User talk:194.192.22.33

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

THIS IP IS SHARED BETWEEN ABOUT 100 OFFICE EMPLOYEES[edit]

SO YEAH, DISREGARD PLEASE OR BAN, WHATEVER194.192.22.33 (talk) 08:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

194.192.22.33 (talk) 08:42, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

  1. Welcome, and one request. It is good if you sign your posts, this makes it possible to distinguish who said what. You can use four tildas to do that, like this: ~~~~. After the page is saved, this will become your signature. Try it! :) Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 09:07, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
  2. Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:17, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
  3. Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Patbaseball2221 06:46, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  4. Stop hand nuvola.svg
    This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
    The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Kukini hablame aqui 17:01, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

February 2008[edit]

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to T in the Park. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jons63 (talk) 12:38, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

May 2008[edit]

Information.png

Hi, the recent edit you made to Rudy Frederiksen has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 11:23, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

December 2008[edit]

Information.svg Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Mugu, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox or show preview button. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 11:35, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

July 2009[edit]

Information.svg

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nicolas Anelka, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nicolas Anelka was changed by 194.192.22.33 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-07-26T13:35:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:35, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

March 2010[edit]

Your edits to January 2[edit]

Dear 194.192.22.33,
Information.svg Some of your edits on the page January 2 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 16:16, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

February 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Pasteurization has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. GorillaWarfare talkcontribs 07:58, 2 February 2011 (UTC)