||
[[User:V sq|V sq]] ([[User talk:V sq|talk]]) 20:53, 28 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Out of curiosity, what was the rationale for deleting it? The log says it's speedy under criterion A7, which does not apply. The comment also says expired prod. Which is applicable? —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 22:01, 28 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Bob Muran]] == |
|||
This is a blatant copyvio - how can you ''not'' speedy? – [[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 04:20, 29 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:OK you stubbified, no problem. – [[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 04:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Please take another look at this -- user has added back all the copyvio material. – [[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 16:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== OTRS for Bob Muran == |
|||
The ticket no. 2009012810027179 refers to the text and NOT the photo. --[[User:Zureks|Zureks]] ([[User talk:Zureks|talk]]) 16:37, 29 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Re: Thanks! == |
|||
No problem ;) [[User:Inferno, Lord of Penguins|<span style="color:#FF0000">Inferno, </span>]] [[User talk:Inferno, Lord of Penguins|<span style="color:#FFA500">Lord of </span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Inferno, Lord of Penguins|<span style="color:#FFFF00">Penguins</span>]] 00:41, 31 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==75.108.73.219== |
|||
Many thanks on blocking that user. Take Care...<small style="border:1px solid #990000;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#990000;background:#FFFFFF;">NeutralHomer</font>]] • [[User_talk:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#000000;background:#FFFFFF;">Talk</font>]] • February 2, 2009 @ 00:22</small> |
|||
:Thanks for the note. I actually didn't know that the policy included anon users too. I knew it included signed in account users like you and me, but I thought when it came to anons they weren't allowed to do so, hence my revision. I learned something there. Take Care...<small style="border:1px solid #990000;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#990000;background:#FFFFFF;">NeutralHomer</font>]] • [[User_talk:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#000000;background:#FFFFFF;">Talk</font>]] • February 2, 2009 @ 01:14</small> |
|||
== Edit war == |
|||
I am trying to improve the [[German Shepherd Dog]] article with a gallery and more and better pictures. The old ones does not illustrate the dog article well, being dark and unclear. User : Ameliorate is reverting the pictures. I removed one because it is uncertain if it should be in the article, (Young Alsatian and Sheperd mix) but the rest should stay. |
|||
He reverted them 3 times already : |
|||
14:41, 2 February 2009 Ameliorate! (Talk | contribs) (25,448 bytes) (→Description: rv photo back |
|||
01:31, 3 February 2009 Ameliorate! (Talk | contribs) (25,381 bytes) (there is more than |
|||
13:53, 3 February 2009 Ameliorate! (Talk | contribs) (25,381 bytes) (1) don't add a messy, ugly gallery |
|||
That gallery is not uggly. |
|||
And I think removing it is also constitutes vandalism. |
|||
[[User:Warrington|Warrington]] ([[User talk:Warrington|talk]]) 17:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Thanks for your answer. Ok, than that means that it is not vandalism, only an edit war. Sorry. The other editor seems to revert me without dicussing anything. I have to note that have been encouraged many times to add galleries to articles, when there was a lot of nice pictures which were not used in the article on Commons. That because many readers do not know how to find them. A dog article, I belive should show good pictures about the dog breed, I think this is one of the main reasons why people want to read dog articles. I think that pictures are an important part of the articles, wich, if you remove the pictures, will consist of a large amount of text without any visual documentation. |
|||
[[User:Warrington|Warrington]] ([[User talk:Warrington|talk]]) 19:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Not justified == |
|||
I am not an administrator, however, I feel that you as an administrator has abused your authority for the blocking of Klasyays. One administrator declined the unblock request for the reason of a 'direct threat of harm'. When you read the Wikipedia polices to blocking it does not cover the type of comment made by Klasyays as the comment was not a direct threat of harm. Because the comment could have meant anything with no stating threat embedded within it, then multiple emotions could have arisen from the recipient, in this case it would seem the comment is threatening, but blocking someone when there is doubt of there true intentions is unjust to Wikipedia policies and an abuse of your administration. I hereby strongly request the immediate unblocking of this user. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Shawtydoit|Shawtydoit]] ([[User talk:Shawtydoit|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Shawtydoit|contribs]]) 05:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Hello from french user [[Arapaima]] == |
|||
Hello Kralizec ! I am completing an article on WP:fr about [[Donald Thomson]] , an australian anthropologist (1901-1970) who worked on the ground and fought from the '30 to the '60 for Indigenous Australians rights recognition. I found your beautiful aerial view of Ranger Uranium Mine, and should like to know if you would accept its being deposited into [[Donald Thomson]] french article. BTW, what an amazing user's page is yours! Congrats, and hope I'll hear from you soon. --[[User:Arapaima|Arapaima]] ([[User talk:Arapaima|talk]]) 15:39, 4 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks a lot, "Kralizec!" for your allowance about "Kakadu U*-mine aerial photo". And for your humor & kindness too, which differ notably from "Justin"'s pertness (cf on my user-page, his reaction after I dared to blunder into his article about who founded the first european settlement on Falkland Islands : "I dont wish to dampen your enthusiasm...but I delete").Some tips if you travel again through francophone lands : 1/ blank looks can be easily transformed in latin-lover looks (to be used with parcimony though...). 2/ and here are 3 "phrases passe-partout" (master-key sentences) : with a woman : "Vous êtes trés jolie" (you are so pretty)- & with a man "Vous êtes trés sympa" (you are so nice) - & at the restaurant :"C'était trés bon" (it was so good). As I deduce from your discuss.-page that you are quite stolid, and as you already know "merci beaucoup", you ought to fare well.That's my wish; hope we meet again some other day... --[[User:Arapaima|Arapaima]] ([[User talk:Arapaima|talk]]) 16:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Thank You == |
|||
Thanks for protecting the [[Erica Durance]] page. [[User:Rbanzai|Rob Banzai]] ([[User talk:Rbanzai|talk]]) 22:12, 6 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Dune == |
|||
Your vote pleased me a lot, as I'm devoted both to Frank Herberts' Dune (read it many times) and movie & mini-series. At first I was a bit disappointed by both movie and mini-series, but gradually I grown to like them both :-) [[User:SpeedyGonsales|SpeedyGonsales]] ([[User talk:SpeedyGonsales|talk]]) 13:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==[[User:217.41.243.16]]== |
|||
{{user|217.41.243.16}} has received four warnings, how many do they need? [[User:AnyPerson|AnyPerson]] ([[User talk:AnyPerson|talk]]) 18:39, 7 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Thanks, I appreciate the second look. [[User:AnyPerson|AnyPerson]] ([[User talk:AnyPerson|talk]]) 02:21, 8 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==Ohio meetup== |
|||
Brainstorming is [[Wikipedia:Meetup/Ohio 1|taking place]]! Feel free to check it out, and make sure to add your name to the possible attendees if you'd like more information, as this page is mostly gauging interest at the moment. '''<font face="times new roman">[[User:hmwith|<span style="background:#999;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">hmwith</span>]][[User talk:hmwith|<span style="background:#666;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">τ</span>]]</font>''' 02:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Where should the Ohio meet up take place? The best option is probably wherever the most people can attend, so you opinion counts. See [[Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Ohio 1#Location !vote]]. '''<font face="times new roman">[[User:hmwith|<span style="background:#999;color:#fff;padding:0 4px">hmwith</span>]][[User talk:hmwith|<span style="background:#666;padding:0 4px;color:#fff;">τ</span>]]</font>''' 20:49, 11 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Thanks == |
|||
Thanks for semi-protecting the [[Kazuhito Yamashita]] page, disallowing anon edits. [[User:Whosafraidofthedark|Whosafraidofthedark]] ([[User talk:Whosafraidofthedark|talk]]) 21:55, 8 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009) == |
|||
The '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Outreach/Newsletter January 2009|January 2009 issue]]''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by [[User:BrownBot|BrownBot]] ([[User talk:BrownBot|talk]]) 04:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC)</small> |
|||
== Lame == |
|||
Yeah, lame for sure. I'll be five years here in two days time. I guess the responsibility was on me and I should've just ignored it all as I knew before hand what that guy was like, though I didn't know he still bore a grudge. Feel free to add it to the [[WP:LAME]] page as my well-deserved trout slapping. [[User:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Deacon of Pndapetzim]] (<small>[[User talk:Deacon of Pndapetzim|Talk]]</small>) 18:08, 10 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Huh? == |
|||
Precisely what did you mean by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADeacon_of_Pndapetzim&diff=269820911&oldid=269709402 this]? You know that his conduct was unbecoming of an admin, yet, you'd have "most likely" cast a stone in the other direction? It would help explain why groups of editors become anti-admin after a while. One rotten fruit can make all of them look rotten; but it's a real shame for the project when that happens. The only reason he wasn't strongly admonished for his conduct was because every admin who wanted to respond knew that it'd have fallen on blind eyes - and I know that for a fact because I was told so by 3 respectable admins who were trying to make sure I stayed calm. Other than mischaracterising my posts, he's been stirring this up from the beginning, and tried very hard at the end, despite Kurykh's message to stop. |
|||
First he's going to say something needs to be done, then he's going to make up a grudge, and next he's going to make up something else. Why bother noting that his comments are uncalled for? Howwwww pointlesssss...instead, seeing it's most likely, might as well cast a stone in the other direction, rightttt? Thanksssss...thankssss soooo sooooo muchhhh...words cannot express my appreciation for thisssss, Kralizec! [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 06:58, 11 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
<small>Message removed [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kralizec!&diff=prev&oldid=269996359] by author, and restored by me since we are continuing the discussion. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 15:53, 11 February 2009 (UTC)</small> |
|||
:Sorry I was not more clear. I -and probably everyone else- recognize that his extended block was way over the top. However it was fixed in short order and the issue resolved. Everyone makes mistakes, and I see little point in riding people mercilessly when they screw up. However your insistence on "having the last word" with the aggressively worded resolved tag was also way over the top ... which is probably why three different people tried to re-write it to be more neutral. |
|||
:However since you have not reverted the latest person to re-write the tag using neutral language, I will assume that you have recognized your mistake and decided to stop edit warring over the issue. As I said earlier, I do not believe in riding people over their mistakes, which is why I am not going to cast any stones. |
|||
:Everyone wins when people learn from their mistakes, so personally, I am thrilled that you and Deacon both gained from this otherwise unpleasant situation. Again I apologize for any misunderstandings caused by my lack of specifics. Thank you, [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 14:04, 11 February 2009 (UTC) ''(original reply [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANcmvocalist&diff=269999496&oldid=269352561] copied from [[User talk:Ncmvocalist]])'' |
