User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

In addition, your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! SarahStierch (talk) 23:48, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPs)[edit]

Do not violate the WP:BLP policy like you did here, here and elsewhere. Flyer22 (talk) 03:30, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Not a violation of BLP. All of that is in citations given. You are undoing my work for no reason. (talk) 04:08, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
(talk page stalker)Hello, sorry to see your edits were reverted. I see you provided sources. Wikipedia guidelines states the sources must be reliable (WP:RS), especially for living persons (WP:BLP), and blogs have always been a sore point on Wikipedia. You don't have to give up; I suggest you go to the article talk pages and discuss your edits there. Meanwhile, try to locate other sources; you will probably find them published. Good luck. Prhartcom (talk) 22:54, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Improper categories[edit]

Please stop adding people to categories when their membership in that category is not supported in the article text with a reliable source. For example, here you added Ralph Bakshi to a category that is not even mentioned in his article. --Laser brain (talk) 04:27, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

July 2014[edit]

Information icon Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Sean Paul, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 18:06, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

March 2015[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to M. S. Golwalkar. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. You have been warned about adding improper categories earlier, which are continuing to do. Kautilya3 (talk) 07:31, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Zalman Schachter-Shalomi[edit]

Please stop edit-warring to add information to Zalman Schachter-Shalomi. The sources you're using do not satisfy the requirements of Wikipedia's guidelines concerning reliable sources. Furthermore, they do not support the information you are trying to add to the article.

Instead of edit-warring, please discuss the issue at Talk:Zalman Schachter-Shalomi. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:32, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Zalman Schachter-Shalomi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. New England Cop (talk) 03:20, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. New England Cop (talk) 03:24, 12 March 2015 (UTC)