User talk:Trusilver

Unless otherwise specified, I will respond to you on whichever page the conversation started on. If I left a message in a discussion page or on your user page, please respond to me there - I will return and read it there.

This user is a commercial airline pilot and as such is often unavailable for extended periods of time. If he does not get back to you immediately after you leave a message, don't take it personally. He's probably just busy and will respond to you as quickly as possible.

If you have an issue with a vandalism revert I have made, I'm very sorry. I'm not infallible and I will occasionally revert a good faith edit that appears to be vandalism. Leave me a message and I will review my action and reverse it if my assumption was false. And above all...smile and take a deep breath, we all make mistakes and we are both trying to work in the best interests of the project.

Please attempt to stay as close to the top of the pyramid as possible.

Please don't call my edit unconstructive

I changed the date on that page because it was wrong. It's 1988 and it should be 1968. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.165.137.199 (talk) 17:24, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, you are absolutely correct. I dug into the reference material and confirmed the year. Cheers and happy editing. Trusilver 21:13, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

		The Userpage Shield
		A small token of appreciation for some minor cleanup on my user talk. Apologies, but there is no cash prize :) Tiderolls 01:13, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Not a problem, but how many times do I have to revert vandalism on your page before I get the cash prize? Trusilver 20:37, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Hello Trusilver! I hope you enjoy this home-made cookie of mine as a warm greeting from a fellow Wikipedian. Sp33dyphil © • © 07:09, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you! Still reading that article, should be finished with it in a little while. Trusilver 20:38, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

• - Yes, allow me to offer you some hot cocoa to dip your cookie in as a way of thanks for your revert of the attacking type comment edit from my talkpage. I also enjoyed a few minutes reading your userpage and your recall conditions (which I would support) Many thanks to you for your contributions here. Off2riorob (talk) 18:41, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

• - Not a problem and much appreciated :) Trusilver 18:50, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Re: Revert on Bitcoin

How is this edit reverting a personal attack, exactly? You seem merely to be removing a link... --bd_ (talk) 19:48, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Yeah it was. I went just a little bit too far down and clicked the wrong box. I mean to give him a warning for adding inappropriate links per WP:EL, as is noted by the warning on that user's talk page.[1]. Trusilver 20:20, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

A beer for you

Thankyou for participating in my request for adminship. Now I've got lots of extra buttons to try and avoid pressing by mistake... Redrose64 (talk) 14:55, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

No problem, Good luck. Trusilver 15:40, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Re: RfA question

Thanks for the beer! Just add more...and more...and more, that's how I did it. HurricaneFan25 13:25, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Hah, no problem :) Trusilver 16:03, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Hence human evolution history: the geology - anthropology of the future life (HG)

could you explain why you believe the edit I made to Talk:Hence human evolution history: the geology - anthropology of the future life (HG) is vandalism? The content of the talk page was the article reposted. That is not what talk pages are for. Since the article was already deleted, that content is doubly inappropriate. The talk page should be deleted since the article [age it is attached to has been deleted.

Please assume good faith and please look more deeply at the changes you are making before accusing others of vandalism. I would appreciate it if you could remove the incorrect warning from my talk page. Thanks, Sparthorse (talk) 05:05, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Please use descriptive edit summaries when blanking a page. It goes a long way to keep you from looking suspicious, especially as a "new editor". "Removed article content" is redundant, I can figure out that just by the fact that you just removed the article content. Trusilver 05:13, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Article content is inappropriate for talk pages. Therefore in the context of an edit to a talk page, the edit summary "remove article content" is descriptive. Again, please remove the inappropriate vandalism warning from my talk page. Thank you, Sparthorse (talk) 05:42, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

The Last Airbender

Why do you erase the reception of WordGirl or May I Have a Word on The Last Airbender? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.26.233.139 (talk) 05:08, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Only because it was critical and failed to have a reference. Please take a look at WP:CITE. If you have a source for this edit, please put it in. If you aren't entirely sure how to do this, then let me know and I will help you to source the edit. Trusilver 05:11, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Sandy Point, Washington

The link #REDIRECT was to the wrong sandy point. The old article was incorrect. Sandy point is near Bellingham or Ferndale, not Langly. I do not know about the rest of the article. How would you handle this?

Ah yeah. I saw that edit and I kept meaning to send you a message, but I've been doing about fifteen things at once. I see that the redirect is wrong, but putting an external website on it is not the correct way to go about it. Let me look into it and get back to you here shortly. Trusilver 19:32, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

I looked into it, and the only location that I'm finding for Sandy Point, Washington is a place within a park in Washington next to Langley. If this is incorrect, I suggest you start by putting a note on the talk page and discussing it or, better yet, being bold and writing a new article for the correct location. Trusilver 20:45, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

I have removed the reference from the disambiguation page. The original one is probably incorrect / non-notable, but the community near Bellingham does not appear in independent sources, and thus is likely below the threshold for inclusion. Please add it back if you can cite independent sources to show that it is a known geographical location (and not just a collection of housing developments). Thanks. wctaiwan (talk) 06:39, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Sorry about that! :( This kitty is lonely and needs a friend like you.

HurricaneFan25 20:04, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Hah! no problem :) It happens. Trusilver 20:05, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello! I have a question...

I'm sorry, but i must ask. Do you believe in the group named... Anonymous? Anonymous: We Are Legion!!!