User talk:184.68.5.218

Whoops, looks like the caption is correct at Audrey Hardy. clpo13_(talk) 22:18, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

No, it sure isn't. You just performed an undiscussed page move in order to make your self right and the fact you came here and said that proves you did it purely out of spite. Even the source you edited uses Audrey March Hardy:

http://soapcentral.com/gh/whoswho/audrey.php

Way to violate common name policies! And even after you just fixed someone else making those same mistakes at the Lily Winters and Phyllis Summers pages today so there's no way you didn't know what you were doing was

wrong when you did it.184.68.5.218 (talk) 22:38, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Except there's more than twice as many Google results for Audrey Hardy than for Audrey March Hardy. Even the General Hospital Wiki uses that name. clpo13_(talk) 22:40, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Uhm... nope. No, there aren't.184.68.5.218 (talk) 22:45, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

So does this source and this one... clpo13_(talk) 22:42, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Imdb can't be used and Michael Fairman is specifically listed at the Soap Projects page as being unreliable. You should really stay away from soap pages.64.114.255.114 (talk) 01:15, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Oh, you want Google hits? Here have a bunch:

• Audrey March Hardy - 571,000 hits vs. Audrey Hardy - 786,000 hits
• "Audrey March Hardy" - 2,110 hits vs. "Audrey Hardy" - 20,800 hits
• Audrey March Hardy General Hospital - 116,000 hits vs. Audrey Hardy General Hospital - 161,000 hits
• "Audrey March Hardy" general hospital - 2,020 hits vs. "Audrey Hardy" general hospital - 6,950 hits

Should I go on? clpo13_(talk) 22:52, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

You know every time you search just Audrey Hardy, all the Audrey March Hardy links are gonna pop up right? Some simple subtraction dictates beyond a shadow of a doubt that your logic is flawed. You shouldn't have moved the page and you only did so out of spite.64.114.255.114 (talk) 01:14, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Whatever happened to not harming the encyclopedia? clpo13_(talk) 22:21, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Shouldn't you be doing something productive... like always: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/732593174 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.70.13.10 (talk) 23:02, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

You should use the desktop site. The mobile site is really limited. clpo13_(talk) 23:03, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip. So you're saying I shouldn't go away then? Thanks, I'll remember to link to this. Muah! 184.70.13.10 (talk) 23:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Oh sure, you can read the site all you want. The mobile site doesn't easily link categories and other languages though, so reading is a bit hampered. clpo13_(talk) 23:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

---