User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to Wikipedia[edit]


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address ( is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Mushroom (Talk) 00:27, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Information.svg Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Whistleblower (magazine). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Alastair Rae (talk) 19:00, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

July 2010[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Bob Avakian, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Tommy! [message] 15:14, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up! Notable source where he is repeatedly referred to by his popular nickname added! (talk) 16:18, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Bob Avakian has been reverted, as it introduced negative or controversial biographical material without providing a reliable source for this information. Wikipedia requires that all such material be sourced to address the issue of libel. Thank you. Grayshi talk my contribs 17:52, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

My entry was both factual and reliably sourced. Please refrain from removing factual and sourced material in the future, or at the very least discuss these things on the discussion page of the article. Thank you. (talk) 19:00, 28 July 2010 (UTC)