User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

July 2010[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Jack Warner (football executive) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Geoff Who, me? 20:26, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

September 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Fumblerooski has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:27, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

February 2011[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Carl Vinson, you may be blocked from editing. King of ♠ 07:50, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

fr Cet utilisateur a pour langue maternelle le français.
ubxrand · view ubx · random ubx
CVU.svg This user fights vandalism.

Look at me, I got me some medals.

Tireless Contributor Barnstar.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Spinning like my rims
100px The Shinto Barnstar
The Teamwork Barnstar The Editor's Barnstar The Working Man's Barnstar
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar The Barnstar of Diligence The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
The Multiple Barnstar
Cause I earned it.

Talk:Traditional Chinese medicine[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Carl Vinson, you may be blocked from editing.

Also, please refrain from using profanity.[1] PPdd (talk) 17:25, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

RE: Talk:Traditional Chinese medicine[edit]

Yeah, because expressing my opinion of a terrible article in the talk section counts as disruptive editing. Go write 5 more paragraphs more about how those "wacky inscrutable" Chinese keep using tiger, human, and deer penis as a medicine, rather than anything remotely relevant about actually how they diagnose their patients. And after that, you can go back to admiring cartoon characters. So piss off.

July 2011[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Led Zeppelin. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 09:29, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

RE: Led Zepplin[edit]

Ha ha ha, mad Led Zeppelin fans trying to whitewash the fact that LZ stole the damn song from a black artist. (Which seems to be the tradition in the music business. How long did it take Solomon Linda to get his due for "The Lion Sleeps Tonight"?). Damn, white people are so angry, they have to try and hide the fact that their favorite artist(s) stole their songs in a totally obscure article that isn't linked to at all. And then give out warnings when I try and put out the truth. Damn, wikipedia editors hiding behind a registered name really do like to obscure the truth. Guarantee it if it was Willie Dixon stealing from Led Zeppelin, the bitter white folk would have written 20 paragraphs about Dixon stealing from Led.