User talk:212.9.28.9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block.
Kgpg new.svg To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may use this form to request a username. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.


May 2010[edit]

Yet another example of vandalism and personal attack. Lee Carré (talk) 10:05, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Having recently discovered the vandalism to my user page from this address (also from 82.112.144.189 and 81.20.185.100), my interest was piqued. I have studied the history of edits from this IP address; the overwhelming majority are vandalism or otherwise unconstructive. A handful (about a dozen) are point-ful edits. From my own research, the claims made in the most recent unblock request seem to fit with the facts. This address is for a business-grade ADSL connection, most likely to Highlands College, but certainly within Jersey. Given this disproportionate balance of harm:help, may I suggest that this IP address have more sturdy controls placed upon it to prevent this unhelpful situtation from continuing (and requiring much anti-vandalism effort), and a notice be placed on the user (talk) page advising that an account should be used to make edits, considering the above facts. Lee Carré (talk) 10:49, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

In response to the most recent ublock request itself; I find the poster’s comments unreasonable, and that the situation faced by Wikipedia and its editors to be “not fair” instead. The notion that the particular culprit(s) are ‘untracable’ is simply ridiculous given even basic resources of a modern network, and especially those available to the administrators of the Jersey education network(s). Lee Carré (talk) 10:49, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

June 2010[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page CNET.com has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:53, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Dell. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:57, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

October 2010[edit]

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tinie Tempah. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Minimac (talk) 12:36, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Tinie Tempah, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for instructions. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 12:36, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop x nuvola with clock.svg
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:55, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tiago Ferreira, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 09:57, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

March 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Sephira has been reverted.
Your edit here to Sephira was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/sephiramerkaba) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:26, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

December 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to James Job, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Vrenator talk 13:23, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 12:21, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Ready (talk~~contributions) 18:12, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

January 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Torreslfchero. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Emirates Stadium, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Torreslfchero (talk) 13:45, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

June 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Category:Copyright law, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Yinta 08:59, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jake Perree concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jake Perree, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 12:30, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Jake Perree[edit]

Hello 212.9.28.9. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Jake Perree.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jake Perree}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:01, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Fluffernutter. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Grainville School, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 15:21, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Melmann. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Texting while driving, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Melmann(talk) 14:15, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Firewall (computing), you may be blocked from editing. LOL second time. Super48paul (talk) 14:08, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Mr. Men, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Widefox; talk 08:08, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Josve05a. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Scottish independence referendum, 2014, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. (tJosve05a (c) 15:18, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

October 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Technical failure— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 10:56, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Technical failure with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. 7Sidz (talk) 10:58, 22 October 2014 (UTC)