|||
::I agree, everyone makes mistakes; but that's a mitigating factor rather than a justification. And of course, I'm not blameless; ideally, if I was a user of another status, I wouldn't have cared enough to insist so. I'd have gotten over this by now, but given that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dayewalker/Ncm this], in my opinion, expresses an intention of pursuing dispute resolution, this is still an issue. |
|||
::If for a moment, there was a glimpse that he understood what the mistake was, I would've overlooked him refactoring my comment and we wouldn't even have gotten this far. He showed all appearances against understanding the problem and was unreceptive to the feedback he got from no less than 5 users at the discussion. He then tried to hide the problem in the concluding tag by talking about motives that don't exist (in editsummary, discussion, and subsequent discussions - including above!) Other than being provocative, what does that intend on achieving? In other words, he did not act in a way that you'd expect an admin to, even after the mistake. |
|||
::Dayewalker wound up climbing on a high horse and reverted on the grounds that Deacon is an admin. That was plainly unhelpful in the absence of discussing it with me or notifying me, in the presence of 5 users having a problem with Deacon's action, and given that the tag was written by the most involved user of all: Deacon. Until Alex's intervention, Deacon continued revert-warring. |
|||
::I would've walked past your message as I considered it closed. But as Dayewalker would've no doubt added your message into the diffs collection and construed it to mean that I'm the sole problem here, I felt a need to speak. I was annoyed that you suggested casting a stone in my direction without looking at the mitigating factors from my perspective. You've talked about 3 users reverting; I'm talking about 5 users opinions on his action, and several other users who strongly feel on his general approach to adminning - merely insisting on writing out this opinion does not make it a personal attack, nor does it warrant having the stone flung in my direction. I made one mistake in reverting; but he didn't merely just make mistakes in his block, and his reverting - he did more than that. Hope you understand what I'm getting at. [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 14:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::If you are concerned about a DR or RfC from Dayewalker, then [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAlex_Bakharev&diff=270000843&oldid=269844810 this] may help put it into perspective. Regarding your "3 users reverting vs. 5 users' opinions" concern ... having an admin decision reversed via AN/I consensus rarely causes more than a trout-slapping for the admin who screwed up (again, most of us recognize that everyone makes mistakes). However edit warring is against policy and often results in people getting blocked. As an un-involved admin, I see both issues as being a concern, however only one might necessitate administrative action on the part of me or other admins. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 15:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC) ''(original reply [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANcmvocalist&diff=270014568&oldid=270008375] copied from [[User talk:Ncmvocalist]])'' |
|||
::::I don't see how the diff you provided puts it into perspective - please explain. |
|||
::::If there was to be prevention, it wouldn't be equitable to make me the only one. Just because 1 other editor mirrored his revert or because he made less reverts or just because he has tools is no justification. (Note: Alex acted to try to resolve the dispute on the actual page, rather than use the same revert) Again, the user you would not throw a stone at was playing games. If you're experienced with dealing tendentious/problem/civil-pov pushing editors, you will not find it difficult to see the edit-war mentality in [[User:Deacon_of_Pndapetzim/How_to_win_a_revert_war|this]]: eg ''will ameliorate the bad appearance of "edit warring" in any random admin's eyes'' should make your alarm bells ring, along with the rest. Would you be able to justify inequitable blocks in the interests of this project? No. Enforcing the relevant policy in such a manner was not how it was envisaged by the community, yet, if you were throwing stones, you say you'd promote his mentality in the name of a letter rather than what was intended in spirit. ArbCom wanted admins to enforce policy that is both in letter and spirit, rather than just to the letter. This comment may not be worded very well, but I think you'll understand the point it makes. [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 17:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Whoops, looks like I pasted the wrong diff. Here is what I meant to say: "If you are concerned about a DR or RfC from Dayewalker (a la [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAlex_Bakharev&diff=270000843&oldid=269844810]), then [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard&diff=269634348&oldid=269632919 this] may help put it into perspective." Sorry for the mixup. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 20:41, 11 February 2009 (UTC) ''(original reply [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANcmvocalist&diff=270072614&oldid=270061614] copied from [[User talk:Ncmvocalist]])'' |
|||
::::::Cheers; that's fine - but that diff page will need to be deleted at some point. [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 06:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
(OD)Luckily, I have Kralizec's talkpage watchlisted, or I would never have known I was being discussed here. Ncm, I began making out that page when it became apparent you were not going to stop your edit war to make your opinion known in the resolved tag. As I said, I consider the entire discussion [[WP:LAME|lame]] and reverted you once, then stopped. My edit summary clearly said "There's no need to edit war commentary into the resolved tag, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=269498313]" and as such, I wasn't going to. You seemed dead-set on changing the tag to reflect your opinion on the situation, both adding the "punitive" tag and replacing it five more times. You were edit warring, and I filed the diffs away in case you wouldn't listen to reason. When you were reverted by the third different editor, you stopped, and so I did not file a report of any sort. Your comments to me and to other editors (and indeed, above) didn't seem to show that you understood what had happened and that you were edit warring, so I just finished the page and saved it. |
|||
I have no desire to file a report on you. I'd much rather not have contact with you again, to be honest. At the same time, if this situation comes up again (as you seem to keep returning to it), I'd like to have the diffs available to show any admin my conduct. |
|||
Since this same discussion appears at Ncm's page, I'll also repeat these comments over there. Kralizec!, apologes for taking up your time with this. I appreciate your patience. [[User:Dayewalker|Dayewalker]] ([[User talk:Dayewalker|talk]]) 03:24, 12 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Despite the fact that I'd quite clearly said that this was over, and did not take any further action, you still chose to compile that page; this was the sole cause for me initiating this discussion both here, and Alex's talk page, despite considering this informally resolved. In these circumstances, I see no good cause to have created this page so late in the dispute - but what's done is done. Thing is, if you intend on keeping that page like similar pages you've created earlier (including as far back as December last year), then I will make a move to have them deleted, as some or all or not compliant with userspace requirements. I hope it will not become necessary for me to do so. In this case particularly, those diffs, as well as the accompanying commentary, aren't designed to show your conduct in this matter as you assert at the end of your comment. My views on your involvement and approach to this are already well known so I need not repeat them. The only part of your comment that is worth explicit endorsement at this point is about rather not having contact with you again - that's mutual. [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 06:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Your block == |
|||
You blocked me for disruptive editing. What kind? Where it is visible?--[[Special:Contributions/71.252.55.101|71.252.55.101]] ([[User talk:71.252.55.101|talk]]) 00:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Thank you for your question on my talk page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kralizec!&diff=next&oldid=270471852]. You were blocked for [[WP:DE|disruptive editing]] as per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=270137939&oldid=270137041 this] report at [[WP:AIV|Administrator intervention against vandalism]]. Specifically for edits to the [[Jasenovac concentration camp]] article, after ignoring [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:71.252.55.101&diff=prev&oldid=270146700 these warnings]. Wikipedia works by [[WP:CON|consensus]], so if someone reverts your changes to an article, you should discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page, rather than just reverting the other person. Blindly reverting other editors rather than discussing things will most likely result in your being blocked again. Please let me know if you have any other questions or issues. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 00:31, 14 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
''(reply [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A71.252.55.101&diff=270564884&oldid=270561575] copied from [[User talk:71.252.55.101]])'' |
|||
*The above does not constitute any right for this block. I was open for discussion and did not see any willing for discussion of those who sent 'warnings'. These 'warnings' are mere personal attacks and when calling upon rules you have to weight it against reality and not just exercise your ability to block me. About 'consensus' - many changes done there are done by other without any consensus and against basic editorial ethics. Very bad thing that your accusation like "Blindly reverting other editors rather than discussing" is applicable to the accusers - not to me. ''What you are doing here -is just throwing blind accusations against me in order to justify your block.'' Just see my talk page - I am again pestered by people who are not willing to discuss anything - rather to blindly disqualify me. I am even a money contributor to Wikipedia and I am going to ask a few questions Mr Wales about very roots of his idea that everyone can contribute and about Wikipedia's administrators--[[Special:Contributions/71.252.55.101|71.252.55.101]] ([[User talk:71.252.55.101|talk]]) 19:02, 14 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Thanks == |
|||
Thanks for the reminder. [[User:Techman224|<font color="339933">'''Techman224'''</font>]][[User talk:Techman224|<font color="3300ff">'''<sup>Talk</sup>'''</font>]] 22:06, 14 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
: Someone already has removed my warning. [[User:Techman224|<font color="339933">'''Techman224'''</font>]][[User talk:Techman224|<font color="3300ff">'''<sup>Talk</sup>'''</font>]] 23:00, 14 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Thanks! == |
|||
For blocking the two IPs (socks?) who messed up my user page a couple of times. I appreciate it. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 06:06, 15 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Message on My Page == |
|||
Thanks for the advice on my page. It is noted --[[User:Sikh-history|Sikh-history]] ([[User talk:Sikh-history|talk]]) 08:51, 15 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Block change heads-up == |
|||
Just wanted to let you know that I changed your block time for [[User:Markvision55]] to indefinite, as it turns out it's one of a rash of sockpuppets of [[User:EnglandIslas]]. '''[[User:Akradecki|<font style="color:#62BB32;">AK<font style="color:#006400;">Radecki</font></font>]]'''<sup>[[User_talk:Akradecki|<font style="color:#62BB32;">Speaketh</font>]]</sup> 05:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Java Scriptus == |
|||
