User talk:PMDrive1061

A Cookie is just not enough...

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		This is for all your hard work in just the past week, kicking out the most annoying sockpuppet ever to ruin a Disney article! Your diligence has definitely made it a lot easier for the rest of us to actually do some editing. Cheers, and keep up the good work! Cactusjump (talk)

tin Cup Oil Field

Hey I just started the article, why dont you just hold on a second. When I get done it will have quite a lot of information, that is both useful and helpful

== Thanks, that is helpful, I was just getting the documetns to upload

Unidentified content deleted without rationale

You recent addded an entry to my talk page. Could you please state explicitly what you deleted, and what specifically is the basis for deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikemaccana (talk • contribs)

Ok!

I will not continue but can you please let me have the code back to the article i was almost done! Also if it is illegal do not get mad at me. Like i said more than once i'm writing a paper sorry if that broke any rules :(

Accidental deletion of Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp Resorts involving page moves

Moved to User talk:Emmette Hernandez Coleman#Question for administrator 2

BF101: Reply

Another one bites the dust! Heh heh Cactusjump (talk) 16:39, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Sigh, the aggrevation is back again and managed to con another good editor into doing edits for him! User:Ice Age lover and User:207.201.216.12 are the socks. I've sent to AIV and I think I got the latest round of stuff cleaned up. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 00:34, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

I see that you have semi-protected or protected a lot of articles. I don't know the history behind this Bambifan101 sockpuppet master so I won't tell you what to do, but I'm wondering, is it really necessary to FULLY protect some of those articles until December 2009? Gary King (talk) 04:31, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

He's been at this for over a year, using IP and named socked including ranges no one will range block because of collateral damage. 120+ confirmed socks, and another 109 highly likely just not tagged confirmed (mostly the IPs) Semi-protecting his targets has been the only thing that had any effect in slowing his efforts (and now he's taken to trying to trick established editors into doing edits for him or getting them to make unprotection requests). See Wikipedia:Long term abuse#Bambifan101 for a longer summary. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 04:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm talking about FULLY protected articles. Us regulars can't edit them, only admins can. Gary King (talk) 04:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

You issued full protection on several articles, including Scooby-Doo and the Alien Invaders, Garfield's Fun Fest, Kung Fu Panda, The Penguins of Madagascar, and dozens more. Gary King (talk) 05:49, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

I assure you that I cannot edit them. Gary King (talk) 05:56, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure it's not a software bug. If you check your contributions, you can find the articles that you marked as fully protected by searching for the string "edit=sysop". Gary King (talk) 05:59, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

(Chiming in) I agree that the ones mentioned by Gary King above are all fully-protected. If I, as an admin, click "edit" on Scooby-Doo and the Alien Invaders, I get the usual text: "WARNING: This page has been protected so that only administrators can edit it. Please ensure that you are following the protection policy." I get the log entry "02:29, 29 June 2009 PMDrive1061 (talk | contribs | block) protected Scooby-Doo and the Alien Invaders [edit=sysop] (expires 02:29, 29 December 2009 (UTC)) [move=sysop] (expires 02:29, 29 December 2009 (UTC)) ‎ (Excessive vandalism: Bambifan101 target) (hist | change)" (emphasis added), and I get the pink background to the editing box indicating a fully-protected page. Bencherlite^Talk 06:04, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't have a particular article that I'd like to get unprotected at the moment, no. I just noticed that one of the articles I was watching was fully protected, which I found extremely odd considering it gets one or two edits a month on average. I can wait until you are able to drop the fully protected articles down to semi-protection. There are roughly 40 pages that you have fully protected recently. Gary King (talk) 06:06, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism will always be a threat. I don't really see how placing dozens or even hundreds of articles under semi-protection will solve anything, since persistent vandals, like how you described this one in particular, will always find an unprotected article to vandalize if they feel like it. Gary King (talk) 06:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Bump? Gary King (talk) 18:15, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Requesting_that_several_fully_protected_articles_be_unprotected Gary King (talk) 03:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Only Magic Carpet (Aladdin) and Talk:Kronk's New Groove are left. Gary King (talk) 18:37, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

• scream* its bad enough dealing with that idiot kid and his socks, but now another sockpuppetter is being a pain in the ass and encouraging OckhamTheFox's continued proxy editing. I've posted at ANI and there is an open SPI, but this is getting so annoying. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 18:51, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

The protection on The Fox and the Hound appears to have expired, and it was hit again almost immediately. Looks like he may have a new IP range and is quick hopping between IPs. Guess he went traveling again...ugh. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:21, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Question

