Nemesis & Arrogance
Good afternoon Excirial,
Could you please explain why you have opted to delete the "Nemesis & Arrogance" entry due to them being a "non-notable band"?
I have done some research regarding the outcome, and found this article:
There are over 125, 000 google search hits for Nemesis & Arrogance, I would not call this non-notable. These are not all "self promotion". If there are any problems with the way the article has been written, these can be ammended, however I do not accept your secletion of "non-notable band" as a valid reason for not allowing this article to be published. I would also question your knowledge of the UK Hip Hop / Grime genre's and therefore your ability to call this band "non-notable" in the first place.
- I re-reviewed the article, and i agree with your assessment that notability is not that big an issue in this article. As of such i removed the PROD tag and replaced with a set of more detailed, standard maintenance tags.
- Why did i tag the article in the first place then? The main issue with the article was the weak quality of its external references, along with the structure of the article itself. In fact the article seemed to suggest that there was a lack of notability covered with a lot of external references which are in all due right nothing more then links were CD's can be bought, or article's with nothing more then a mention, meaning they fail the reliable sources guideline. Granted, i should have don a simple search but alas, i didn't.
- As for the link and my knowledge of the hiphop culture: I got no knowledge on those, yet these are not required to mark an article for CSD. All article's fall under the General notability guidelines, and each specific category has its own more specialized sub guidelines - in this case WP:BAND. It is up to an article to indicate why its subject is notable. If an article can't prove it has notability under the guidelines it is tagged for WP:PROD/ WP:AFD, or in worse cases WP:CSD. The link you provided is (as you can see) a user subpage and not an official policy or even a guideline. I tend to agree with its content though, yet in this case i assumed the general guideline provided enough information (Which, it seems, was a mistake to assume).
- And last: Remember to sign your comments. You can sign them by added ~~~~ after you post them.
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. - Jasmeet_181 (talk) 13:49, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Bonnyrigg has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://bonnyriggrose1.tripod.com/ (matching the regex rule (?<!jeff560\.)tripod\.com).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:07, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Welcome to Wikipedia. The that you made to the page Womanizer (song) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Gurch (talk) 10:27, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The that you made to the page Microsoft Office Communicator has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tommy (msg) 15:00, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
The you made to PRS for Music constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Calmer Waters 13:09, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.