I've been reverting edits by [[User:Java Scriptus|Java Scriptus]] because he has seemingly been adding false information. (Please see [[User talk:Download#Stop vandalizing|my talk page]] for what he wrote to me.) I do think he is a threat and his IP should also be blocked, if not already. Thanks for your attention to this issue. <font face="Papyrus" color="#9966CC">-</font>'''[[User:Download#top|<font face="Papyrus" color="#7B68EE">down</font>]][[User talk:Download#top|<font face="Papyrus" color="#9966CC">load</font>]]''' <font face="Papyrus" color="#7B68EE">|</font> '''[[User:Download/Guestbook#top|<font face="Papyrus" color="#8A2BE2">sign!</font>]]''' 00:13, 17 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Vandalism by user:sikh-history == |
|||
Pleasde can you kindly do something about the persistent vandalism on my and other people talkpages. |
|||
user:sikh-history continues to vandalise the talk pages of user:jsu and my own talk page on several occasions and perhaps many more with whom he disagrees with. He suggests I am canvassing! When I am simply '''thanking''' user:jsu for his input to which sikh-hisstory does not seem to like or agree. |
|||
'''I am simply responding''' Now how can this be canvassing, if I am not making an '''initial''' statement, remark or request? He also suggests we are the same user? |
|||
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jsu&diff=prev&oldid=269291241 |
|||
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jsu&diff=prev&oldid=269383918 |
|||
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jsu&diff=prev&oldid=270179329 |
|||
The links above show blatant vandalism of user talk pages of user:jsu, now this user is probably unaware of this vandalism because it has been vandalised so many times by user:sikh-history |
|||
He seems to be a rather audacious character. Please advise him not to vandalise user talk pages and getting away with POV. |
|||
Thank you [[User:Khalsaburg|Khalsaburg]] ([[User talk:Khalsaburg|talk]]) 18:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
: Khalsaburg, please stop being so childish. You have been caught removing ISBN numbers and references that did not concur with your POV. It is not only me that reverted your edits but nearly every editor on the Sikh Wikipedia team, and some others too.--[[User:Sikh-history|Sikh-history]] ([[User talk:Sikh-history|talk]]) 09:04, 20 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Thanks == |
|||
Thanks for the welcome, it is much appreciated. |
|||
I hope I am able to help and contribute in a positive manner! |
|||
[[User:Jargon777|Jargon777]] ([[User talk:Jargon777|talk]]) 02:27, 20 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Re: Your revert to Seven Wonders of the Ancient World == |
|||
Simple mistake with Huggle, my bad. Thanks for notifying me. –[[User:Juliancolton|Juliancolton]] [[User talk:Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''T'''ropical</sup></font>]] [[Special:contributions/Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''C'''yclone</sup></font>]] 16:39, 20 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Please Block == |
|||
Could you please block {{user|Cardsplayer4life}} from making any edits. They are editwarring with me through the edits I was making via my IP address, I am not sure if you actually read the edits that were made, you would see that my edits were actually not vandalism, but were improving the content of the article by clarifying the subject in order to help the article reach a better "point of neutrality" which is one of the core concepts of Wikipedia.[[User:TheTruthLeadsMe|TheTruthLeadsMe]] ([[User talk:TheTruthLeadsMe|talk]]) 20:34, 22 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:For clarity's sake, this editor also appears to be the IP {{user|65.96.67.105}}, who was involved in an edit war at [[NCAA Division I FBS National Football Championship]]. [[User:Dayewalker|Dayewalker]] ([[User talk:Dayewalker|talk]]) 20:50, 22 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::1) Yes that user is the registered version of the IP, and 2) I was one of three people (in addition to BCSPro and NewGuy34) reverting the (latest) edits of the user in that article, which is apparent if [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NCAA_Division_I_FBS_National_Football_Championship&action=history the edit history of the article] is pulled up. [[User:Cardsplayer4life|Cardsplayer4life]] ([[User talk:Cardsplayer4life|talk]]) 21:39, 22 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== 50 largest banks == |
|||
'USAA bank one of largest in world', San Antonio Express-News |
|||
Published 2/24/2009 |
|||
1. We are the 28th largest bank in the nation |
|||
thanks <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/167.24.104.150|167.24.104.150]] ([[User talk:167.24.104.150|talk]]) 17:10, 24 February 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:That could be, however your institution is not on our source list, the [[Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council]]'s quarterly [http://www.ffiec.gov/nicpubweb/nicweb/Top50Form.aspx Top 50 bank holding companies] report. Since {{tl|50 largest US banks}} is 100% [[WP:SOURCE|sourced]] and [[WP:CITE|cited]] to the FFIEC list, we can only include the banks they include. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 17:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Rollback == |
|||
Hi! thanx for considering me for the priveledge. I'll abide by the guidelines & rules regarding rollback and will be happy to get this privelege. --[[User:Faizhaider|Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider Rizvi]] ([[User talk:Faizhaider|talk]]) 05:14, 25 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Thanx.--[[User:Faizhaider|Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider Rizvi]] ([[User talk:Faizhaider|talk]]) 09:08, 27 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Re: Friendly note regarding talk page messages == |
|||
The situation has already been explained and dealt with. In other words, you're a bit late. =/ <i>[[Recca|Elm-39]] - [[User talk:Elm-39#top|T]]/[[User:Elm-39/Notes to self|C]]</i> 19:22, 25 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Thanks for Welcoming me == |
|||
Thank you brother for welcoming me. That was quite nice of you. Peace [[User:Micro360|Micro360]] ([[User talk:Micro360|talk]]) 23:32, 26 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Block Settings == |
|||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&user=&page=User:68.79.1.0 Ooop!] I blocked for three hours as you blocked for 24 and only realised when ec'd by the block message we were both placing on the talk page. I've undone my three hour block back to your 24 (me - I'm a softy :)....) <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Pedro|<b>Pedro</b>]] : [[User_talk:Pedro|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;"> Chat </font>]] </span></small> 23:11, 27 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==User 68.218.209.5== |
|||
Dear Kralizec!, 31 hours for that vitriol? I know its an IP address, and that I suppose that blocks should not be punitive, and should amount to corrective discipline. But that was a level of nonsense that deserved (IMHO) a real sanction, not a slap on the wrist. You have tempered justice with perhaps too much mercy. Hope that all is well with you. Good luck keeping a lid on, and happy editing. [[User:7&6=thirteen|7&6=thirteen]] ([[User talk:7&6=thirteen|talk]]) 19:56, 28 February 2009 (UTC) Stan |
|||
:Thanks for the explanation. I do understand the limited ability to do anything meaningful. But he was just so 'over the top.' Admin apparently has its frustrations, along with the (presumed) rewards. Best regards. [[User:7&6=thirteen|7&6=thirteen]] ([[User talk:7&6=thirteen|talk]]) 22:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC) Stan |
|||
== Vandalism == |
|||
Hey there, thanks for keeping the vandalism by 202.134.149.222 and 86.96.226.16 at bay. I've given a warning to the former and reported him, so I hope it is enough. |
|||
Regards, |
|||
--[[User:Rsrikanth05|Rsrikanth05]] ([[User talk:Rsrikanth05|talk]]) 13:42, 2 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Blocking vandalism IP == |
|||
137.191.233.130 is a vandalism IP. What can we do to prevent further damage? ([[User:Diagear|Diagear]] ([[User talk:Diagear|talk]]) 01:52, 3 March 2009 (UTC)) |
|||
== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009) == |
|||
The '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Outreach/Newsletter February 2009|February 2009 issue]]''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by [[User:BrownBot|BrownBot]] ([[User talk:BrownBot|talk]]) 22:49, 3 March 2009 (UTC)</small> |
|||
== Yes to rollback == |
|||
Most honorable Kralizec!, thanks for your offer of rollback. I will gladly stick to the only-for-obvious-vandalism rule. You will be proud! Regards, [[User:Three-quarter-ten|— ¾-10]] 02:12, 4 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Ann Haydon-Jones]] == |
|||
Not to harp about the "wrong version", but when you protected this page, you protected the version that wasn't supported by consensus. An IP seeks to have the references tag removed even though more editors than him think it belongs there. Also note this IP has been recently blocked for edit-warring. Please look over this again. Thanks, [[User:Themfromspace|Themfromspace]] ([[User talk:Themfromspace|talk]]) 05:21, 4 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==An appeal for JUSTICE== |
|||
Your blocks hvae been very unfair. You block other users who had done nothing wrong. Is it right to block some users and NOT others?? Is that justice????? NO its NOT!! You blocked user 76.16.103.76 who only made TWO edits!!! How can I have broken the 3 revert rule with only 2 edits!!!! Go on ask yorself... Another user Marek69 made 8 edits and IS NOT BLOCKED!! WHY???!!! |
|||
We appeal for JUSTICE on wikipedia or I will go higher... <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:TennisPro2|TennisPro2]] ([[User talk:TennisPro2|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TennisPro2|contribs]]) 20:45, 4 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== Soxbot == |
|||
Can you keep an eye on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:X!/Sox_Commons#bot_gone_wild this bot]? Please tb or comment over there, if you choose to. Thanks. [[User:Tedder|tedder]] ([[User talk:Tedder|talk]]) 05:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==Copied fake block :)== |
|||
[[Image:Information.svg|60px]] Hello Kralizec!. Have you remembered your block of the IP "165.139.22.67"? Well I was bored, and copied the whole page. Editing some of it, I'm not really blocked from editing, I just look like I am. But I can still edit. Would that be something weird to do? XD [[User:Parappa664|<FONT STYLE="italic" COLOR="#ff0000">Pa</FONT><FONT COLOR="#008080">rappa</FONT><FONT COLOR="#ff00cc">664</FONT>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Parappa664|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Parappa664|contribs]]</sup> 12:36, 4 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:It is certainly ... unusual. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 20:03, 4 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:I also did that to the user crowdo, and edited it as well. Do not think we ressult in edit conflicts ; I'm just bored. :) [[User:Parappa664|<FONT STYLE="italic" COLOR="#ff0000">Pa</FONT><FONT COLOR="#008080">rappa</FONT><FONT COLOR="#ff00cc">664</FONT>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Parappa664|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Parappa664|contribs]]</sup> 1:10, 4 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::How about, you know, ''improving'' the encyclopedia? --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 20:51, 4 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Thought you might enjoy this == |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/Kradizec!]] and [[Special:DeletedContributions/Kradizec!]]. Cheers! [[User:J.delanoy|<font color="green">J'''.'''delanoy</font>]][[User Talk:J.delanoy|<sup><font color="red">gabs</font></sup>]][[Special:Contributions/J.delanoy|<font color="blue"><sub>adds</sub></font>]] 21:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Evidence of sockpuppetry == |
|||
Hey, I was responding to an unblock request at [[User talk:RavShimon]]. You blocked him as a sockpuppet of [[User:Klaksonn]] however I don't see any common edits between RavShimon and Klakson in terms of direct textual similarities. Certainly, you have more information that I am not privy to that led you to make your block, but since I do not have access to this information, I cannot respond intelligently to his unblock request. Could you please make a posting on RavShimon's talk page with some diffs to show the obvious [[WP:DUCK|duckworthy]] connection between him and Klaksonn? Without either diffs or a [[WP:SPI]] report to go on, I am having a hard time seeing the connection you saw. Thanks! --[[User:Jayron32|Jayron32]].[[User talk:Jayron32|<small>talk</small>]].[[Special:Contributions/Jayron32|<small>contribs</small>]] 23:00, 4 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Jeanne Boylan]] == |
