User talk:176.88.31.134

"Windows Server 2000"

Clearly you are mistaken and should provide an official source. If you look up Windows 2000 editions, you will see, especially from Microsoft, that they were sold and marketed as Windows 2000 Server and/or the Windows 2000 Server family. "Server 2000" never existed, so why are you saying otherwise in the article? That's revisionism and a gross misunderstanding of the history of the OS. 192.69.181.186 (talk) 01:35, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

no, there is only one (client) edition of Windows 2000: Professional. Because of this, 2000 Server and Server 2000 are exactly the same. So, Windows Server 2000 is the server counterpart of Windows 2000. 176.88.31.134 (talk) 12:36, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Server 2000" only exists in your mind. In reality -- and please look it up -- it's called Windows 2000 Server. 192.69.181.186 (talk) 12:52, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Look here on Microsoft.com as one example: Windows 2000 Server. 192.69.181.186 (talk) 13:00, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And look here Windows 2000 Server 192.69.181.186 (talk) 13:12, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The client and server counterparts of Windows 2000 doesn't share the same name. However, it can also be called "Windows Server 2000" family. This is also the first release of Windows Server OS. 176.88.31.134 (talk) 15:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft released it as Windows 2000 Server and/or Windows 2000 Server family. Windows Server 2000 never existed. And no, the official "Windows Server" as marketed and distributed was Windows Server 2003. Windows 2000 Server was the continuation of NT 4.0 Server, so you're wrong. Please refrain from adding or modifying without actually knowing. While I agree that "Server 2000" indeed looks better, it would be completely wrong and revisionist to say otherwise today. It was never called that. 192.69.181.186 (talk) 23:25, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, I'm SmartyPants22. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Windows 2000, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SɱαɾƚყPαɳƚʂ22 (Ⓣⓐⓛⓚ) 20:46, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

^{[citation needed]} 176.88.31.134 (talk) 18:40, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.