User talk:יערוניק

72 Dangerous Animals: Australia moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 72 Dangerous Animals: Australia, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. echidnaLives - talk - edits 23:47, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:EchidnaLives, what the problem on this article? is built like other article like 72 Dangerous Animals: Latin America and 72 Dangerous Animals: Asia. יערוניק (talk) 08:54, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The other 2 articles have 3 sources. The new article has just 1. echidnaLives - talk - edits 09:39, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

they only link for Netflix but for this is no in Netflix. i can to give more one if this enouth. יערוניק (talk) 09:42, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

okey User:EchidnaLives, I am add it. יערוניק (talk) 09:57, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

okey User:EchidnaLives, I am add it. you can to bring back the article? יערוניק (talk) 12:18, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The sources are not independent, or in depth. The article also requires some copyediting. When this has been addressed, please submit it by clicking the button at the top of the article instead of pinging me. Thanks, echidnaLives - talk - edits 00:02, 9 December 2022 (UTC).[reply]

okey, now its ready. this edited and reasoned accsucly, not less from another articles from the media like 72 Dangerous Animals: Latin America and 72 Dangerous Animals: Asia. please EchidnaLives bring the article back. יערוניק (talk) 11:41, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

72 Dangerous Animals: Australia moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 72 Dangerous Animals: Australia, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:19, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Onel5969, do you seen the difrent from 72 Dangerous Animals: Australia from 72 Dangerous Animals: Asia or 72 Dangerous Animals: Latin America. the article its ready, i dont know what missing according the criterions of the other programs in the series. dont be with double standards please. i work on this many lot, this no reasen. יערוניק (talk) 13:27, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It needs at least 3 in-depth sources from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Currently, it has zero. WP:OSE is not a valid argument. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:31, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 72 Dangerous Animals: Australia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 72 Dangerous Animals: Australia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/72 Dangerous Animals: Australia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 01:21, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]