|||
Greetings. You protected this title after the article was unilaterally redirected without discussion. As Jeanne Boylan is a notable topic, it is completely unacceptable that the article be ''de facto'' deleted without any discussion whatsoever. Please consider lowering the protection, so that the article may be restored. Regards, <font color="404040">[[User:Skomorokh|<font face="Goudy Old Style" color="black">Skomorokh</font>]]</font> 17:27, 5 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Actually I protected the redirect in regards to [[m:OTRS]] [[Ticket:2009030410054823]]. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 17:34, 5 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::That link is no use to me as it requires an OTRS login. To re-iterate, this article was removed out of process, with neither merge discussion or AfD. If you will not lower the protection, please restore the article to the (admin-approved, squeaky-clean) version prior to the redirect [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jeanne_Boylan&oldid=275096068]. Regards, <font color="404040">[[User:Skomorokh|<font face="Goudy Old Style" color="black">Skomorokh</font>]]</font> 17:45, 5 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::The thing is, I do not actually disagree with you here. Normally I would have done exactly what you asked for from the beginning, however BLP concerns coupled with an OTRS ticket means that we must proceed deliberately and with caution. I have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMBisanz&diff=275206199&oldid=275171529 contacted] another admin who has OTRS access and asked him to review both the ticket and the protection of the redirect. If he determines that the vetted version of the article is fine and does not risk any BLP or litigation issues, I will be glad to un-protect and revert the redirect. However until then, I am going to refrain from poking the proverbial litigious tiger in the eye. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 18:03, 5 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::::That seems reasonable; I can stomach covering the foundation's ass a lot more than tearing down articles on worthy topics out of BLP paranoia. I appreciate your time, and will revisit the issue in a week or so. Regards, <font color="404040">[[User:Skomorokh|<font face="Goudy Old Style" color="black">Skomorokh</font>]]</font> 18:09, 5 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::::It appears that we have our answer: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMBisanz&diff=275254866&oldid=275206199]. I have no idea why (other than the implied legal reasons) as I do not have OTRS access, however I ''do'' have a great deal of faith in both Matt's judgment and his ability to accurately assess the facts on the ground. Unfortunately I do not think there is anything else I can do to help at this point. Additional information on the OTRS process (and how to request a review of OTRS-based decisions) can be found on Meta at [[:m:OTRS]]. However as the Wiki [[WP:OTRS|OTRS page]] notes, "the confidential nature of [the emails used to create OTRS tickets] makes normal wiki-based dispute resolution processes difficult, and often impracticable in many cases." Sorry I could not be of more help. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 01:37, 6 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== IP adress == |
|||
This IP adress http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Komondor&diff=275235311&oldid=275234685 has been warned but continues to edit war without discussing any changes and constantly removing relevant information without discussion that needs to be inserted again, several days now. [[User:Warrington|Warrington]] ([[User talk:Warrington|talk]]) 20:33, 5 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Thank you for your message on my talk page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKralizec%21&diff=275239620&oldid=275211733]. My suggestion would be for you to try engaging the editor with a personal message on his or her talk page. Specifically you could invite the IP to join the discussion on the [[Talk:Komondor|article's talk page]] so that everyone can work collaboratively toward [[WP:CON|consensus]]. Considering the edits in question, if you were to report the IP to AIV, a block request would probably be declined with a {{AIV|c}}. Good luck! --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 21:17, 5 March 2009 (UTC) ''(original reply [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AWarrington&diff=275249975&oldid=275248811] copied from [[User talk:Warrington]])'' |
|||
Still edit waring, now with an account. Now is this editing? )[[Komondor]] dog reed): |
|||
IMPORTANT PROPORTIONS |
|||
• The body length sligthly exceeds the height at the withers. |
|||
• The deepest point of the brisket is approximately on a level with half of the height at the withers. |
|||
• The muzzle is slightly shorter than half of the length of the head. |
|||
HEIGHT AT WITHERS |
|||
Males: Minimum 70 cm. |
|||
Females: Minimum 65 cm. |
|||
WEIGHT |
|||
Males: 50 – 60 kg. |
|||
Females: 40 – 50 kg. |
|||
The breed shows few faults in type and is largely uniform as it has always been bred with the same target.[2] |
|||
I go and paint myself pink.... |
|||
[[User:Warrington|Warrington]] ([[User talk:Warrington|talk]]) 00:05, 6 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Email == |
|||
You have some. '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 00:19, 6 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Ay Ziggy Zoomba == |
|||
Yes, that's me. -- [[User:JeffBillman|JeffBillman]] ([[User talk:JeffBillman|talk]]) 01:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User:AngelaSchmidt]] == |
|||
Many thanks for blocking this user! It was a pain fixing their re-directs. [[User:CarpetCrawler|CarpetCrawler]] ([[User talk:CarpetCrawler|talk]]) 05:23, 7 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Sometimes I feel that only established users should be allowed to re-direct articles. Have a nice day! [[User:CarpetCrawler|CarpetCrawler]] ([[User talk:CarpetCrawler|talk]]) 05:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:: |
|||
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |
|||
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | [[Image:Barnstar of Humour3.png|100px]] |
|||
|rowspan="2" | |
|||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Good Humor''' |
|||
|- |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For giving me a funny talk page response (Considering the circumstances, should it be the Barnstar of Goood Humor?) What was with that user's obession with the double O, anyway? Have a goood day. ;) [[User:CarpetCrawler|CarpetCrawler]] ([[User talk:CarpetCrawler|talk]]) 05:40, 7 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
|} And the moves look fine so far. ;) I'm of course the master of the typo, so I guess I might not be the best person to ask though... ;) [[User:CarpetCrawler|CarpetCrawler]] ([[User talk:CarpetCrawler|talk]]) 05:40, 7 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:The page moves look good to me. -'''[[User:MBK004|MBK]]'''<sub>[[User talk:MBK004|004]]</sub> 05:44, 7 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::Ohhh yes, this is why I focus mainly on adding content to Wikipedia, not fixing what other people do. I'd screw up so much! Don't worry, it happens to everyone! :) Even established admins! ;) No problemo on the barnstar, the message gave me a good laugh! Have a nice day! :) [[User:CarpetCrawler|CarpetCrawler]] ([[User talk:CarpetCrawler|talk]]) 05:56, 7 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Block on User:220.253.179.130 for disruptive editing == |
|||
Please re-check the circumstances of this matter. You will see that I made 5 edits immediately prior to your block: |
|||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bingo-101a&diff=prev&oldid=275551978] removed copyright material from a user page |
|||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bingo-101a&diff=prev&oldid=275552308] removed further copyright material from the same page |
|||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bingo-101a&diff=prev&oldid=275557645] added copyvio tags to the user page |
|||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2009_March_7&diff=prev&oldid=275557858] added advice to the Copyright Problems page |
|||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bingo-101a&diff=prev&oldid=275558101] advised the user of the tagging. |
|||
Please advise which of these steps you consider to be "disruptive editing"? They all seem to comply with Wikipedia guidelines. Thanks, [[Special:Contributions/220.253.65.80|220.253.65.80]] ([[User talk:220.253.65.80|talk]]) 07:00, 7 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:I've unblocked the user with the evidence he provided. I don't see any acts of "vandalism" here; he was merely upholding Wikipedia's copyright policies. —[[User:DarkFalls|Dark]] <sup>[[User talk:DarkFalls|talk]]</sup> 10:46, 7 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::A detailed response is located at [[User talk:Bingo-101a]]. —[[User:DarkFalls|Dark]] <sup>[[User talk:DarkFalls|talk]]</sup> 11:19, 7 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==IP editor== |
|||
{{userlinks|86.25.182.176}} is not a vandal. They were removing disputed content, are participating in talk page discussion, and all that happened was ignorant editors constantly reverted and accused them of vandalism. Please consider unblocking this editor. Thank you. [[User:O Fenian|O Fenian]] ([[User talk:O Fenian|talk]]) 18:44, 7 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== RE:Thanks! == |
|||
:Your welcome mate. Happy editing! [[::User:Police,Mad,Jack|Police,Mad,Jack]] ([[::User talk:Police,Mad,Jack|talk]] '''·''' [[::Special:Contributions/Police,Mad,Jack|contribs]])<font size="4">☺</font> 18:45, 7 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==Sam's Club== |
|||
My apologies for the delay in my response, I got really busy recently. Please explain in detail why you blocked me yet not the other editors who were disputing the article. [[User:Elpablo69|Elpablo69]] ([[User talk:Elpablo69|talk]]) 07:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Shshsh unblock request == |
|||
It, too, was declined by someone else for the same reasons I would have given. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 16:58, 8 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== 2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict- Thank you. == |
|||
--[[User:Bob K31416|Bob K31416]] ([[User talk:Bob K31416|talk]]) 18:04, 8 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election == |
|||
The [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators|Military history WikiProject coordinator]] selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators/March 2009|here]] by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by [[User:BrownBot|BrownBot]] ([[User talk:BrownBot|talk]]) 19:26, 8 March 2009 (UTC)</small> |
|||
== re: Protection for Erik Möller == |
|||
Ah, I see they are from the same IP - I had noticed four instances of disruption all within the last 24 hours. No worries, '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 06:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== IIPM nonsense == |
|||
Regarding your protection of [[The Indian Institute of Planning and Management]], see also |
|||
[[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mrinal Pandey]]. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 19:41, 9 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Frank Turner == |
|||
Hi, you have locked this article, with the vandalism still included. (The person committing the vandalism managed a swift re-edit before just before you locked it). Thanks for the lock though! <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:David2206|David2206]] ([[User talk:David2206|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/David2206|contribs]]) 23:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Hi. |
|||
