User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hold on a bit[edit]

I can probably find some references in Stone's "Fundamentals of Automotive Engineering" - it woudl be better to keep this section and add references, instead of deleting what may be the most single common application of the Wax thermostatic element principle. --Wtshymanski (talk) 14:32, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Wax thermostatic element, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. This edit is both quite wrong, and (despite your other edits) unsourced. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:22, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


It was brought to my attention that your removal of unsourced bits of info was, actually, a rather WP:POINTY action. As I've said on WP:ANEW, I'm not going to block, hoping we can stop the ongoing disruption in a more civilised fashion. Please, do not revert any more or I'll have no other choice but to block your account or protect the article but discuss the issue on the talk page. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:35, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


For Your Information (no action required, but you may choose to participate):

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wtshymanski

Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Wtshymanski

--Guy Macon (talk) 18:28, 14 May 2012 (UTC)