User talk:207.38.133.122

I have blocked this IP and any accounts using it. If you want me to unblock you I suggest you make an unblock request from your account. HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 05:03, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

207.38.133.122 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is my account. 207.38.133.122 (talk) 01:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Ok, and now you are blocked. PhilKnight (talk) 01:16, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If this is your only account then why are you trying to get someone banned who you have not history of interacting with? HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 02:14, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

We're talking about someone who methodically harasses anyone who doesn't fully agree with them, pushes a non-house POV, has been topic-banned multiple times, is a constant drain on everyone they interact with, and is going to get community-banned sooner or later anyway. Why not just ban them now and save everyone some effort? 207.38.133.122 (talk) 03:06, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

We know you think that; but why do you think that? _Muffled ^Pocketed 15:52, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

---