The vanadlism here comes from the content being removed by Dave, who I also beileve is the same person who has been harrasing members of the Frank Turner message board community. Please re-instate the statement regarding Million Dead break-up. Thank you. [[User:Jontyjoesph|Jontyjoesph]] ([[User talk:Jontyjoesph|talk]]) 00:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Aaaarrghhh. Sorry about all of this Kralizec. If you look through the history of the page (and the content when it was last locked due to the same style of vandalism) you will be able to see what is the vandalism, and what is not. Once again, sorry about all this.[[User:David2206|David2206]] ([[User talk:David2206|talk]]) 00:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Also, if you look through David's own talk page you will see he has a history of trying to disrupt pages when he decided to "blank" his own talk page with a false stop. [[User:Jontyjoesph|Jontyjoesph]] ([[User talk:Jontyjoesph|talk]]) 00:13, 10 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Yes, and I have received the warning for that (as a new user I did not know it was not allowed for my own talk page). You recently performed the same action on the Frank Turner talk page, deleting my comments on the validity of claims regarding Frank Turner's involvement in the Million Dead break-up. Anyway, this is immature, and it is too late, and doesn't concern Kralizec. What matters is that the Frank Turner page has been reverted to its un-vandalized state.[[User:David2206|David2206]] ([[User talk:David2206|talk]]) 00:21, 10 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
...except it's *NOT* in an un-vandlised state, is it? You know full well that allmost every member of Million Dead has stated in public interviews that they blame Frank Turner for the break-up. [[User:Jontyjoesph|Jontyjoesph]] ([[User talk:Jontyjoesph|talk]]) 00:38, 10 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [[West Memphis 3]] / Detroitwheel == |
|||
Hey, you previously blocked {{user|Detroitwheel}} for his edits on [[West Memphis 3]]. Looks like he's continuing in the same path, removing sourced (though probably not as sourced as it should be) content and adding what at the very least looks like unencyclopedic content ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=West_Memphis_3&diff=275655587&oldid=275598221 diff]). I get the impression he's POV-pushing (edits like changing "''In 2007, DNA collected from the crime scene was tested. None was found to match DNA from Echols, Baldwin, Misskelley nor John Mark Byers''" to the unsourced "''In 2005, DNA collected from the crime scene was tested an foreign alleles found on the bindings on Steve Branch, and a penile swab from Micheal Moore were consistent with DNA samples from Echols and Misskelley''", and completly removing the section on "Mr. Bojangles"), but I'm not completly sure what his goals are. The article really needs some work, but to be honest I'm not really interested in it besides keeping it "clean" and the revision before Detroitwheel's most recent edits seems OK after I removed some unsourced content. Sorry to bother you about this, but I feel someone should do something about Detroitwheel. Cheers, --[[User:aktsu|<font color="black"><b>aktsu</b></font>]] <sup>([[User talk:aktsu|t]] / [[Special:Contributions/Aktsu|c]])</sup> 09:51, 10 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Thanks for at least semi-protecting it, but it's not really dealing with the issue as Detroitwheel is auto-confirmed and he just did his usual edits to the article. If you don't want to deal with it (understandable), where would be the most appropriate place to bring it up? WP:BLPN? Thanks, --[[User:aktsu|<font color="black"><b>aktsu</b></font>]] <sup>([[User talk:aktsu|t]] / [[Special:Contributions/Aktsu|c]])</sup> 20:09, 12 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [[P = NP problem]] == |
|||
<s>Hello. Thanks for protecting [[P = NP problem]]; hope the crazy vandal goes away. You've also protected it against being moved, though, but there seems to be no disagreement on the talk page against moving it to the more common name [[P versus NP problem]], the more common name in the literature (e.g. as used by the [[Millennium Prize Problems]] at [http://www.claymath.org/millennium/P_vs_NP/], or by [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PVersusNPProblem.html Mathworld], etc.) or even simply because we don't believe P=NP. Could this be moved? Thanks, [[User:Shreevatsa|Shreevatsa]] ([[User talk:Shreevatsa|talk]]) 15:01, 14 March 2009 (UTC)</s> |
|||
: Hi, it seems there isn't actually consensus for the move, so you can ignore the above comment of mine (and this one). Regards, [[User:Shreevatsa|Shreevatsa]] ([[User talk:Shreevatsa|talk]]) 23:19, 18 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Vandalism on Square Root Day page == |
|||
Hello |
|||
This morning, having seen the protection on this page has been removed, I made an edit removing some irrelevant material. Not two hours later someone added the 10/10/100 date again, even with the interdiction by Finell. If I am reading this page right, you placed the vandalism protection on the page earlier. Perhaps it's time to do so again. It looks like someone is obsessed with putting that date on the page and will not stop. |
|||
Thank you! |
|||
[[User:Journeybear|Journeybear]] ([[User talk:Journeybear|talk]]) 17:01, 14 March 2009 (UTC)JB |
|||
== Thanks for the lengthy block == |
|||
of [[Special:Contributions/125.168.97.158]]. [[User_talk:125.168.97.158#March_2009|This]] makes me chuckle. [[User:Enigmaman|'''<font color="blue">Enigma</font>''']]<sup>[[User talk:Enigmaman|''<font color="#FFA500">msg</font>'']]</sup> 05:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Vandalism in Rock of Love Bus with Bret Michaels == |
|||
Hello, Krazilec! I too have noticed the vandalism in the call out order of rock of love 3. I did my best to help bring it back to the way it was. One thing of note is that I felt it was important to turn Ashley's elimination light blue in episode 9 (Exes and Ohs) as hers was not a standard elimination. If you watch the episode, you will notice that Bret was all ready to give Ashley the pass but asked the key question that revealed how she truly felt about her ex boyfriend in Las Vegas. Because of her hesitation to answer we all knew she wasn't ready to move on and be there for Bret and it was only then Bret decided to end her tour there. Her own inability to answer and move on from her ex qualifies as a voluntary withdrawal, not a standard elimination. [[User:Kimmymarie24|Kimmymarie24]] ([[User talk:Kimmymarie24|talk]]) 05:29, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Kimmymarie24 |
|||
:Sorry, I have no clue what you are talking about because I do not watch reality television. The article was protected as per a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_page_protection&diff=277803468&oldid=277802249 request] at [[WP:RFPP|Requests for page protection]]. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 05:39, 17 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
That's ok. I felt it was important to point this out because the way this episode ended for Ashley is strikingly similar to Episode 6 of For The Love Of Ray J entitled "Bad Girls, Bad Girls Whatcha Gonna Do?" in which the wine glass was available to Cashmere at the end, but her own hesitation to take it because she had second thoughts about the pressure around the other girls (and Ray J was not about to pick it up and offer it to her but there it was) earned Cashmere's elimination a dark purple voluntary withdrawal color on the For The Love of Ray J page. VH1 is fun...give it a try! [[User:Kimmymarie24|Kimmymarie24]] ([[User talk:Kimmymarie24|talk]]) 06:22, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Kimmymarie24 |
|||
==Kazakhstan article== |
|||
Hello. The user [[User:Debresser|Debresser]] removed the protection from the [[Kazakhstan]] article. It almost immediately started getting vandalized again. I don't believe it was supposed to be removed, and I'm not sure if I can re-add it or if only an admin can do that. Can you take a quick look? Thanks. [[User:Otebig|Otebig]] ([[User talk:Otebig|talk]]) 14:27, 18 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Thank you for your message on my talk page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKralizec%21&diff=278109431&oldid=277812742]. The removal of the {{tl|pp-vandalism}} template by {{user|Debresser}} is perfectly fine as the article's protection expired on the 15th. As the article's edit history shows[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kazakhstan&diff=275874533&oldid=275856918], my semi-protection of the article was just for seven days. While the article has been edited several times since this protection ended, I only count three reverts (including my own just now) in the past three days, which is not sufficiently high enough to justify protection on a high profile article like this one. Please let me know if you have any other questions or issues. Thanks, [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 21:56, 18 March 2009 (UTC) ''(original reply [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AOtebig&diff=278203281&oldid=274448020] copied from [[User talk:Otebig]])'' |
|||
== Military history WikiProject coordinator election == |
|||
The [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators|Military history WikiProject coordinator]] election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators/March 2009|vote here]] by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by [[User:BrownBot|BrownBot]] ([[User talk:BrownBot|talk]]) 01:26, 21 March 2009 (UTC)</small> |
|||
== Hello == |
|||
Just wanted to say awesome work you do here keep it up. Cheers [[User:Kyle1278|Kyle1278]] ([[User talk:Kyle1278|talk]]) 06:09, 21 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Administrator intervention against vandalism == |
|||
Hello. Please be careful when making edits to [[WP:AIV]], as it appears that you accidentally removed one of my administrator's comment [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=278871981&oldid=278871968]. Thanks — [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 03:35, 22 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Since I started using Huggle about four months ago, I haven't made a manual edit to [[WP:AIV]]. This is not the first time that a Huggle edit overlaid an AIV edit, and I will bring this to the attention of Huggle's developers. [[User:Alansohn|Alansohn]] ([[User talk:Alansohn|talk]]) 04:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Userfy/Sig == |
|||
Hi, this page [[User:Equazcion/Zeitgeist: Addendum]] was deleted when the user retired, but was partially userfied at [[User:MichaelQSchmidt/Zeitgeist: Addendum]]. I was wondering if you could userfy the talk page to [[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt/Zeitgeist: Addendum]]. |
|||
Also, what's the code you put in the raw signature box so that if you sign on your own talk page it says '''(talk)''' instaed of a link? Many Thannks --[[User:DFS454|DFS454]] ([[User talk:DFS454|talk]]) 18:37, 22 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Military history Coordinator Elections == |
|||
As a member of the WikiProject who is running for coordinator it is so go great to see people getting involved. It seems that some people truly care about the future of the WikiProject Keep Up the Good work. Have A Great Day! [[User:Lordoliver|<font color="tan">'''Lord ''Oliver'' '''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Lordoliver|<font color="green">The <font color="black"> ''Olive''</font> Branch</font>]]</sup> 19:11, 22 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==66.76.200.2== |
|||
Why am I being told to "wait" on a AIV post? The vandalism took place within the hour, so it isn't stale. The user has been given 5 warnings in the past hour as well. A block should be in place not "let's wait and see if he vandals some more pages". - <small style="border:1px solid #990000;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#990000;background:#FFFFFF;">NeutralHomer</font>]] • [[User_talk:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#000000;background:#FFFFFF;">Talk</font>]] • March 22, 2009 @ 21:36</small> |
|||
:Because blocks are preventative, not punitive and the editor has indicated that the problems have halted. It seems to be sincere, but we'll see. [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 22:22, 22 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::I'm pretty sure that's not vandalism, either. [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 22:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::How is blantantly removing information from a page not vandalism? - <small style="border:1px solid #990000;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#990000;background:#FFFFFF;">NeutralHomer</font>]] • [[User_talk:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#000000;background:#FFFFFF;">Talk</font>]] • March 23, 2009 @ 03:31</small> |
|||
