User talk:Nancy: Difference between revisions
Reverted to revision 339358457 by MiszaBot III; rem trolling. (TW) |
→are you a social life failure?: new section |
||
Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
Hello Nancy! I think wayyyyyy wayyyyy back you and I came in contact once, but to be honest I don't know. I was just curious if you could take a look [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Dusti|at this]] and possibly provide your feedback? I would greatly appreciate your comments and I look forward to talking with you soon :) <font face="Segoe script">[[User:Dusti|'''<font color="#ff0000">D</font><font color="#ff6600">u</font><font color="#009900">s</font><font color="#0000ff">t</font><font color="#6600cc">i</font>''']][[User talk:Dusti|<sup>SPEAK!!</sup>]]</font> 01:29, 20 January 2010 (UTC) |
Hello Nancy! I think wayyyyyy wayyyyy back you and I came in contact once, but to be honest I don't know. I was just curious if you could take a look [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Dusti|at this]] and possibly provide your feedback? I would greatly appreciate your comments and I look forward to talking with you soon :) <font face="Segoe script">[[User:Dusti|'''<font color="#ff0000">D</font><font color="#ff6600">u</font><font color="#009900">s</font><font color="#0000ff">t</font><font color="#6600cc">i</font>''']][[User talk:Dusti|<sup>SPEAK!!</sup>]]</font> 01:29, 20 January 2010 (UTC) |
||
== are you a social life failure? == |
|||
Why you so care about my talk page? I can do with it what I want unless there's no mat. Take a break and go relax to [[Siberia]], kid. [[Special:Contributions/95.68.45.171|95.68.45.171]] ([[User talk:95.68.45.171|talk]]) 11:34, 23 January 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:34, 23 January 2010
Welcome to my talk page
2007 · 01 · 2008 · 02 · 03 · 04 · 05 · 06 · 07 · 08 · 09 · 10 · 2009 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
- DID I DELETE YOUR PAGE? If so please check User:Nancy/Why? for an explanation first. If you are still none the wiser then please click here to leave me a message
- I will reply on this page as I prefer to keep conversations all in one place but may alert you on your talk page too so you get the nice orange bar.
- If I have written something on your talk page, I will be watching it so feel free to reply there if you wish. If you prefer to reply here that's fine too.
- Threads older than 7 days are archived automatically by MiszaBot
Contents
MisterSoup and continued harassmentHi - User:MisterSoup is back to harassing me. Tonight, he/she placed the following on my talk page [1] I have to wonder if this user is the same one who has been harassing me for a couple of months now (maybe more) with blanking my talk page and user page, adding harassing comments, etc. In some cases, the one doing this kind of stuff used an IP only, but there was another user - User:RegisFugit - who was engaging in this behavior on my pages as well. I think it's possible they are all the same user (I would hate to think there's more than one person like this who dislikes me this much ;-). In any case, I hope this latest round of harassment from MisterSoup is enough to get him blocked if not banned. IMO, he/she never should have been let back after it was discovered he/she was a sock. --SkagitRiverQueen (talk) 05:04, 13 January 2010 (UTC) Pasting a discussion about above mentioned user isn't harassment. I wanted her to be aware of discussion MisterSoup (talk) 06:30, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Following up on discussion at my talk: Given the contribs I support this indef block as appropriate. I see that it's alleged that MS is a returning sock. I was not able to determine who might be the sockmaster, only that MS was themselves running a sock. That doesn't mean they aren't a sock, per
