User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

January 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Dear John letter, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Dear John letter was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed ( is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:30, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

The Mole[edit]

Hi, and thank you for your edits on The Mole.

In terms of terminations, do you think that, had the show remained at three-nights-a-week, that the final week (Week 7, after Nick's termination) would have promoted "triple termination week", leading up to the reveal? That's how I saw it.

The season would have lasted seven weeks instead of fifteen (it was stretched out because poor ratings caused the show to revert to its once-a-week format. It was for this reason that The X Factor was brought forward by three weeks, as after The Mole was originally meant to conclude in the week starting Monday 12 August, TXF would have started week starting Monday 19 August). That's my theory only.

I had to request protection of the page back in September because someone kept vandalising the page. That was why you were not able to edit the page, as only Wikipedia users (such as myself) could do so. MasterMind5991 (talk) 03:56, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Who can say? But I think there needed to be something there about the termination format. I've watched every edition of The Mole ever produced in the English language, and read about most of the versions in other languages, and the way the show worked for the first half to two-thirds or so was unique. I actually first wrote the initial phrase that I tweaked today, before the irritating protection went into effect. It became outdated, but I guess no one with access saw fit to update it. Do tweak it yourself if you like -- I just wanted ~something~ to be said about the termination format. -- (talk) 04:05, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Major League Baseball perfect games. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. Your edits are unsourced. That is why they were removed. Please add a source or the content will be removed again. Zackmann08 (talk) 21:19, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, You have new messages at Zackmann08's talk page.
Message added 21:25, 16 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Zackmann08 (talk) 21:25, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

2015 Baltimore Riots[edit]

Your edit request has been fulfilled. Zell Faze (talk) 16:29, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

MOS:IDENTITY is being revisited: How should Wikipedia refer to transgender individuals before and after their transition?[edit]

You are being contacted because you contributed to a recent discussion of MOS:IDENTITY that closed with the recommendation that Wikipedia's policy on transgender individuals be revisited.

Two threads have been opened at the Village Pump:Policy. The first addresses how the Manual of Style should instruct editors to refer to transgender people in articles about themselves (which name, which pronoun, etc.). The second addresses how to instruct editors to refer to transgender people when they are mentioned in passing in other articles. Your participation is welcome. Darkfrog24 (talk) 02:19, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

December 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Mahveotm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Home run, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mahveotm (talk) 00:48, 14 December 2017 (UTC)