::::Apoligies in advance to Kralizec!. Please direct any replies to my talk page. |
|||
::::I saw edits like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WVVA&diff=prev&oldid=279016727 this] that would be tough to say were deliberate attempts to compromise Wikipedia - especially after the editor's comments about holding up since s/he was contacting a RTN representative. I'm not known for shying away from blocking folks (probably the contrary), but I'd have a tough time defending a block there if it were challenged. [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 04:45, 23 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
''Toddst1'' pretty much summed it all up for me: as per [[WP:BLOCK]], the purpose of blocking is prevention, not punishment. In light of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANeutralhomer&diff=279018087&oldid=278858454 IP's commitment to stop], any block I levied now would be punishment. However if this anonymous editor breaks his or her word and continues removing content, then a block would be entirely appropriate as to prevent further disruption of the project. — [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 12:11, 23 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:While I don't agree with it, I will respect it and keep an extremely close eye on the [[WVVA]] article (the one the user seems to vandalize more than anything) and the users contribs, but I wouldn't be surprised if the user doesn't switch IPs between now and then. - <small style="border:1px solid #990000;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#990000;background:#FFFFFF;">NeutralHomer</font>]] • [[User_talk:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#000000;background:#FFFFFF;">Talk</font>]] • March 23, 2009 @ 12:19</small> |
|||
::Fair enough. However, even if our anonymous friend switches to another IP, please let me know (especially if you have diffs showing different IPs making the same edits), as I would be more than happy to [[WP:SEMI|semi-protect]] the article. Thanks, — [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 12:22, 23 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::If the user jumps IPs, I might have you do that....and trust me, I have plenty of diffs :) Take Care...<small style="border:1px solid #990000;padding:1px;">[[User:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#990000;background:#FFFFFF;">NeutralHomer</font>]] • [[User_talk:Neutralhomer|<font style="color:#000000;background:#FFFFFF;">Talk</font>]] • March 23, 2009 @ 12:26</small> |
|||
==[[User: 114.77.199.50]]== |
|||
This user was temporarily blocked by you, but now that the block is off he has now returned to harass me on my talk page. Can you do anything? [[User:J Bar|J Bar]] ([[User talk:J Bar|talk]]) 22:15, 22 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Not until the IP makes a more substantive threat than to leave you alone [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJ_Bar&diff=278921701&oldid=276735972]. However if you can provide [[WP:DIFF|diffs]] showing that this is the same pattern previously used to harass you (or that "leave you alone" is how he/she begins a new wave of abuse), then I could block based on that. Thanks, — [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 12:19, 23 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==[[User: Journalist1983]]== |
|||
After an admin reverted the same thing that I reverted, he told me "since removing referenced content is considered vandalism then you are permitted to revert them without penalty." [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:LessHeard_vanU]] Why are you warning me, then? This article was written by what seems to be a PR corporate shill, and he is doing everything in his power to block something which might portray any of his subjects in an unfavorable light --[[User:Nacl11|Nacl11]] ([[User talk:Nacl11|talk]]) 15:49, 23 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Aegis or not, this guy obviously has some sort of self-interest in this article. It is blatant and obvious. LessHeard vanU recognized this. I wish you would also. This editor has used socks to try and get around the 3rr rule and an admin edit. He's written a glowing fluff piece about someone who got caught with their hands in the cookie jar in a very public way. Look at some of the editors other articles. They all take on a similar tone and fairly reek of being the work of a public relations intern. They are mostly about little known business executives and former politicians. (btw, the New York Times Caucus blog has been recognized as a reputable source before). But if a situation which is so obvious on its face is re-cast by you as something about editing technicalities (and your an admin for crying out loud), directly contradicting another admin, I don't really have much hope for this contribution. Thanks. --[[User:Nacl11|Nacl11]] ([[User talk:Nacl11|talk]]) 16:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::So is there any reason you would like to articulate for the block or was it just a general show of force? Please correct me if I am misunderstanding, but the 3RR rule expressly refers to three reverts in a 24-hour period. Since this was clearly not the case, is there a different reason you blocked me? I attempted to defend the cited content that I added to the article on the article's talk page as you suggested, but the other editor kept deleting the cited content. Please explain. --[[User:Nacl11|Nacl11]] ([[User talk:Nacl11|talk]]) 18:56, 27 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Special:Contributions/93.97.167.197|93.97.167.197]] == |
|||
Whew, thanks a million for that block, [[Special:Contributions/Spitfire|my head was starting to spin]] [[User:Spitfire|Spitfire]]<sup>[[User talk:Spitfire|Tally-ho!]]</sup> 19:56, 25 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [[User talk:Manwithvan]] == |
|||
Could you please explain your rationale for blocking User:Manwithvan? I could only find one warning on his talk page. I do not believe that due process was exercised here. [[User:ErikTheBikeMan|ErikTheBikeMan]] ([[User talk:ErikTheBikeMan|talk]]) 21:09, 25 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:{{userblock|Manwithvan}} was reported to [[WP:AIV]] as being a "vandalism only account." However I declined to block indefinitely because the user had not been warned sufficiently, so instead I blocked for 31 hours [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AManwithvan&diff=279135806&oldid=279130724]. The block was based on the inappropriate creation of four articles failing [[WP:NN]] and [[WP:BLP]]. I see that since the block expired, this user has created [[Emily Ambrose]] ("most famous for her awesome tennis skills at the well renowned earls colne") and [[Rebecca Drakeford]] ("likes a drink on a firday and is a bit of an alci"), as well as the prod'ed [[Pyronecrophyliac]]. — [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 21:48, 25 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Regarding Vampire: The Masquerade – Bloodlines == |
|||
I just noticed you protected [[Vampire: The Masquerade – Bloodlines]]. I also see that the protection was requested by [[User:VitasV]]. |
|||
I monitor this page, and do not feel as thought he edits Vitas is complaining about were vandalism. As near as I can tell they were actually anonymous edits by a registered user who appears to have simply not logged in. On the article's talk page, you'll see a comment from [[Special:Contributions/Wesp5|Wesp5]] who asks that people stop changing his edits. I'm pretty sure the IP edits in question were his. |
|||
The edits in question looked to me like valid content, rearranging a section of the article discussing patches to the game. |
|||
Further, Vitas said in his PP request that an IP editor had removed portions of the talk page. I don't see any such edits in the history of the page in question. -[[User:FeralDruid|FeralDruid]] ([[User talk:FeralDruid|talk]]) 06:46, 26 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==Oklahoma City bombing== |
|||
Hello, I have spent the last few days cleaning up the citations, adding more sources, removing multiple unreliable sources, and moving information around for the article. I have definitely learned a lot since first working on this article to get it to GA. I would like to get this to FA in time for the 15th anniversary to be featured on the main page. First, I want to commence an A-class review with WikiProject:Oklahoma, and since you are a member, I was wondering if you knew of how A-class reviews are handled by the project. I didn't see a nomination page (such as [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Films/Review#A-Class_review|WP:FILMS A-class page]]). Would you be able to copyedit the article and help me set up an A-class review with the members of the project? I want to get rid of errors/inconsistencies/formatting issues before heading on to FA. Thanks for helping to maintain the article, and hopefully it can be improved further. Happy editing! --[[User:Nehrams2020|Nehrams2020]] ([[User talk:Nehrams2020|talk]]) 07:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:I totally understand. I'm currently job searching right now, and I think once I'm employed I'll be running out of time here on the many projects I have. Would you still be able to give it a look-over? I never catch my own mistakes, and it would benefit from another set of eyes ensuring everything makes sense. I guess I'll just open up an A-class review on the talk page and then leave a message at the project's main talk page. I'm also not an expert on FA, only having completed one (as well as one FL with one in FLC right now). I had wanted this article to be my first FA, but I didn't really know how the process works and there was continual reverting/editing related to the conspiracy theories section. Fortunately I found some reliable sources for that section finally, and if the article is deemed too long, perhaps that can finally be split off. So I'll take this one step at a time, and hopefully I can reach the goal of getting it featured. Happy editing! --[[User:Nehrams2020|Nehrams2020]] ([[User talk:Nehrams2020|talk]]) 19:47, 27 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Thanks from Arapaima for "Aerial view of Ranger Uranium mine" == |
|||
which betters a lot my article about ''Fr''[[Donald Thomson]]. May I use it again in my future article about "Shibumi", a 1980 book by [[Trevanian]] who tells of the struggle between a man ( a modern samurai) - and a secret organization trying to monopolize the world ressources ? I have quite finished Fr[[Shibumi]] & am completing the En article . The caption would run :"Kakadu uranium mine (Northen Territories, Australia). This kind of mine-stripping used to shock Nicholaï Hel" ''Merci d'avance, bonne continuation'' [[User:Arapaima|Arapaima]] ([[User talk:Arapaima|talk]]) 08:09, 27 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==Block== |
|||
So is there any reason you would like to articulate for the block or was it just a general show of force? Please correct me if I am misunderstanding, but the 3RR rule expressly refers to three reverts in a 24-hour period. Since this clearly was not the case, is there a different reason you blocked me? I attempted to defend the cited content that I added to the article on the article's talk page as you suggested, but the other editor kept deleting the cited content. Please help. --[[User:Nacl11|Nacl11]] ([[User talk:Nacl11|talk]]) 18:56, 27 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Thank you == |
|||
{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|navy}}}; background-color: {{{color|lightsteelblue}}};" |
|||
| rowspan=3 align=center | [[File:German submarine stranded 1921.jpg|160x160px]] |
|||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | <font color="navy"><br>'''I seem to have drawn a crowd of support!'''<br> </font> |
|||
|- |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | <br>I'm honored to have been elected as a coordinator of the [[WP:MILHIST|WikiProject Military history]] and most sincerely thank you for your vote of support. I will endeavor to fulfill the obligations in a manner worthy of your trust. Many thanks. — [[User:Bellhalla|Bellhalla]] ([[User talk:Bellhalla|talk]]) 14:32, 30 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
|- |
|||
| <font color="gray"><small>A World War I U-boat draws a crowd after grounding on the Falmouth coast in 1921.</small></font> |
|||
|} |
|||
== Please Unblock The Indian Institute of Planning and Management == |
|||
Quite clearly, the page should be unlocked as soon as possible for more comments and new editors should be allowed to edit. I find semi-locks strangely and biasedly enforced on this page. It would have been quite easy to block vandals using an approach that I find Wiki administrators using on other pages where: |
