User talk:209.202.201.238

December 2022

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Entuziazm/Archive, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Lemonaka (talk) 15:22, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My IP address is not affiliated with a racist sockpuppeter, I just want people to know that. Hope you have a good day. 209.202.201.238 (talk) 15:24, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should not edit an archive page, nor should you change the words or sentences created by other editors. FWIW, this edit is not suitable. Special:Diff/1128898613 Lemonaka (talk) 15:32, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I have blocked you for 3 months for block evasion. PhilKnight (talk) 15:48, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

209.202.201.238 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello again! So since my last appeal did not seem plausible enough, I am going to explain in further detail. Let us begin! So, why am I even blocked in the first place? Well unfortunately, I have committed block evasion. In particular, I edited my talk page when it received a warning to lower suspicion about myself for others so that I don't risk getting consequences. Because of this, a clever administrator by the name of PhilKnight quickly realized what I was doing and blocked my account for three months as a punishment for my actions. Now that we have context as to what has happened, I will now explain as to why I think I should be unblocked. At the time I committed my block evasion, I wasn't even aware of the fact of what I was even doing. For instance, I had no idea that the term - block evasion - was an offense according to Wikipedia's rules. Because of this, whilst I was blocked, I decided to take the time and read all the policies, guidelines, and general rules of Wikipedia and its community. As a result, I felt extremely disappointed in myself due to the fact that I violated such a basic rule. Fortunately though, I actually learnt more information about Wikipedia which I did not originally know before! Also, when I was finally able to go back to editing on Wikipedia, I first began by going to a certain archive page to remove my IP address from being affiliated with a sockpuppeter since I did not want future Wikipedia users who stumble across this IP address to think that it is the address of a sockpuppeter. Obviously, as we know, editing an archive page is something you are not supposed to do; it's vandalism. Unfortunately however, I was completely oblivious of that fact since I did not know it existed at the time. The good news is that it didn't take long for me to get taught about this rule by Lemonaka. Third and finally, I wasn't aware that when an individual on Wikipedia ever produces text of some sort whether it be editing an article or having a conversation/argument/debate with someone else, that they must have a neutral point of view. I feel as though I wasn't neutral. For example, I felt that my attitude in the previous appeal and towards Phil were very rude and I want to apologize if I actually was indeed being rude.

So to conclude, I have acknowledged and recognized my mistakes, errors and wrong-doings, and I am deeply sorry for any inconveniences I have caused, and I want to be given a second chance as I pinky-promise to you all that I will never cause even the slightest problem ever again. I am refined now. If you still do not think that I deserve to be unblocked, could you please at least make my block a few days or a week? Three months is, in my opinion, a little too cruel. Also, I want this appeal to be shown as a future warning for any individual who commits acts similar to what I have done. Thank you for reading and I hope you have a pleasant day.

Decline reason:

Log into your account and appeal via WP:UTRS. Unblock requests on this IP will not be entertained. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:01, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.