Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Toccata quarta (talk) 21:44, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
These edits are not unconstructive by any means. It truly reflects the opinion of Anand's strength as judged by his peers. I have seen a constant attempt by many editors to downgrade Anand's acheivements, despite the very high praise from his peers like Vladimir Kramnik and great chess commentators like Lubomir Kavalek. My only interpretation of these Wikipedia editors' behavior is that they have latent racist need to downgrade Anand's acheivements, despite the overwhelming praise from his peers. Please stop being a racist.
- This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Toccata quarta (talk) 04:52, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
You have been deleting posts that are crucially important from a chess history point of view. This can only be interpreted in negative ways (i.e., lack of understanding of chess and chess history, or deliberately deleting legitimate material). Please do not revert these pertinent changes or delegate them to the bottom of the article, esp. when they are important from a chess history point of view.
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.