User talk:2.92.126.42

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 2.92.126.42, is part of a pool of dynamically allocated addresses and is registered to Beeline (Russia). It may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. (Note: Sometimes, due to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to register).

Applying an indefinite block to this IP is not appropriate, unless it is a soft block, because the IP address will later be reallocated to a different, unrelated, and unsuspecting user, thereby impairing access to Wikipedia in an inappropriate fashion. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking.

The best approach is to determine the CIDR IP numerical address range and make a higher-level decision to soft-block the entire range. http://www.arin.net/ (for approximately North America) and related sites can help to identify that range. Caution is advised when applying a range block as other Wikipedians, both registered and otherwise, may be affected.

In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports can be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Lend-Lease

Please take part in the discussion at talk:Lend-Lease before re-adding your edits again. They are incomprehensible/incoherent as English. (Hohum ^@) 16:33, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Your recent editing history at Lend-Lease shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. (Hohum ^@) 23:12, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Wikipedia isn't an essay

Hello, I would just like to tell you that I had undone your edit at Napoleon III as it seemed to be essay-ifying the article. Wikipedia isn't an essay. Thanks! Nigos (t@lk • Contribs) 11:28, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Your recent editing history at Napoleon III shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I believe you have reverted reversions to your addition five times in 8 hours: [[1]],[[2]],[[3]],[[4]],[[5]].---- Work permit (talk) 17:00, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are continuing what amounts to be an edit war with these edits: [[6]], [[7]]. You've been asked, in edit summaries, to open a new section on the articles talk page and discuss your edits there. I ask you again. Please discuss you edits on the articles talk page and reach a consensus. Thank you. ---- Work permit (talk) 14:01, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again. I've opened a discussion on the articles talk page. You can find it here. Please discuss the changes you would like to make in this section.-- Work permit (talk) 16:09, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your essay-like edits

Please discuss here before making any more essay-like edits. Thanks. Nigos (t@lk • Contribs) 07:58, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Nigos

Hello, 2.92.126.42. You have new messages at Nigos's talk page.
Message added 08:10, 8 July 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Please discuss the issue here: Talk:Napoleon III. Thanks. Nigos (t@lk • Contribs) 08:10, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I in fact started a section 5 days ago to discuss your attempted additions. It can be found here: Talk:Napoleon_III#Recent_edit's_by_an_IP. ---- Work permit (talk) 16:22, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:2.92.126.42 reported by User:MrClog (Result: ). Thank you. MrClog (talk) 17:05, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 17:25, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.