Earlier today I closed an Mfd (Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Allsterecho talk redirects) that I had voted in. Usually you shouldn't do this, however, the result was "speedy delete" and was carried out by Graeme Bartlett. Obviously, as I am not an admin, I didn't delete it myself. I only closed it because Graeme seemed to have forgotten. Do you think this will come back to bite me later on? -T'Shael,The Vulcan Overlord 16:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC 04:09, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Ah, okay, thanks. :) As to Bambifan, I appreciate the accolades, but I'm not sure that I did anything to deserve them. Maybe it was Collectian? Or perhaps I did and forgot, as this has happened in the past. Either way, I appreciate it. :) -T'Shael,The Vulcan Overlord 16:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC 04:13, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Haha, perhaps I was. Today has been crazy and I've been all over the place, so I probably just don't remember. I've had the privilege of running into several of his socks, and must agree with you, that I do pity him, as he's more sad than anything else. Haven't seen you around lately but hope to see you more active in the future as you are quite an asset to this site. Cheers! -T'Shael,The Vulcan Overlord 16:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC 04:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

user:Littleboy o.O

THANK YOU. That little guy was the most annoying vandal I've had to deal with in quite a while. I am so incredibly pleased to see him blocked. :) -T'Shael,The Vulcan Overlord 16:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC 00:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

XOP Networks Page Deletion

The recently created wikipedia page for XOP Networks was subject to speedy deletion. I justified the existence of the page by saying it was not created for promotion or vandalism. Please let me know if it is safe to begin editing the page under this new user name which more clearly identifies me as an individual, not a company associate. (I am not employed by XOP Networks, nor do I have any intention of promoting their products.) I simply wanted to begin their encyclopedia page so that others may learn about the company's history, founding, and miscellaneous facts. Again, I just want to know if I can safely make edits to this page under my new user name.

Thanks, Chirag Gupta

XOP Networks Page Deletion

Date/Time of last post: Cgupta731 (talk) 19:52, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your advices,but I tried to write enough information in my voices:I write all the informations contained in the template,describing the player's career and even his presences and goals. I know that these are not good articles,but it's the best I can do because I speak a very bad English. Next time I'll try to add some external links regarding the object of the article.--Der Schalk (talk) 14:23, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Mayor of Strawberry Fields

Why did you delete this article, man? It had plenty of quotes, and a link to a video. The dude exists, he's been doing his thing for 15 years. He's been reported in the New york Post, among other mainstream publications. C'mon bro, let's restore the article and put in on par with wikipedia's standards.--Mazeartist (talk) 14:57, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Please take a look at this

You got email;)SchnitzelMannGreek. 23:53, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

To be honest, I actually sent an important email via wikipedia. Please dont tell me it didn't come in, did it?SchnitzelMannGreek.

Can you give me your email, I want to discuss something privately.SchnitzelMannGreek. 01:02, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

You got it?SchnitzelMannGreek. 01:13, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Tell me when you've replied;)SchnitzelMannGreek. 01:21, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Hope I'm not bugging you, but I replied to your reply with a solution. Can you please check it out?SchnitzelMannGreek. 01:28, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

You got even more mail:)SchnitzelMannGreek. 13:02, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

LTA | BF101

Hey, I'm almost to the point of processing your abuse report on BF101, and was wondering if all the information was on Wikipedia:LTA/BF101? I'm going to submit all the information regarding this vandal, and probably remain in contact with the ISP for a while. So far, Most of the information is found at Wikipedia:LTA/BF101, but is there any other place where I can find information?

On a different but related topic...

I don't exactly think Wikipedia:LTA/BF101 fits with WP:DENY. These LTA pages are basically creating a "shrine" to these vandals. (quoted from someone else). Even though this isn't on their talk pages, there's still entire pages dedicated to investigating them. They most likely want attention and recognition of their impact, and LTA pages are giving just that. What are your view on that? Netalarm 23:04, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Heh, not a problem. If I'd actually looked at his contribs rather than cruising by in huggle, I'd have blocked as vandalism-only myself and saved you the trouble. -- Pakaran 06:13, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Can the messages be made more specific please?

I just added an article on Himalayan Dolpo Healing Project with the aim of getting more visibility for this charity project.

However, it got deleted stating it has copyright infringement. This is all well and good but this is my very first article and the message did not tell me where the problem was. It is only when I added the article for the second time after removing Google Map reference that you explained what the problem was. A clearer explanation of the problem may have avoided wasting your time and my time. Please consider the fact that not everyone in this world is a Wiki Guru.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gdesilva (talk • contribs) 06:13, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the unblock!

Thank you for the unblock! Now that i'm fre, do you have any editing advice for me? ShermDawk (talk) 06:25, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

why did you take of mjp

i was sill working on it