Jump to content

User talk:106.205.72.176

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Vikraman Radhakrishnan[edit]

My friend, you must not edit war. Take your concerns to the Vikraman Radhakrishnan talk page. If you keep doing what you are doing, you might get blocked. No-one wants that.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:59, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:BoyTheKingCanDance
Sir, the link [1] is not even speaking about the matter.106.205.72.176 (talk) 07:00, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I answered you on the Vikraman Radhakrishnan talk page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 07:01, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User:BoyTheKingCanDance Sir at least you tell me reason for stopping me. Do you dispute my edit?. 106.205.72.176 (talk) 11:43, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:BoyTheKingCanDance Sir 24 hours is over. Can I delete it now? 106.205.72.176 (talk) 07:41, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

106.205.72.176, no of course not. Now you have to wait until other editors engage. Sometimes that can take a while. Stay patient. Do not edit war in the meantime. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 08:59, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User:BoyTheKingCanDance The info from the page is not in ref no. 4 & ref no.5. It can be deleted. Sir at least you tell me reason for stopping me. Do you dispute my edit? 106.205.72.176 (talk) 09:02, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What you are trying to do is impose your own agenda -- meaning the interpretation that you insist is true -- on a page that has been stable and which repesents a consensus .Please be patient. Please. Don't edit war. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 09:05, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sir. The page is only created on 20 January 2023‎
'During his term as spokesman, Vikraman made a controversial speech about Hinduism and the deities related to the religion.' is not in ref no. 4.
' After making this speech he was asked to resign from the political party and give up his position as spokesman. However, he later apologized for his remarks' is not in ref no 5.
User:Hoary told me wait 48 hours and delete it 106.205.72.176 (talk) 09:16, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User:BoyTheKingCanDance 106.205.72.176 (talk) 09:23, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't mean you won't be reverted again. Be aware of that. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 10:09, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User:BoyTheKingCanDance Please give me reason to revert me Sir 106.205.72.176 (talk) 10:12, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You have not established that the sources are unacceptable. You have just asserted it. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 10:17, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User:BoyTheKingCanDance
'During his term as spokesman, Vikraman made a controversial speech about Hinduism and the deities related to the religion.' is not in ref no. 4.
' After making this speech he was asked to resign from the political party and give up his position as spokesman. However, he later apologized for his remarks' is not in ref no 5.
Kindly check this 106.205.72.176 (talk) 10:20, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have added verbatim quotes to the article from each source. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 10:28, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]