Datchet Bridge reviewI have concluded my opening review at Talk:Datchet Bridge/GA1. Please reply to my questions and address the concerns. Thanks! Binksternet (talk) 18:18, 13 January 2010 (UTC) <=You, too, were a pleasure to work with on this GA process. If you take one of your suffragette articles to GAN, nudge me to review it. Binksternet (talk) 21:09, 15 January 2010 (UTC) Rollback re-request.I remember from two weeks ago you removed my access of being a rollbacker. I wasn't deliberately abusing it, All that happened was I just found the anti-vandalism program Huggle difficult to use. I use Twinkle to revert vandalism and I find it much easier, and so far I didn't get warned for misuse. The problem I found with Huggle is that you can't see the updated article along with the changed text, and that problem made it harder for me to concentrate. I'm taking a re-request for rollback rights, as per Wikipedia:Requests_for_rollback_privileges. I'm trying my best to assume good faith in all my reverts, and I didn't get warned so far for any revert using Twinkle. Minimac94 (talk) 09:26, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy DeleteDear Nancy: No, please delete them. Article age means nothing, other than unawareness or laziness on the part of others. These pages are valueless and cost Wikipedia money to maintain. In fact, we need another (yes, there was one a few years ago) major cleanup of this worthless clogging material. Thanx. Handicapper (talk) 17:14, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
The General and the SargeantGreetings (and in that order). Thanks for your reply on an article for Mary Sargeant Gove Nichols. I had a look at the General article, and I concur (agree even). A spirited, intelligent and witty woman making a stand with a touch of we might now call the pythonesque to accentuate one or more points. I can think of a sociologist I once knew, with a dog called "Lucky" (which I called "Lucky woof", just to remind that remarkable dog that she was in fact a dog - not that it made much difference...) who would find much inspiration in such biographies. I too enjoy the bonkers element of real life, which is where all the best pythonesque surreality, is to be found after all, in my opinion. You see a touch of that in Robert Liston, courtesy of Richard Gordon quotes, which are both factually accurate and unbeatable prose for that context. Of course the pythonesqueness of The General doesn't rely on prose to illustrate a point. She created a legacy whereby the most dry description could not possibly miss the point and be accurate at the same time. I hypothesise that was foresight, not accident. But foresight or accident, it is good stuff indeed, of which more could be said. The General and the Sargeant may yet prove to be a nice complement (collect the complete set!). Wotnow (talk) 23:03, 16 January 2010 (UTC) SPIHi, Nancy! I need to ask about a sock I suspect, who has recently been editing an article I've watched and contributed to for a long time. While this sock doesn't seem to be overtly disruptive, the fact that he/she is a sock has really never been defended against my accusation, and rather sort of acknowledged with weak excuses. The very brief edit history, combined with the focus and obvious knowledge of WP, lead me to believe that this is a "sock with an agenda". How can I e-mail you in order to further ask your opinion without naming anyone unduly? I need a CU done - can you help me? Thanks :> Doc9871 (talk) 09:41, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Poponhop69Hi, Nancy. Would it be worth a CU on this user to flush out sleepers? AFI-PUNK is pretty prolific. --RrburkeekrubrR 16:23, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Phaxanation & The Dust KickersHi Nancy, I created the page for "Phaxanation & The Dust Kickers" as a band however it was deleted due to a a lack of significance or importance on the subject. I also created the page for the band "Darker My Love" a few years ago, which is in my opinion is an identical situation to this one, and the Darker My Love page has flourished, received factual updates as the band progressed and gained popularity. I believe the page I most recently created for Phaxanation & The Dust Kickers shows it's importance and significance as a band/musician and has the potential to grow and evolve just as the Darker My Love page did. If you could please let me know if I added any incorrect criteria or failed to do something I had done previous, I would be highly appreciative. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.251.82.55 (talk) 22:00, 18 January 2010 (UTC) Greetings!Hello Nancy! I think wayyyyyy wayyyyy back you and I came in contact once, but to be honest I don't know. I was just curious if you could take a look at this and possibly provide your feedback? I would greatly appreciate your comments and I look forward to talking with you soon :) DustiSPEAK!! 01:29, 20 January 2010 (UTC) are you a social life failure?Why you so care about my talk page? I can do with it what I want unless there's no mat. Take a break and go relax to Siberia, kid. 95.68.45.171 (talk) 11:34, 23 January 2010 (UTC) |