User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Information icon.svg Attention:

This IP address, (, is registered to Verizon Internet Services Inc., an Internet service provider through which thousands of individual users may connect to the internet. This IP may be randomly assigned to a different person when the current user disconnects. Warnings or messages left on this page may not be received by the intended user. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Habesha people. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Michaelas10 (Talk) 14:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

With regards to your comments on Talk:Habesha people: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 22:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

I am assuming that you are Not44 (talk contribs) and simply haven't signed in (compare [1] and [2], [3] and [4]). Please stop removing the text from the "Genetics" section of Habesha people. Note that Wikipedia's verifiability policy specifies that verifiability, not truth, is the threshold for inclusion. If you believe the cited source is invalid, then please help us all out and provide a better reference with current information. Otherwise, leave the existing text alone until a better source is found. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 22:34, 18 December 2006 (UTC)


That is not freaking fair. You know people have more than one answer to a question. How can you choose his answer over mine? Just look at multiple forums. That same text written in the genetics section is disputed 50/50 by hundreds if not thousands of others online. So I ask again, How can his or their info be more true than ours??

The text in question cites its source. As I've already suggested, please have a look at Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you have better and/or current information then by all means, include it, and cite your source. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 00:07, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
By the way online forums, discussions etc. themselves are not verifiable sources. -- Gyrofrog (talk)