User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Both you and cluebot have undone changes removing the large amount of unreferenced promotional material from this article. Since no one else has done anything to clear this article up since the neutrality check banner was added a year ago please explain why you are preventing me from doing so. The Cluebot site is timeing out preventing reporting of errors. Please correct this. You are stopping IPs from editing contrary to Wikipedia ethos and are allowing Wikipedia to be used for promotional activity, contrary to Wikipedia ethos. (talk) 09:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Before removing this ammount of content it needs to be discussed on the talk page. Also, I didn't see that you had provided an edit summary (because you has the auto one from reverting ClueBot. Thanks - Kingpin13 (talk) 09:07, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Removing material that contravenes multiple Wikipedia policies on an article which has had a neutrality banner on it for a year with no subsequent improvement or discussion, does not require discussion. You've successfully prevented this article being improved. Rather than the negative activity of undoing others Wikipedia policy compliant work, what are you going to do to improve this article ? You're wrong about the edit summary I said "(Undid revision 279763002 by ClueBot (talk) This is preventing editing from IP and the cluebot report facility timesout." and the original edit said "Remove advertorial material and neutralty banner)". The Cluebot report facility is still giving errors. Taken together, perhaps you can understand why I'm getting annoyed. (talk) 09:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Okay, mybad. It just seemed like a lot of content to be removing. Feel free to change it. I'd also suggest you put a note on the talk page anyway, just saying that you are, and why. Thanks for your edits! - Kingpin13 (talk) 09:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
OK - please be more carefully when accusing people of vandalism, not all of us IP editors are vandals. As for talk pages I always think it's more difficult to follow, having half a conversation on one page and half on another. A WP oddity AFAIC. Sorry if it's non standard. I've reverted (if Cluebot allows :-( )your undo citing this conversation. Cheers (talk) 10:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
n/p, thanks for dealing with this sensibly, and sorry you had to at all (I've removed mine and ClueBot's warnings from your page). Cheers - Kingpin13 (talk) 10:18, 26 March 2009 (UTC)