|||
1. Administrators could block IP addresses of vandals |
|||
2. In case vandals use multiple IPs, administrators could use the facility to block IP ranges, which I believe they have. |
|||
3. Block user ids of vandals and proxy ids too. |
|||
Though I do appreciate that there has been a temporary semi-protect placed some time back, I believe this is a good time to remove it as (and I quote from Wiki policy), "Page protection should not be used solely to prevent editing by anonymous and newly registered users. In particular, it should not be used to settle content disputes." And I hope that this is not the case currently going on with this page as I find it strange that editors who have registered beyond three months are still not allowed to edit. I request administrators to kindly remove the edit lock. |
|||
Sincerely, |
|||
[[User:Dean.A.Sandeep|Dean.A.Sandeep]] ([[User talk:Dean.A.Sandeep|talk]]) 11:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:{{RFPP|d}} as the article has a long history of issues. — [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 22:39, 31 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== April Fools == |
|||
<--commenting out {top icon |
|||
| imagename = Toiletpapier (Gobran111).jpg |
|||
| wikilink = April Fools' Day |
|||
| description = Toilet Paper for the Port-a-Potty. |
|||
| id = |
|||
|width=42 |
|||
| icon_nr = 0 |
|||
|extra_offset=0}--> |
|||
{| style="border: 1px solid black; background-color: #FFFFF0;font-family:font-family: Trebuchet MS" |
|||
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | [[File:Portapotty3000ppx.JPG|125px]] |
|||
|rowspan="2" | |
|||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |Port-a-Potty!!! |
|||
|- |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;font-family:trebuchet ms;sans-serif" | [[User:DFS454|DFS454]] ([[User talk:DFS454|talk]]) has given you a [[Portable toilet|Port-a-potty]]!!! Now whatever are you going to do!? Happy April Fools Day!!!! |
|||
<small>''Give others port-a-potties by adding <nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Wikipedia:Template substitution|subst:]]User:Fastily/Portapotty<nowiki>}}</nowiki> to their talk page with, importantly, a friendly message.''</small></font> |
|||
|} |
|||
== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009) == |
|||
The '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/News/Newsletter March 2009|March 2009 issue]]''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by [[User:BrownBot|BrownBot]] ([[User talk:BrownBot|talk]]) 03:03, 3 April 2009 (UTC)</small> |
|||
==Fantasy Ride== |
|||
Thank you for protecting [[Fantasy Ride]] for a while. The level of vandalism was getting to a shocking level. ([[User:Lil-unique1|Lil-unique1]] ([[User talk:Lil-unique1|talk]]) 15:26, 3 April 2009 (UTC)) |
|||
== Re: Quite the fan == |
|||
Indeed, did you notice his [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATgyvb&diff=281619538&oldid=281617793 edits] post block which caused me to protect the user talk page? -'''[[User:MBK004|MBK]]'''<sub>[[User talk:MBK004|004]]</sub> 18:42, 4 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== 64.107.220.166 == |
|||
The IP was being used by a cross-wiki password reset vandal. I was just running a check in response to a CheckUser-I thread regarding an unnamed vandal, so I'm not sure if this involves Qwertgb. <span style="background:white;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] </span><sub>([[User talk:Nishkid64|Make articles, not wikidrama]])</sub> 18:55, 4 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== User Shannon Rose == |
|||
I'd like to thank you for stepping in regards to the user Shannon Rose, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Shannon_Rose&action=edit&redlink=1]. I noticed that he/she removed the temp. block notice with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AShannon_Rose&diff=281740143&oldid=281733039], and another user commented that notices like this should be kept (the edit was since reverted). I'm not really familiar with policies regarding this, so I thought I'd bring it to your attention, just in case. Regards, [[User:Spring12|Spring12]] ([[User talk:Spring12|talk]]) 20:41, 4 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Shannon Rose's page was protected, but according to this edit (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FSheree_Silver_(2nd_nomination)&diff=281769543&oldid=281767429) he/she contacted another user to provide a link to the comments made ''after'' being blocked (regarding an AFD discussion). The user (Chillum) that protected Shannon's talk page said I should notify you on direction. Should I respond or try to ignore it? Thanks again, [[User:Spring12|Spring12]] ([[User talk:Spring12|talk]]) 21:16, 4 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [[WP:RFPP]] == |
|||
Could you please clarify exactly why you immediately contradicted the close I made on [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#America.27s_Next_Top_Model.2C_Cycle_12_.28edit.7Ctalk.7Chistory.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29_2|the first America's Top Model]] request on this [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#America.27s_Next_Top_Model.2C_Cycle_12_.28edit.7Ctalk.7Chistory.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29|second one]] in response to one IP vandalizing? Without at least letting me know? One IP editor is not enough for semi protection. [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 02:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Because three different contributors to the article had their edits reverted in the past day? By my book, that is good enough for a 24-hour semi. My apologies if you felt I was stepping on your toes; I was looking for un-processed requests, and was not aware that the previous declined protection request had been made just 72 minutes prior. — [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 03:00, 6 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::72 minutes prior and only 3 requests below... That is very light vandalism, mind that you are blocking a lot of people from editing that article. [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 03:10, 6 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== ANTM Cycle 12 protection == |
|||
Could you please adjust protection settings of [[America's Next Top Model, Cycle 12]] for two months? It is a two-month fashion-themed reality show airing in the United States and the finale will be in mid-May. [[User:ApprenticeFan|<font color="crimson">'''ApprenticeFan'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:ApprenticeFan|<font color="mediumpurple">''talk''</font>]] [[:Special:Contributions/ApprenticeFan|<font color="darkviolet">'''''contribs'''''</font>]]</sup> 02:48, 6 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:One editor is not a high level of vandalism. [[User:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">''Prodego''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Prodego|<font color="darkgreen">talk</font>]]</sup> 02:51, 6 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::While the edits of three different users have been reverted in the past day, that is not enough activity to warrant any more than a 24 hour protection ''at most''. The IP from the latest set of edits has already been blocked (coincidentally by me, when I was processing [[WP:AIV]] reports before coming to [[WP:RFPP]]). If there is a problem again when the 24 protection expires, we can try a 36 or 48 hour protection. Skipping straight to a two month protection is out of the question. Sorry, — [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 03:08, 6 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Re: Chicago Film Producers Alliance == |
|||
I am E. Joyce Moore the owner of the page you are planning to remove. I am a member of this organization and have the responsibility of creating a page in your website. As you can see the document has some pieces that are similar but the document clearly is not the same as the original. I have added significant third party resources to address your concerns. Please advise. Thanks <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Guvnur|Guvnur]] ([[User talk:Guvnur|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Guvnur|contribs]]) 11:08, 8 April 2009</span><!-- Template:Unsigned2 --> |
|||
:Hello Joyce. Thank you for the message you left on my talk page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKralizec%21&diff=282576154&oldid=282024424]. In regards to your statement there, the actual "owner" of the page in question would be the [[Wikimedia Foundation]], as they own the hardware and software that Wikipedia is hosted on. As a guest on their web site, we are all obligated to follow their rules of conduct here. Specifically, the CFPA article does not assert its [[WP:NOT|notability]] via [[WP:RS|reliable, third-party, published sources]], as in accordance with [[WP:GROUP|requirements for organizations and companies]]. The existing article is essentially the same as the previously deleted [[CFPA chicago]] article, which was itself a repost of the original article that was deleted as per [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicago Film Producers Alliance]]. I hope you have a more enjoyable Wikipedia experience than your predecessor Andrew (who had issues trying to follow our rules). Please feel free to let me know if you have any other questions or issues. Thanks, — [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 16:35, 8 April 2009 (UTC) ''(original reply [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGuvnur&diff=282580926&oldid=282577563] copied from [[User talk:Guvnur]])'' |
|||
I would appreciate your assistance. I am E. Joyce Moore, a writer and a member of the Chicago Film Producers Alliance. I have a new role as public relations for the organization and as a part of that, wanted to pursue the inclusion of our organization in Wikipedia. While some of the material in the article is similar to the original, it is definitely not the same and addresses your initial concern and I quote: The result was delete without bias as the article does not establish notability as per WP:GROUP. Kralizec! (talk) 06:44, 5 January 2009 (UTC) I have corrected the article accordingly and welcome you to advise me of any other concerns you may have. |
|||
Kind regards, E. Joyce Moore--[[User:Guvnur|Guvnur]] ([[User talk:Guvnur|talk]]) 16:44, 8 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== "Ismaili Vandal" Jerk is Back == |
|||
His edits can be seen using proxies [[User:84.255.131.37]], [[User:84.255.131.37]], etc. - see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%27Aql&action=history edit history of 'Aql]. To get around the anon-IP ban, he just changed IP. '''<font color=#BA55D3>[[User:Ogress|Ogress]]''' <sub>''[[User_Talk:Ogress|smash!]]''</sub></font> 18:40, 8 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Chicago Film Producers Alliance]] == |
|||
The user is new and does not appear to understand procedures. Might you consider userfying the article to [[User:Guvnur/sandbox/Chicago Film Producers Alliance]] so that it may be worked on and corrected over time? I really do not think the user understand how to create or use a sandbox, and I'd hate the article to get a "blck mark" becuase it was brought back too soon and in the wrong way. Thank you, '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<b><sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup></b>]]'' 18:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Re: My self-flagellation == |
|||
I was hoping that went unnoticed... Oh well, if I am going to accidentally block myself every April, I wish I at least had the comic timing to do it on April 1st. On the plus side, I am not the only one who likes to block themselves.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ARiana] |
|||
==HMS Archer (D78)== |
|||
Hi, I nominated this article for GA and it has been reviewed. Unfortunately it didn't pass. One of the issues raised at [[Talk:HMS_Archer_(D78)/GA1|the GA review]] is the fact that there is no source quoted for [[:File:HMS Archer (D78).jpg]] which you uploaded. Would you be kind enough to provide a source for the image? [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 06:51, 12 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Re the picture, if it is the work of the British Government before a certain time (1953?), then it is PD. Otherwise, if you can't be sure tag it as a copyrighted picture and add a fair use rationale. The issue will be dealt with then. [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 15:13, 12 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
