User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

April 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Vanjagenije. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Diatessaron because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!Vanjagenije (talk) 18:48, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Diatessaron. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:45, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm Vanjagenije. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Diatessaron, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:22, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm Vanjagenije. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you. Talking about this: [1] Vanjagenije (talk) 22:23, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

I do NOT care about your opinion nor if what I stated offended you, that is your problem and NOT mine. I provided factual information and you can NOT delete it just because you do NOT agree with it. Factual articles must have facts and NOT opinions. You are ignorant of many things yet you act like you know everything and project it onto articles and others. Like I stated before, mind your own business. Stick to Serbia and civil engineering. Also, stick to minor edits of English because you obviously have problems with understanding advanced sentence structure, since you removed perfectly structured sentences and claimed that they were NOT constructive. The information in the brackets provides explanation of the two genealogies. The reason the explanation of the two genealogies is in brackets is because the article is NOT about the two genealogies BUT about Tatian's Harmony.

May 2014[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Arianism, you may be blocked from editing. Saddhiyama (talk) 00:47, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

My editing is NOT disruptive! It is YOUR opinion. I posted the Arian creed which is from the Auxentius letter, which is NOT original research. The Athanasian Creed is posted. Why are you biased?? Also, posting Bible verses from where Arian beliefs are drawn from is NOT adding personal analysis or synthesis that advances a position. It is YOUR opinion because you have no idea what Arians believed. Furthermore, the articles must be neutral; therefore, this article must NOT be only written from the Trinitarian perspective, which it was. Arians did not believe in 3 Persons; therefore, they did not believe in the Trinity and the article claimed that they believe in a Trinity that consists of 3 separate beings, which imposes polytheism onto Arian beliefs.