User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:43, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. SmartSE (talk) 10:18, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:06, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Final warning[edit]

You do not appear to be taking any notice of our repeated attempts to explain what is wrong with the content that you are adding and are lying about your connection to ADC. You've now added copyrighted material to plant tissue test as well. Please take this as a final warning, that if you continue to promote ADC's products on Wikipedia, or add copyrighted material, you will be blocked from editing. If you need advice on how to contribute productively, there are plenty of people (including myself) who are willing to help, but at the moment you are being disruptive. SmartSE (talk) 11:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC) I have never lied about my association with ADC Bioscientific. I am a share holder and very proud of the business. But who ever wrote the "The meter determines "how green is this plant" by shining a light through a leaf inserted in a slot and measuring the amount of light transmitted. Minolta is one manufacturer of such meters.[4] ADC Bioscientific is another.[5] " Is simply not true. It is naive in its description, factually incorrect and, although i'm no expert, badly written. I was attempting to address and improve the article. If I have inadvertently used copyrighted material, I am truly sorry, but please could you explain to me where I have. I do have rights to use certain trade and brand names. Where new technology has been developed then I think it is in everyone's interest to promote the technology. It's certainly no worse than having articles on "beats audio" by "Dr Dre" (I just picked that at random). I disseminate information about technology that I know about. If i see something that is factually incorrect I try to change it. If there is something which is a little thin on explanation or would be more interesting with a bit more detail. I add it. This is a shared IP address, so I can not speak for everyone who has access to it.