I should add a disclaimer before I give any advice since I am most definitely not an image expert. I can tell you that if you cannot find the source for the image, even a Fair Use Rationale will not be sufficient. While I definitely recognize the encyclopedic value, I don't think there is a loophole in the IUP to permit them. If you can find the source, then everything is solved, but if not, you are correct that it appears that the only course of action will be the use of the delete button. Perhaps this would be best raised at [[WP:MCQ]] where the experts hang out. Sorry I can't be of more help, -'''[[User:MBK004|MBK]]'''<sub>[[User talk:MBK004|004]]</sub> 22:13, 12 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==RE:Friendly note regarding talk page messages== |
|||
Thanks for your note on this issue. I am aware of that policy, but reverted the deletion of the warnings because this user seems to be a vandalism-only account and he is taking steps to cover that. Based on his edit summaries I think it likely that he is not new to WP, just that he has been blocked or banned before and this is a new sock account. - [[User:Ahunt|Ahunt]] ([[User talk:Ahunt|talk]]) 12:06, 13 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Block == |
|||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AYwmpq205&diff=283545758&oldid=283488095 Thank you.] --[[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]] ([[User talk:Pdfpdf|talk]]) 13:08, 13 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== AN/I thread: Repeated personal attacks of User:Shannon Rose == |
|||
[[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Repeated_personal_attacks_of_User:Shannon_Rose]] |
|||
FYI. [[User:Ikip|Ikip]] ([[User talk:Ikip|talk]]) 15:58, 13 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Block == |
|||
I have added several things to Wikipedia, especially concerning multiple births and cloning. R3ap3r.inc does not assume good faith with new editors, and has deleted notices on his page, which is against policy, also. [[User:Netpassport89|Netpassport89]] ([[User talk:Netpassport89|talk]]) 19:16, 13 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:: For the record, I can remove anything I want from my talk page. This user continually defaces my personal talk page, despite being blocked twice for it now. [[User:R3ap3R.inc|R3ap3R.inc]] ([[User talk:R3ap3R.inc|talk]]) 20:27, 13 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::''R3ap3R.inc'' is quite right; as per [[WP:BLANKING]] editors may remove warnings ''at will'' from their own talk pages. — [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 21:07, 13 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== BC == |
|||
Thanks for your comment on my talk page - it is much appreciated. Best wishes, [[User:DuncanHill|DuncanHill]] ([[User talk:DuncanHill|talk]]) 18:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Faux block == |
|||
Hello. I just reverted this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:WadeSimMiser&diff=283832865&oldid=283193023] and wanted to make sure it was not a ligitamate block. If I've messed up, please let me know. Thanks. [[User:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:White;background:Red">Tide</span>''']][[User talk:Tide rolls|'''<span style="color:Red">rolls'''</span>]] 18:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Welcome message == |
|||
Hello Kralizec!, thanks for your welcome message :) |
|||
[[User:Arkanosis|Arkanosis]] ([[User talk:Arkanosis|talk]]) 16:05, 16 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== 2009 Tea Parties == |
|||
I was just wondering if the democrats and Independents could be added to the current list which includes Republicans and Libertarians. I met quite a few Democrats and Independents at the parties i went to. |
|||
Just trying to keep it real |
|||
Justin[[User:Justingrate|Justingrate]] ([[User talk:Justingrate|talk]]) 08:50, 18 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Steve Sheiring == |
|||
Sorry about the edit, i was just trying to be funny and forgot to set it back when the few people i told about it got a laugh. You have to admit that it was a little amusing. |
|||
[[User:Worldgate|Worldgate]] ([[User talk:Worldgate|talk]]) 00:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Re: Non-breaking spaces == |
|||
Oh ok. Thanks for the links to the Wikipedia guidelines. I've never seen that in any Wikipedia article before and it confused me. [[User:Douglasr007|Douglasr007]] ([[User talk:Douglasr007|talk]]) 05:41, 19 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==Almond image== |
|||
Thanks. I was at home and flipping through the family scrapbooks and found those images and figured it would be interesting to include in the article. My father did a side job to pick up a few bucks and help a family friend, and ended up helping with the harvest. He always has his camera with him, so it's great to get something like this. By the way, hopefully the OCB article does well today, since it's its busiest reading day of the year. Last year it had 16,500 people reading it on the anniversary, compared to ~2,000-3,000 every other day in the year. Happy editing! --[[User:Nehrams2020|Nehrams2020]] ([[User talk:Nehrams2020|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nehrams2020|contrib]]) 09:22, 19 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Meetup/Ohio 1|The first Wikipedian meetup in Ohio]] == |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Meetup/Ohio 1/Banner}} |
|||
Thanks! --[[User:Rkitko|Rkitko]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Rkitko|talk]])</small></sup> 21:24, 19 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Create User Block == |
|||
I understand why the ability to create a user is blocked at this IP address, but how did you know to block that area for this IP? As far as I can tell, you don't work as an administrator here. Not that I want you to unblock it, I was merely intrigued when it told me that a specific user blocked it ("{schoolblock}"). [[User:THEdemonlak|The original Demonlak]] ([[User talk:THEdemonlak|talk]]) 11:39, 20 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== DuPage County == |
|||
Exactly what is so special/sacred about DuPage County, Illinois anyway? [[User:Qwertgb|Qwertgb]] ([[User Talk:Qwertgb|talk]]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/192.203.136.252|192.203.136.252]] ([[User talk:192.203.136.252|talk]]) 22:12, 21 April 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Actually I do ''not'' feel that the DuPage area is any more or less special than any areas. However, I ''do'' feel quite strongly about the inappropriate edits like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chicago_metropolitan_area&diff=278441038&oldid=278414091 this] or [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chicago_metropolitan_area&diff=next&oldid=278441067 this] or pretty much anything written by your [[:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Qwertgb|various socks]]. — [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 01:23, 22 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==Block of [[User:Beerfinger|Beerfinger]]== |
|||
Could you please consider reversing this block? The user is new to Wikipedia and I have been trying to work him/her through a content dispute. The user has been engaging on the article talk page as well as the user's talk page and has already agreed not to make any further reverts. The block will really only stand in the way of moving forward without preventing any disruption. Thanks, --[[User:AuburnPilot|<font color="#000080">auburn</font><font color="#CC5500">pilot</font>]] [[User_talk:AuburnPilot|<small>talk</small>]] 01:42, 22 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:See also the report at the bottom of [[WP:AN3]] that was closed by {{user|J.delanoy}} as no block needed. Thanks, --[[User:AuburnPilot|<font color="#000080">auburn</font><font color="#CC5500">pilot</font>]] [[User_talk:AuburnPilot|<small>talk</small>]] 01:47, 22 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Thanks for the quick unblock. The situation seemed to have already resolved itself, per both user's agreement not to make any further reverts. While I certainly could be wrong, Beerfinger's intent struck me as genuine and I'm hoping the issue can be resolved without further action. Best, --[[User:AuburnPilot|<font color="#000080">auburn</font><font color="#CC5500">pilot</font>]] [[User_talk:AuburnPilot|<small>talk</small>]] 02:02, 22 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== IP addresses == |
|||
By the way, isn't it true that only major law enforcement agencies, such as the FBI, can look up an IP address and find out what the IP address is registered to? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/192.203.136.252|192.203.136.252]] ([[User talk:192.203.136.252|talk]]) 21:01, 23 April 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Nope. Anyone can do it. A Google search for the terms "reverse DNS" will find you a dozen tools. — [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 21:33, 23 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==70.169.143.203== |
|||
Hi. Will you please look at this vandalism-only account? Thanks! -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 19:20, 24 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Out of curiosity... == |
|||
Hi Krelizec! I was just reading your user page and have a question for you. It is purely curiosity and has nothing to do with the encyclopedia; if you prefer not to answer, that's fine. I notice that you say you semi-regularly attend Presbyterian church services even though you consider yourself an agnostic secular humanist. I can imagine several reasons why you might do that, but I'm wondering what your reasons are. As I said, this is just my being curious, and if you'd rather not answer, I won't be offended. [[User:LadyofShalott|<font color="#ee3366">'''Lady'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/LadyofShalott|<font color="#229922">''of''</font>]][[User_Talk:LadyofShalott|<font color="#0095c6">'''Shalott'''</font>]] |
|||
:No worries, I do not mind you asking at all [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKralizec%21&diff=286461531&oldid=285908998]. My first ancestor in the New World was my great great great great grandfather who emigrated from [[County Down]], Ireland to His Majesty's [[Province of Pennsylvania|Colony of Pennsylvania]] in the mid-1700s. That ancestor was Presbyterian, as had been his ancestors since before the [[Plantations of Ireland]] when they lived in Scotland. As such, I never saw the need for a little thing like my divergent personal beliefs to stand in the way of four centuries of family tradition. — [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 17:27, 27 April 2009 (UTC) ''(original reply [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ALadyofShalott&diff=286474970&oldid=286453116] copied from [[User talk:LadyofShalott]])'' |
|||
== Trimming == |
|||
It's not just Wikipedia, they need to come off the internet completely. [[User:Giano II|Giano]] ([[User talk:Giano II|talk]]) 21:17, 27 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:My wife and I are working to find the right balance of transparency and privacy that best meets our needs. Thanks, — [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 23:10, 27 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== New Romanticism == |
|||
I asked you to reconsider your decision at [[Wikipedia:Requests for page protection]]. If you don't reconsider, I'd be grateful if you'd indicate another method of engaging with an anonymous editor who resists all efforts to engage. Cheers. [[User:Hiding|Hiding]] <small>[[User talk:Hiding|T]] </small> 13:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Glitter_.28soundtrack.29_.28edit.7Ctalk.7Chistory.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29 Glitter at RFPP] == |
|||
I'm confused. Why did you tag my request as "done", without either protecting anything or explaining why you would not?—[[User:Kww|Kww]]([[User talk:Kww|talk]]) 17:28, 28 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:That would be a user error on my part. I misread your protection request and though you were saying that with the blocks were in place, protection was not needed (in other words, I thought it said the exact opposite of what you were saying). I have semi-protected the requested articles for fourteen days. Thank you for bringing this oversight to my attention, and sorry for the inconvenience. — [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 17:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:03, 29 April 2009
I'm still here asshole! I got 300 new accounts. Now shut up and go away!!!